Sheldon Larp Cooper

Sheldon Larp Cooper — CS2 Stats

US76561198819800711[U:1:859534983]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

758Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,141Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.9 LearningClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 21 days played since 5 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,218 +3,280 5 Jun4 Jul · 20 days played
12,93819,341peak 19,3415 Jun4 Jul
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
21Days played since 2026-06-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,274), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate41.6%43.8%44.8%3.2% short
Shot accuracy14.2%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.861.021.040.17 short
Match win rate40.0%44.7%45.2%5.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSheldon Larp CooperFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning39
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55441Last 10055%Win rateWLLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · +31ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Last 10

  • 19 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 317 · 15% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility3.9
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch5.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning3.9
Utility3.9
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact0.6

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time574ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 582ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 7–0 · dust2, 14 Jun
43%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · dust2, 20 Jun
406msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · anubis, 2 Jul
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 26 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A26161062%-0.00
mirageA25151060%0.00
nukeB158753%0.00
ancientC125742%-0.02
overpassA85363%-0.00
anubisD61517%-0.02
cacheA53260%0.02
inferno32167%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

41,556Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
2,168Matches
40.0%Match win rate
41.6%Headshot %
14.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
3,804MVPs
1,141Hours (in match)
2,080Bombs planted
431Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,604dust2
2,752inferno
1,891nuke
789train
733vertigo
538office
158lake
124cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

108Matches
48%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
78.7ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1450%0.9011.9
Dust2560%1.2817.2
Nuke367%0.6913.7
Anubis250%1.0017.5
Cache10%1.4227.0
Inferno1100%1.3316.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
27.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.0%Spray accuracy
69.1%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
564msReaction time
22.5%T opening success
49.7%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
9.84HE damage / grenade
4.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4546 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.4518% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–8-0.0318%24 Jul
dust211–13-0.0224%24 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0611%4 Jul
mirage8–130.0025%4 Jul
dust211–130.0117%4 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0112%4 Jul
cache5–130.0719%4 Jul
mirage10–130.0516%4 Jul
ancient8–130.0431%4 Jul
ancient5–13-0.046%3 Jul
dust213–11-0.0619%3 Jul
dust26–13-0.0510%2 Jul
dust213–11-0.0412%2 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0329%2 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0815%2 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0215%2 Jul
cache11–130.0719%1 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0216%1 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0030%30 Jun
ancient1–9-0.0630%30 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0729%30 Jun
dust210–13-0.0523%30 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0326%30 Jun
dust213–7-0.0121%30 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0922%30 Jun
nuke4–00.0623%30 Jun
nuke13–80.0016%29 Jun
overpass13–110.0234%29 Jun
mirage10–30.0618%29 Jun
overpass13–50.0814%29 Jun
nuke13–60.0418%29 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0233%29 Jun
mirage13–20.0520%26 Jun
nuke13–10-0.067%26 Jun
dust29–13-0.0416%26 Jun
mirage13–60.0825%25 Jun
dust213–80.0424%25 Jun
dust29–130.0427%25 Jun
ancient5–13-0.056%25 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0119%25 Jun
nuke7–13-0.094%25 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0610%24 Jun
dust26–13-0.0819%24 Jun
overpass13–70.0316%24 Jun
cache13–7-0.0115%22 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0914%22 Jun
anubis9–130.0223%22 Jun
nuke13–16-0.0116%22 Jun
ancient13–40.0322%22 Jun
dust213–8-0.0417%21 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0318%21 Jun
overpass3–13-0.0322%21 Jun
dust213–6-0.0220%21 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0323%21 Jun
anubis13–30.0322%21 Jun
dust213–30.0119%21 Jun
nuke7–3-0.0019%21 Jun
dust213–6-0.0326%20 Jun
dust26–13-0.0443%20 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0312%20 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0420%20 Jun
mirage13–50.0629%20 Jun
dust210–130.0028%20 Jun
nuke13–70.0328%20 Jun
nuke13–110.0326%19 Jun
ancient13–30.0027%19 Jun
mirage6–13-0.069%19 Jun
mirage15–150.017%19 Jun
dust210–40.1024%19 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0925%15 Jun
dust213–8-0.0510%15 Jun
cache13–4-0.0135%15 Jun
mirage13–70.0420%15 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0928%15 Jun
ancient4–130.019%14 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0122%14 Jun
dust27–00.1318%14 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0116%14 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0113%14 Jun
dust213–90.0624%14 Jun
dust213–70.0121%13 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0026%13 Jun
inferno13–90.0417%13 Jun
mirage13–40.0222%11 Jun
nuke9–130.0820%11 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0316%10 Jun
dust213–11-0.0211%10 Jun
inferno13–30.1113%10 Jun
mirage13–30.0211%10 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0410%10 Jun
dust213–100.0317%10 Jun
dust210–13-0.0220%8 Jun
mirage13–40.0616%8 Jun
mirage13–110.0126%8 Jun
overpass13–60.0023%8 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0314%8 Jun
overpass13–60.0413%8 Jun
nuke13–100.1016%8 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0128%5 Jun
dust213–40.0613%5 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →