jangboner

jangboner — CS2 Stats

AF76561198841775539[U:1:881509811]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,540Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,581Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating19,648Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#82245 of 232767 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,195 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,540 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 5 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,648 +5,202 5 Feb7 Sept · 19 days played
14,44619,769peak 19,7695 Feb7 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,195 +0 1 Sept7 Sept · 2 observations
1,1951,195peak 1,1951 Sept7 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,195Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-02-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,195
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 6 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 121 below peak (19,769)
  • -121 over 30 days · steady
  • +3,051 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 352 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate39.9%46.8%48.3%8.4% short
Shot accuracy14.8%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.851.061.070.22 short
Match win rate41.2%46.3%46.9%5.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjangbonerFACEITLevel 8 · 1,195 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,648 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,195csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning44
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47467Last 10047%Win rateTLLLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · +30ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 041 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 10

  • 271 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim4.8
Utility6.0
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.8

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning4.4
Utility6.0
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact1.4

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time596ms−82ms
first ⅓ avg 678ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%−4.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 13 Aug
100%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 11 May
453msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · mirage, 13 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 13 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 58% over 12ancientWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC23101343%-0.02
dust2A2011955%-0.03
nukeA169756%0.01
infernoA127558%-0.02
ancientD93633%-0.01
cacheC52340%-0.01
overpassC52340%-0.06
anubis41325%-0.04
vertigo42250%-0.02
train1010%-0.08
poseidon1010%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

68,350Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
3,439Matches
41.2%Match win rate
39.9%Headshot %
14.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
7,949MVPs
1,581Hours (in match)
4,194Bombs planted
1,065Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,594
AWP9,250
AUG1,756
FAMAS1,727
SG 5531,629

Lifetime map wins

6,624inferno
4,198nuke
3,427dust2
3,417train
3,304vertigo
232office
231cbble
220lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

940Matches
51%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
73.4ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9253%0.9913.2
Nuke7454%1.0314.4
Dust23543%0.8313.5
Ancient3050%0.8413.7
Inferno2864%1.1014.8
Anubis2454%0.8611.8
Cache1753%1.0616.4
Vertigo1656%0.8814.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.6%Spray accuracy
71.3%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
601msReaction time
37.8%T opening success
28.0%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
9.61HE damage / grenade
11.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.817% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient15–150.0519%19 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0737%19 Aug
mirage10–130.0323%18 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0518%17 Aug
nuke6–130.0228%15 Aug
nuke0–8-0.089%14 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0213%14 Aug
ancient13–110.0111%14 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0314%14 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0124%13 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0320%13 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0026%13 Aug
mirage13–10.1116%13 Aug
cache8–130.0212%13 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0414%12 Aug
mirage1–13-0.065%12 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0221%12 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0223%12 Aug
cache13–7-0.0322%12 Aug
inferno13–100.0816%9 Aug
mirage6–100.0212%9 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0217%8 Aug
dust215–15-0.0624%8 Aug
nuke13–110.0219%8 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0020%5 Aug
inferno13–100.0226%5 Aug
mirage13–9-0.017%5 Aug
dust212–16-0.0411%21 Jun
overpass4–13-0.063%21 Jun
nuke3–130.0913%17 Jun
train12–12-0.087%17 Jun
dust213–7-0.0217%17 Jun
overpass13–3-0.0314%17 Jun
cache13–6-0.0115%16 Jun
dust210–13-0.0621%13 Jun
nuke14–160.0515%13 Jun
poseidon8–8-0.115%12 Jun
overpass1–9-0.2219%12 Jun
inferno2–9-0.0719%12 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0423%12 Jun
inferno13–7-0.008%9 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0312%8 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0811%5 Jun
vertigo13–70.0121%4 Jun
vertigo13–8-0.0022%4 Jun
vertigo12–120.0117%4 Jun
cache8–13-0.039%2 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0026%1 Jun
anubis13–4-0.0229%30 May
dust213–10-0.0422%30 May
dust22–5-0.070%27 May
mirage5–13-0.0719%27 May
vertigo5–9-0.1018%27 May
nuke13–6-0.0025%26 May
mirage13–10-0.0211%25 May
ancient13–4-0.0316%25 May
nuke13–50.0213%21 May
nuke13–70.0713%21 May
mirage7–13-0.0714%20 May
nuke16–13-0.0321%20 May
dust213–60.0013%20 May
dust211–13-0.087%20 May
ancient11–130.0016%20 May
ancient15–15-0.0315%19 May
inferno13–7-0.0519%19 May
nuke13–40.0221%19 May
mirage6–13-0.0813%19 May
nuke7–13-0.0034%18 May
mirage13–10-0.0216%18 May
inferno16–140.0118%18 May
dust28–13-0.0516%18 May
dust213–9-0.0515%18 May
mirage13–7-0.0013%14 May
dust210–13-0.0333%14 May
inferno11–13-0.0613%14 May
anubis5–13-0.0333%14 May
nuke13–2-0.0417%14 May
ancient7–13-0.0424%14 May
mirage8–13-0.0215%12 May
nuke16–120.0912%12 May
inferno5–13-0.056%12 May
overpass13–40.0723%12 May
ancient14–16-0.0324%11 May
dust212–16-0.0916%11 May
nuke13–5-0.09100%11 May
cache7–13-0.0219%11 May
dust216–14-0.0314%10 May
inferno13–3-0.0225%10 May
mirage16–13-0.0216%10 May
dust216–14-0.0015%6 Feb
overpass7–13-0.0622%6 Feb
inferno2–6-0.110%6 Feb
inferno15–15-0.028%6 Feb
dust213–110.0119%6 Feb
dust213–8-0.0821%6 Feb
dust213–5-0.0416%6 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0126%5 Feb
dust213–80.0117%5 Feb
dust213–2-0.0131%5 Feb
dust211–130.0427%5 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →