space man

space man — CS2 Stats

OM76561198858486606[U:1:898220878]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

382Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,987Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,104Blue band · top ~33.1% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (25 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,104 -2,404 17 Feb – 6 Sept · 51 days played
10,00023,380peak 23,38017 Feb6 Sept
23,380Peak Premier in tracked matches
59Days played since 2026-02-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 9,276 below peak (23,380)
  • -1,723 over 30 days · declining
  • -3,848 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 896 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches7——
Win rate57%——
K/D1.16——
Headshot %41%——

Measured 4 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate42.4%41.9%44.3%1.9% short
Shot accuracy11.2%9.6%11.9%0.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.860.981.030.17 short
Match win rate42.1%43.8%45.2%3.1% short

This profile sits below the typical Purple band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGspace manPREMIER14,104 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning49
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–49–4Last 10047%Win rateWWWWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −8.1pp headshot accuracy · −106ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 441ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 476ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility5.7
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.9
Utility5.7
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time537ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 536ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 17 Feb →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · anubis, 9 Aug →
242msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · cache, 6 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 9 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W4Current streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 57% over 7anubisWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2010–1050%0.05
nukeB189–950%-0.00
mirageC167–944%-0.01
dust2C125–742%0.04
infernoB126–650%0.03
anubisD112–918%-0.02
cacheA74–357%-0.04
vertigo—22–0100%0.10
overpass—22–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,595Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
2,270Matches
42.1%Match win rate
42.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Blue band
11.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Blue band
4,088MVPs
821Hours (in match)
1,930Bombs planted
401Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,002inferno
2,356nuke
2,184dust2
887vertigo
432train
288office
59lake
47safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.9%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
75.6%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
546msReaction time
30.0%T opening success
55.0%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
10.14HE damage / grenade
12.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.0202% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–80.0122%6 Sept →
dust213–40.0515%6 Sept →
dust213–110.1720%31 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.0825%30 Aug →
anubis4–80.0021%26 Aug →
nuke13–70.0719%24 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0417%21 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0422%21 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0112%18 Aug →
dust25–130.0422%16 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0227%12 Aug →
mirage11–130.0234%10 Aug →
anubis3–130.0147%9 Aug →
inferno7–130.0220%9 Aug →
inferno6–130.0238%9 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0324%8 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0822%8 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0420%8 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0217%7 Aug →
ancient13–100.1227%7 Aug →
ancient16–120.0821%6 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0919%6 Aug →
inferno13–60.0631%4 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0719%3 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0134%3 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.1027%3 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0417%3 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0620%2 Aug →
vertigo9–60.1532%29 Jul →
vertigo13–100.0533%29 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0125%27 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0116%23 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.080%23 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0412%22 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0719%22 Jul →
nuke6–130.0219%22 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0119%20 Jul →
inferno13–100.0822%15 Jul →
ancient11–130.0616%14 Jul →
anubis13–60.1317%13 Jul →
dust213–90.0411%13 Jul →
inferno9–130.0625%13 Jul →
mirage13–60.0730%13 Jul →
nuke16–140.0424%13 Jul →
ancient13–50.2222%12 Jul →
cache13–90.0019%12 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0319%12 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0327%10 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0331%9 Jul →
ancient15–150.0320%9 Jul →
anubis13–8-0.0121%9 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0817%9 Jul →
inferno13–20.0319%9 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0815%7 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0918%5 Jul →
dust216–140.0433%30 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0117%30 Jun →
dust216–130.0229%29 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0115%29 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0410%28 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.0626%26 Jun →
nuke4–13-0.0121%25 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0325%25 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0111%25 Jun →
overpass16–120.0418%22 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.0324%22 Jun →
overpass16–12-0.0616%21 Jun →
inferno10–13-0.0425%14 Jun →
dust215–15-0.0420%12 Jun →
nuke13–3-0.028%8 Jun →
ancient16–13-0.0214%7 Jun →
nuke13–6-0.0114%29 May →
cache13–100.0135%25 May →
cache9–13-0.0325%23 May →
nuke13–5-0.0625%12 May →
mirage3–13-0.0930%10 May →
nuke16–13-0.0518%4 Apr →
dust29–130.0132%2 Apr →
mirage13–70.0841%1 Apr →
nuke13–4-0.0429%1 Apr →
nuke7–130.0214%1 Apr →
nuke13–60.0229%27 Mar →
inferno16–130.0521%25 Mar →
nuke7–130.0127%23 Mar →
ancient16–140.0921%23 Mar →
mirage2–130.0213%23 Mar →
ancient11–130.1817%22 Mar →
nuke11–130.0519%22 Mar →
ancient13–20.1926%21 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.0918%20 Mar →
nuke15–150.0919%17 Mar →
ancient7–130.0116%17 Mar →
inferno13–80.0927%16 Mar →
inferno13–100.1011%16 Mar →
nuke7–130.0318%16 Mar →
mirage10–130.1224%15 Mar →
dust27–130.0718%15 Mar →
ancient13–70.1616%15 Mar →
ancient13–20.2524%17 Feb →
dust215–150.0738%17 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.