gr.polyk

gr.polyk — CS2 Stats

76561198839386927[U:1:879121199]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

410Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since
556Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,069Purple band · top ~20.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 410 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 11 Oct 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,069 +1,292 11 Oct16 Sept · 34 days played
13,90817,653peak 17,65311 Oct16 Sept
17,791Peak Premier in tracked matches
37Days played since 2025-10-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 584 below peak (17,653)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,931 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-11
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches3
Win rate67%
K/D0.80
Headshot %61%

Measured 11 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,988), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate41.0%42.7%43.8%2.8% short
Shot accuracy11.0%11.2%12.0%1.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.760.991.020.26 short
Match win rate34.5%43.9%44.7%10.2% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgr.polykFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER17,069 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44
Positioning44
Utility21

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47485Last 10047%Win rateWTWLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.0pp headshot accuracy · +50ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 810ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 746ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 721ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim4.4
Utility2.1
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch2.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 701ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4
Positioning4.4
Utility2.1
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time706ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 700ms → last ⅓ avg 706ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−4.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.06Best match rating · 13–9 · mirage, 30 Apr
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · ancient, 9 Nov
406msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 16 Nov
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 9 Nov

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 48% over 31ancientWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC45202544%-0.04
dust2B31151648%-0.04
ancientC104640%-0.04
overpassC52340%-0.07
inferno42250%-0.04
anubis220100%0.00
nuke220100%-0.01
train1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

12,994Lifetime kills
0.76K/D
909Matches
34.5%Match win rate
41.0%Headshot %
11.0%Shot accuracy
1,049MVPs
445Hours (in match)
409Bombs planted
78Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,957dust2
240inferno
93nuke
49vertigo
38train
6ar_shoots
4ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

66Matches
42%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
63.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22050%1.1012.2
Mirage2035%0.7010.2
Ancient922%0.9116.0
Inferno650%0.8814.7
Anubis425%0.6611.3
Nuke475%0.9216.8
Train10%0.7311.0
Overpass1100%1.1110.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
74.5%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
701msReaction time
38.9%T opening success
28.6%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
1.3%Flash assists
4.20HE damage / grenade
4.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 700.6808ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3799 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.889% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–9-0.0519%16 May
mirage15–15-0.0120%8 May
anubis13–5-0.0322%2 May
overpass4–13-0.1310%2 May
mirage10–13-0.1112%2 May
dust27–13-0.1018%2 May
mirage13–90.0621%30 Apr
mirage13–80.0623%27 Apr
nuke13–70.0114%27 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0327%27 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0632%26 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0312%26 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0618%25 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0030%14 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0823%14 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0417%11 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0725%11 Apr
mirage13–9-0.028%9 Apr
ancient1–6-0.050%9 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0621%9 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0325%4 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0614%4 Apr
ancient13–100.0110%1 Apr
dust213–90.0118%1 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0715%20 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0611%19 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0521%14 Mar
dust213–11-0.0127%14 Mar
mirage13–10-0.029%14 Mar
dust29–13-0.0318%14 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0810%14 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0014%13 Mar
nuke16–14-0.0413%9 Mar
mirage13–8-0.058%9 Mar
dust213–70.0116%9 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0723%9 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0710%4 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0915%4 Mar
anubis13–100.0324%18 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0912%18 Feb
dust26–13-0.1311%18 Feb
dust216–12-0.0517%13 Feb
dust216–14-0.0213%20 Dec
inferno9–13-0.0218%19 Dec
mirage12–16-0.0919%25 Nov
dust28–13-0.0215%16 Nov
mirage7–13-0.1422%16 Nov
ancient13–80.0017%16 Nov
inferno13–8-0.0514%16 Nov
dust27–13-0.1013%16 Nov
dust215–15-0.0328%16 Nov
mirage13–90.0215%16 Nov
mirage5–13-0.0615%15 Nov
mirage13–10-0.0816%14 Nov
ancient13–16-0.0512%14 Nov
mirage7–13-0.0334%14 Nov
mirage6–13-0.047%14 Nov
mirage10–130.0230%14 Nov
dust210–13-0.088%14 Nov
mirage10–13-0.0810%12 Nov
mirage7–13-0.0615%12 Nov
dust213–4-0.0122%12 Nov
ancient13–7-0.0117%9 Nov
dust213–11-0.0811%9 Nov
ancient13–10-0.0644%9 Nov
mirage13–20.0021%9 Nov
dust26–13-0.0628%9 Nov
mirage13–7-0.0412%9 Nov
dust214–16-0.0228%9 Nov
dust21–13-0.0728%9 Nov
train6–13-0.0510%9 Nov
ancient14–16-0.049%6 Nov
mirage13–5-0.0535%6 Nov
dust213–70.0528%31 Oct
dust213–11-0.0522%31 Oct
dust26–13-0.0115%25 Oct
dust213–9-0.0428%25 Oct
mirage13–6-0.0210%25 Oct
mirage11–13-0.0120%25 Oct
mirage15–15-0.0318%25 Oct
dust213–9-0.0219%25 Oct
dust215–15-0.0420%19 Oct
mirage8–13-0.0818%19 Oct
mirage13–16-0.0626%19 Oct
mirage16–12-0.0223%18 Oct
dust213–9-0.0426%18 Oct
overpass13–8-0.0722%18 Oct
mirage15–150.0320%16 Oct
mirage13–60.0120%16 Oct
overpass7–13-0.0418%16 Oct
dust213–80.0018%16 Oct
dust213–16-0.0118%14 Oct
overpass11–13-0.0623%14 Oct
dust27–13-0.0333%14 Oct
dust210–13-0.0324%14 Oct
inferno13–40.0126%13 Oct
dust213–10-0.0630%13 Oct
dust26–13-0.0728%11 Oct
mirage1–9-0.0120%11 Oct
dust213–5-0.0614%11 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →