🅼🅸🅽🅶⚡._.+ — CS2 Stats

76561198841903319[U:1:881637591]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,792Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,706Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player

CSDB Leaderboard#225152 of 252579 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,018 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,018 → 2,018

+1Tracked matches · now 1,792

0.0ppWin rate · 57.1% → 57.1%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,018 +0 1 Sept – 14 Oct · 3 observations

2,018Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

35Days played since 2026-07-15

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,018
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 482 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

Metric	Last 30	Previous 30	Change
Matches	26	—	—
Win rate	54%	—	—
K/D	0.99	—	—
Headshot %	59%	—	—

Measured 18 Sep 2026 → 17 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,061), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	52.3%	50.9%
Shot accuracy	13.7%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.11	1.09
Match win rate	52.2%	48.4%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning59

Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–34–10Last 10056%Win rateWWWWLLTWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −5.4pp headshot accuracy · −48ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

4–1 · 80% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 26%
Avg reaction 524ms

Last 10

6–2–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 25%
Avg reaction 530ms

Last 20

11–7–2 · 55% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 28%
Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.7

Utility5.2

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels4.1

Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 60% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning5.9

Utility5.2

Mechanics8.5

Opening Duels6.1

Win Impact7.4

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time566ms−38ms

first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms

Headshot accuracy27.4%+2.8%

first ⅓ avg 24.6% → last ⅓ avg 27.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 21 Jul →

100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · dust2, 1 Oct →

367msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · dust2, 11 Aug →

13–0Biggest win · dust2, 7 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

W4Current streak

7–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 85anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	85	51–34	60%	0.01
anubis	D	6	2–4	33%	0.00
ancient	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.01
nuke	—	3	2–1	67%	0.01
inferno	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.09
cache	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

113,519Lifetime kills

1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 10 players

4,793Matches

52.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 10 players

52.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players

13.7%Shot accuracy

23,778MVPs

2,191Hours (in match)

3,580Bombs planted

1,054Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4745,423

M4A4 / M4A1-S16,041

AWP12,597

Desert Eagle12,518

P2000 / USP-S5,726

Glock-184,544

Knife1,918

SSG 081,850

Galil AR1,617

MP91,617

Lifetime map wins

35,185dust2

3,609inferno

1,445vertigo

888nuke

447train

242cbble

24lake

21italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

749Matches

53%Win rate

1.18Avg K/D

89.2ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	91	64%	1.23	19.2
Mirage	69	54%	0.99	17.2
Ancient	41	54%	1.07	16.7
Anubis	24	50%	1.17	19.7
Inferno	20	35%	0.87	15.1
Overpass	11	45%	1.13	17.8
Vertigo	8	50%	1.42	20.6
Nuke	6	50%	1.15	19.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.7%Headshot accuracy

34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.0%Spray accuracy

88.4%Counter-strafing

7.5°Preaim

578msReaction time

60.0%T opening success

48.6%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

8.3%Flash assists

12.04HE damage / grenade

5.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–8	0.05	35%	14 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.05	24%	14 Oct →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	32%	10 Oct →
anubis	13–6	0.09	23%	10 Oct →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	17%	5 Oct →
dust2	11–13	0.01	31%	5 Oct →
dust2	12–12	-0.05	19%	5 Oct →
dust2	13–11	0.02	14%	5 Oct →
dust2	13–1	0.02	29%	4 Oct →
dust2	12–12	0.01	28%	4 Oct →
ancient	2–13	-0.04	24%	4 Oct →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	22%	1 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.09	33%	1 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.04	17%	1 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.04	30%	1 Oct →
dust2	0–3	-0.07	100%	1 Oct →
dust2	13–5	0.04	20%	30 Sept →
anubis	7–13	-0.06	10%	30 Sept →
dust2	13–3	0.01	22%	26 Sept →
ancient	4–13	0.01	29%	26 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.08	28%	26 Sept →
dust2	13–8	0.07	27%	26 Sept →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	24%	25 Sept →
dust2	13–8	0.05	26%	25 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	26%	25 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	30%	25 Sept →
dust2	9–13	0.05	29%	18 Sept →
anubis	13–8	0.01	28%	14 Sept →
dust2	6–13	0.00	18%	14 Sept →
dust2	13–8	0.00	35%	14 Sept →
dust2	13–9	0.01	23%	5 Sept →
dust2	7–13	0.10	28%	5 Sept →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	21%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	13%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	19%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.08	21%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.08	43%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.02	17%	24 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.00	17%	22 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.04	25%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.00	19%	21 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	18%	21 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.06	24%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	13%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.05	8%	11 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.04	31%	11 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	46%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.15	23%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–0	-0.00	10%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	19%	6 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.05	32%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	17%	6 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.01	19%	6 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.03	22%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	21%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.10	22%	5 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	7%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	32%	4 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.05	28%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.09	14%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.01	20%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	18%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.00	20%	3 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	19%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	19%	2 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	22%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	19%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.10	24%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.09	26%	1 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.08	27%	1 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	13%	1 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	23%	1 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.07	21%	29 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.03	18%	29 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	17%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.07	18%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	35%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.03	26%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.08	23%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.03	27%	25 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	32%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.06	27%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.02	11%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.16	27%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.02	31%	21 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.03	30%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	31%	20 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.03	33%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	36%	19 Jul →
anubis	1–13	-0.03	53%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	20%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.09	24%	19 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	26%	16 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.02	19%	16 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.00	11%	16 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	10%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.07	26%	15 Jul →
dust2	12–12	-0.01	24%	15 Jul →
dust2	8–1	-0.03	19%	15 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.02	22%	15 Jul →