Nasuttajanasu

Nasuttajanasu — CS2 Stats

76561198841918157[U:1:881652429]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,460Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,388Purple band · top ~18.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3 · 954 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,388 +2,233 4 Sept – 29 Oct · 22 days played
15,15517,928peak 17,9284 Sept29 Oct
18,008Peak Premier in tracked matches
954Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-09-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 954
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 97 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 540 below peak (17,928)
  • +346 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,612 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNasuttajanasuFACEITLevel 3 · 954 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER17,388 · Purple bandPEAK ELO954csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47
Positioning46
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateWLWWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · +36ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim4.7
Utility5.0
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7
Positioning4.6
Utility5.0
Mechanics3.5
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact7.2

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time568ms+29ms
first ⅓ avg 538ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy10.4%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 9.9% → last ⅓ avg 10.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 22 Oct →
28%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · inferno, 11 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 29 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 22 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 5anubisWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2715–1256%-0.00
infernoA2313–1057%-0.01
nukeB2010–1050%-0.02
anubisD102–820%-0.01
mirageA53–260%-0.05
dust2C52–340%-0.03
cache—43–175%-0.01
vertigo—21–150%-0.04
train—20–20%-0.01
office—10–10%-0.07
overpass—10–10%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

647Matches
51%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
71.9ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient13055%0.8514.1
Nuke11857%0.9113.7
Anubis10848%0.8213.0
Inferno10053%0.9013.0
Mirage7451%0.7711.5
Dust26030%0.7111.7
Cache2846%0.8612.7
Train1759%0.8713.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.8%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
65.8%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
565msReaction time
41.3%T opening success
40.1%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
8.03HE damage / grenade
7.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.7585% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–8-0.0410%2 Nov →
ancient3–13-0.113%29 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.036%29 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0617%27 Oct →
mirage13–60.007%27 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.073%26 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0411%25 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.006%25 Oct →
inferno13–60.0614%25 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.049%25 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.064%24 Oct →
anubis13–70.046%24 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0211%24 Oct →
ancient13–10.138%22 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.057%22 Oct →
anubis5–130.0010%21 Oct →
ancient13–100.008%18 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0710%18 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0318%18 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.019%15 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0214%15 Oct →
cache11–130.0117%13 Oct →
nuke13–70.0923%13 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0216%13 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0410%11 Oct →
ancient13–60.0416%11 Oct →
nuke11–130.0611%11 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0315%9 Oct →
ancient10–130.0415%9 Oct →
nuke13–90.013%9 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0117%9 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.090%8 Oct →
dust213–11-0.099%6 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.127%3 Oct →
cache13–4-0.037%3 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0517%2 Oct →
ancient13–80.016%2 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0612%29 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0321%29 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0212%29 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0513%29 Sept →
vertigo6–9-0.0416%29 Sept →
ancient13–60.0014%27 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0616%27 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0211%22 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.038%20 Sept →
inferno13–60.104%20 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.075%19 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.068%19 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.034%19 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0614%16 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.027%15 Sept →
anubis10–130.037%14 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.024%14 Sept →
inferno13–30.0116%14 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.025%13 Sept →
inferno13–70.0519%13 Sept →
ancient9–130.0312%13 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0310%12 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.015%12 Sept →
ancient13–50.0510%12 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0414%12 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0411%12 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0113%12 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0613%12 Sept →
nuke13–70.0219%12 Sept →
train12–12-0.0316%12 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0313%12 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0813%12 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0011%11 Sept →
ancient13–90.0111%11 Sept →
inferno13–40.0328%11 Sept →
ancient13–40.035%11 Sept →
office8–13-0.079%11 Sept →
overpass10–130.0712%11 Sept →
ancient13–30.0310%10 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.087%9 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.029%9 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.035%9 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0611%7 Sept →
ancient11–130.027%7 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.015%7 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.048%6 Sept →
anubis13–3-0.0110%6 Sept →
dust27–130.0211%6 Sept →
ancient6–130.015%6 Sept →
nuke16–14-0.047%6 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0714%6 Sept →
cache13–50.0412%6 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.098%5 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0017%5 Sept →
ancient13–110.0010%5 Sept →
inferno13–110.019%5 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.049%4 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0411%4 Sept →
train1–130.0210%4 Sept →
inferno13–20.055%4 Sept →
ancient10–130.0015%4 Sept →
nuke13–40.067%4 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.005%2 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.