伝説 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖌𝖑𝖎 — CS2 Stats

SK76561198824193830[U:1:863928102]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

657Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since

3,864Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingAll-Rounder

Premier CS Rating19,045Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#88585 of 231394 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,255 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 26 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,045 -240 26 Jul – 12 Sept · 25 days played

Faceit ELO: 1,255 +0 2 Sept – 10 Sept · 2 observations

20,963Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,255Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

35Days played since 2026-07-26

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,255
Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 96 to go
Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
Level 6 first seen 2026-09-02
Level 5 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

1,918 below peak (20,963)
-1,328 over 30 days · declining
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 955 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,717), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	43.5%	45.7%	46.8%	3.3% short
Shot accuracy	13.2%	12.7%	13.0%	meets
Kill/death ratio	0.87	1.05	1.06	0.19 short
Match win rate	34.1%	45.7%	46.3%	12.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68

Positioning42

Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–47–6Last 10047%Win rateLWWWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · +123ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 19%
Avg reaction 611ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 654ms

Last 20

8–11–1 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 21%
Avg reaction 593ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.8

Utility4.4

Positioning4.2

Opening Duels3.3

Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8

Positioning4.2

Utility4.4

Mechanics4.6

Opening Duels4.0

Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time566ms−51ms

first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms

Headshot accuracy20.4%+4.9%

first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–0 · ancient, 11 Aug →

53%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 14 Aug →

281msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · anubis, 26 Jul →

13–0Biggest win · ancient, 11 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

9–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 65% over 26anubisWeakest map · 18% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	41	21–20	51%	-0.02
dust2	S	26	17–9	65%	-0.03
anubis	D	11	2–9	18%	-0.04
ancient	C	8	3–5	38%	0.01
cache	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.00
inferno	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.06
nuke	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.04
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

91,633Lifetime kills

0.87K/D

5,189Matches

34.1%Match win rate

43.5%Headshot %

13.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players

12,157MVPs

2,671Hours (in match)

957Bombs planted

437Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4733,864

AWP15,486

M4A4 / M4A1-S14,190

Desert Eagle6,330

P2000 / USP-S2,464

SSG 082,127

Glock-182,020

P901,287

MP71,068

Knife960

Lifetime map wins

3,570dust2

2,959nuke

2,633inferno

1,338vertigo

657cbble

326train

174lake

115safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

89Matches

61%Win rate

1.04Avg K/D

79.6ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	34	62%	1.02	15.6
Dust2	19	68%	0.95	14.7
Ancient	8	100%	1.84	17.5
Anubis	7	14%	0.93	15.4
Cache	7	100%	1.21	16.1
Inferno	6	33%	0.75	13.7
Nuke	4	25%	0.89	11.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy

36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.3%Spray accuracy

70.9%Counter-strafing

8.9°Preaim

589msReaction time

34.1%T opening success

58.2%CT opening success

0.67Enemies flashed / flash

5.7%Flash assists

4.81HE damage / grenade

4.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.1355% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
vertigo	7–13	-0.10	6%	17 Sept →
mirage	13–8	-0.08	20%	15 Sept →
dust2	13–11	0.09	24%	15 Sept →
mirage	13–3	-0.00	25%	14 Sept →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	21%	13 Sept →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	26%	13 Sept →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	17%	12 Sept →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	31%	11 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.04	22%	8 Sept →
cache	4–13	0.02	29%	4 Sept →
anubis	4–12	0.06	19%	4 Sept →
anubis	13–5	-0.01	27%	4 Sept →
ancient	8–13	0.04	22%	2 Sept →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	25%	2 Sept →
dust2	9–13	0.01	19%	1 Sept →
inferno	2–9	-0.14	11%	1 Sept →
dust2	10–13	0.06	15%	31 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.09	18%	30 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.07	9%	30 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	32%	28 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.12	24%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.00	0%	24 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.04	25%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.04	29%	19 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	13%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.01	15%	17 Aug →
dust2	16–14	-0.02	17%	15 Aug →
mirage	17–19	-0.01	21%	15 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	9%	15 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.00	29%	15 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	19%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.00	26%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	28%	15 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.08	53%	14 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	16%	14 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.09	13%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.02	29%	14 Aug →
mirage	19–15	0.01	19%	13 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	22%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.09	21%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	29%	12 Aug →
mirage	12–2	0.00	25%	12 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	18%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–0	0.13	18%	11 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.08	8%	11 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	24%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.06	20%	11 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.13	14%	10 Aug →
mirage	16–12	-0.09	22%	10 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.06	7%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	8%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	8%	9 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	23%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.05	16%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.07	17%	8 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.03	11%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	29%	8 Aug →
anubis	15–19	-0.06	17%	7 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	12%	4 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	19%	4 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.00	21%	4 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	15%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.05	18%	4 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	16%	4 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.00	19%	4 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	7%	4 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.07	14%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.00	0%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.00	18%	2 Aug →
ancient	15–15	-0.04	9%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.11	12%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	24%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	24%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	12%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.07	9%	31 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.04	13%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.04	8%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	28%	30 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.09	24%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.10	13%	29 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.02	13%	29 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	15%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.04	15%	29 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.03	15%	29 Jul →
cache	1–13	0.00	21%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.00	20%	28 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.02	20%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	17%	28 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.04	22%	28 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.10	19%	28 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	8%	27 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.07	19%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.01	16%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.02	16%	27 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.10	0%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.02	22%	26 Jul →
mirage	8–0	0.03	30%	26 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.04	17%	26 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.11	0%	26 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	15%	26 Jul →