4TAYLOR👑 — CS2 Stats

76561198852710277[U:1:892444549]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

7,315Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since

8,163Hours in CS

CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player

CSDB Leaderboard#177715 of 220872 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 3,529 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,529 → 3,529

+31Tracked matches · now 7,315

0.0ppWin rate · 43.3% → 43.3%

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 4 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,529 +0 28 Aug – 3 Sept · 4 observations

30,633Peak Premier in tracked matches

3,529Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

45Days played since 2026-06-04

Faceit ELO

At peak — 3,529
Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 — 471 to go
Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

Metric	Last 7	Previous 7	Change
Matches	9	17	−8
Win rate	67%	59%	+8pp
K/D	0.89	1.01	−0.12
Headshot %	66%	63%	+4pp

Measured 10 Sep 2026 → 17 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=25,925), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	52.2%	51.0%
Shot accuracy	12.1%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.12	1.09
Match win rate	58.4%	48.4%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning69

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–46Last 10054%Win rateWLLLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · +92ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–4 · 20% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 25%
Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 29%
Avg reaction 591ms

Last 20

8–12 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 28%
Avg reaction 545ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim9.0

Utility5.8

Positioning6.9

Opening Duels6.4

Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 43% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning6.9

Utility5.8

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels5.9

Win Impact2.8

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.04

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.05

Reaction time558ms+21ms

first ⅓ avg 537ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms

Headshot accuracy28.0%+3.7%

first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 28.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 26 Aug →

51%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · ancient, 8 Jun →

336msFastest reaction time · 4–7 · dust2, 8 Jun →

13–0Biggest win · dust2, 4 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak

6–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 7mirageWeakest map · 46% over 24

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	32	17–15	53%	0.03
mirage	B	24	11–13	46%	0.01
ancient	A	16	9–7	56%	0.02
inferno	B	12	6–6	50%	0.03
cache	S	7	5–2	71%	0.04
anubis	—	4	3–1	75%	0.03
nuke	—	4	2–2	50%	0.01
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

334,515Lifetime kills

1.12K/D · Top 50% of Level 10 players

9,754Matches

58.4%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 10 players

52.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players

12.1%Shot accuracy

39,925MVPs

8,163Hours (in match)

17,443Bombs planted

3,408Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47133,169

M4A4 / M4A1-S56,106

AWP33,495

Desert Eagle26,966

P2000 / USP-S19,058

Glock-1810,831

Knife8,631

MP96,840

Galil AR6,136

FAMAS5,538

Lifetime map wins

25,043dust2

20,677inferno

5,531vertigo

4,340train

4,051nuke

481cbble

37lake

16sugarcane

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

8,523Matches

55%Win rate

1.25Avg K/D

91.9ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

27%1v2 clutch win

19Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	1431	55%	1.25	18.4
Dust2	892	57%	1.26	18.6
Ancient	702	57%	1.19	17.8
Anubis	445	52%	1.13	17.7
Inferno	110	56%	1.21	17.1
Nuke	102	51%	1.09	17.0
Overpass	83	59%	1.27	18.4
Vertigo	81	51%	1.01	16.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.4%Headshot accuracy

36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.0%Spray accuracy

81.8%Counter-strafing

7.9°Preaim

541msReaction time

43.1%T opening success

63.8%CT opening success

0.52Enemies flashed / flash

7.8%Flash assists

6.13HE damage / grenade

12.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	25–22	0.05	22%	11 Sept →
ancient	7–13	0.01	22%	10 Sept →
dust2	1–13	0.06	32%	9 Sept →
mirage	3–13	0.12	35%	9 Sept →
mirage	2–4	-0.07	13%	5 Sept →
dust2	13–0	0.10	18%	4 Sept →
dust2	8–13	0.04	35%	28 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.04	38%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.09	32%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.03	40%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.03	21%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.19	20%	26 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.06	33%	25 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.01	37%	22 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.00	24%	22 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.05	21%	22 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.05	33%	22 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.06	34%	21 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.02	16%	15 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.16	40%	15 Aug →
inferno	3–13	0.13	46%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.02	27%	12 Aug →
mirage	16–19	0.06	29%	7 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.03	28%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.02	26%	5 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.05	26%	5 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.00	27%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–0	0.09	21%	5 Aug →
inferno	19–16	0.05	20%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.05	34%	3 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	21%	3 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.02	25%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	29%	2 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.10	36%	1 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.04	23%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.11	34%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.01	27%	31 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	25%	30 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.14	21%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.05	31%	6 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	20%	6 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.01	33%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.01	23%	1 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.04	26%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.03	30%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.04	19%	29 Jun →
inferno	8–13	0.04	22%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.04	34%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.08	25%	27 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.05	28%	25 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.05	18%	25 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	23%	25 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	20%	23 Jun →
inferno	13–4	0.07	24%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.06	35%	23 Jun →
cache	13–3	0.00	26%	23 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	11%	23 Jun →
ancient	13–6	-0.06	20%	23 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.02	20%	22 Jun →
inferno	4–13	-0.02	7%	22 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	26%	22 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.04	18%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.01	21%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–6	-0.04	13%	20 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	16%	20 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	29%	20 Jun →
nuke	13–3	0.03	30%	20 Jun →
inferno	4–13	-0.08	14%	20 Jun →
dust2	13–5	-0.05	33%	20 Jun →
dust2	6–13	0.00	18%	15 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.02	30%	15 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.01	22%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	23%	14 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	9%	13 Jun →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	25%	13 Jun →
overpass	13–8	0.08	12%	12 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	19%	10 Jun →
mirage	16–14	0.00	22%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	18%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.03	29%	10 Jun →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	27%	10 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	15%	10 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.06	27%	9 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	29%	9 Jun →
dust2	13–16	-0.00	24%	9 Jun →
ancient	22–19	0.06	30%	9 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	32%	9 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	29%	9 Jun →
dust2	4–7	-0.03	24%	8 Jun →
ancient	10–13	0.00	51%	8 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.03	18%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.03	17%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.03	17%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	23%	6 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.10	31%	5 Jun →
ancient	13–3	0.02	38%	5 Jun →
anubis	6–13	-0.02	23%	5 Jun →
mirage	16–12	0.03	28%	4 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.10	24%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.10	22%	4 Jun →