Bert Chintus

Bert Chintus — CS2 Stats

GB76561198832476479[U:1:872210751]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,164Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,513Top 50% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#60754 of 251264 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,256 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (32 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 21,513 → 21,513
0Faceit ELO · 1,256 → 1,256
+19Tracked matches · now 1,164
+1.7ppWin rate · 50.0% → 51.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,513 +1,406 4 Jul – 9 Sept · 10 days played
20,10723,456peak 23,4564 Jul9 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,256 +0 30 Aug – 9 Sept · 3 observations
1,2561,256peak 1,25630 Aug9 Sept
23,456Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,256Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-07-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,256
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 95 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,943 below peak (23,456)
  • -1,466 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,487 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBert ChintusFACEITLevel 7 · 1,256 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,513 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,256csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning54
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–42–6Last 10052%Win rateTWLWWLWWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating · −0.5pp headshot accuracy · +25ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.10
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 10

  • 6–2–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 20

  • 11–6–3 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility3.0
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch1.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.4
Utility3.0
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.05
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time524ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 524ms
Headshot accuracy22.0%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 9–0 · vertigo, 22 Sept →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · nuke, 22 Jul →
297msFastest reaction time · 0–9 · inferno, 25 Jul →
13–3Biggest win · overpass, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA3219–1359%-0.01
nukeC188–1044%-0.01
cacheC188–1044%-0.02
mirageS97–278%-0.01
overpassS65–183%0.07
anubisD61–517%-0.06
vertigoA53–260%0.07
poseidon—20–20%-0.07
ancient—20–20%-0.05
dust2—10–10%-0.01
boulder—11–0100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

342Matches
54%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
76.0ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5763%1.4414.8
Mirage3941%1.1515.7
Dust22454%1.2016.0
Nuke2268%1.1115.8
Ancient1850%1.1018.7
Anubis1631%0.9412.9
Overpass1669%0.9714.2
Cache1173%1.1313.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
517msReaction time
36.7%T opening success
45.1%CT opening success
0.31Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
7.10HE damage / grenade
2.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3144 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.6851% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–80.0819%2 Oct →
overpass9–10.2522%2 Oct →
inferno6–90.0244%2 Oct →
overpass13–3-0.0315%26 Sept →
vertigo9–30.1722%22 Sept →
poseidon6–9-0.0218%22 Sept →
nuke9–70.0828%22 Sept →
inferno9–60.0726%22 Sept →
vertigo9–00.2830%22 Sept →
nuke8–80.019%22 Sept →
overpass9–30.1916%22 Sept →
inferno9–60.0629%22 Sept →
inferno9–30.0641%22 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0518%18 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0120%18 Sept →
inferno9–50.0423%13 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0422%8 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0626%8 Sept →
nuke13–60.0517%8 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0327%8 Sept →
overpass7–9-0.130%6 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.0722%6 Sept →
vertigo9–30.0738%6 Sept →
nuke5–9-0.0318%6 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0522%6 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0413%5 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0819%2 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0517%2 Sept →
inferno13–50.0031%2 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0214%2 Sept →
nuke9–60.0133%30 Aug →
vertigo7–9-0.0111%30 Aug →
vertigo7–9-0.1520%30 Aug →
nuke9–40.1624%30 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0717%28 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0322%28 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0136%28 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0521%20 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0132%20 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0216%17 Aug →
cache6–13-0.059%17 Aug →
inferno13–50.069%12 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0638%12 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0014%12 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0219%12 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.1010%11 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0911%11 Aug →
cache13–60.0518%11 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0116%11 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0122%11 Aug →
inferno10–130.0026%11 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0019%10 Aug →
cache7–130.0014%10 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0218%10 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0215%10 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0130%5 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0318%4 Aug →
cache13–40.0325%29 Jul →
nuke13–100.0423%27 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0128%27 Jul →
mirage13–80.0124%26 Jul →
inferno13–16-0.0230%26 Jul →
mirage13–70.0013%26 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0219%26 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.073%26 Jul →
boulder13–40.1022%26 Jul →
cache13–11-0.048%25 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0426%25 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0612%25 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0315%25 Jul →
cache15–15-0.0416%25 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0141%25 Jul →
inferno0–9-0.250%25 Jul →
inferno2–9-0.0830%25 Jul →
nuke13–16-0.0614%23 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.019%23 Jul →
anubis13–3-0.0117%23 Jul →
cache13–16-0.0619%23 Jul →
nuke3–9-0.320%23 Jul →
inferno9–60.0914%23 Jul →
poseidon3–9-0.1217%23 Jul →
overpass9–40.1346%23 Jul →
mirage13–80.0221%23 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0516%22 Jul →
nuke3–130.0846%22 Jul →
inferno13–50.0427%22 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0125%22 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0823%22 Jul →
inferno2–13-0.0815%22 Jul →
mirage9–130.0026%21 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.0115%21 Jul →
cache11–130.0111%21 Jul →
cache13–8-0.0123%13 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0112%13 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0324%13 Jul →
inferno13–80.0537%9 Jul →
ancient15–15-0.0416%9 Jul →
inferno13–90.0019%4 Jul →
overpass13–6-0.0117%4 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0329%4 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.