waifu enjoyer

waifu enjoyer — CS2 Stats

US76561198815019330[U:1:854753602]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,112Tracked matches40%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,425Hours in CS60Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,977Blue band · top ~44.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 11,977 → 11,977
+14Tracked matches · now 1,112
−3.3ppWin rate · 43.3% → 40.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 19 days played since 31 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,977 +1,461 4 Sept – 23 Sept · 5 days played
10,51612,161peak 12,1614 Sept23 Sept
12,378Peak Premier in tracked matches
19Days played since 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 184 below peak (12,161)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,023 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-23
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches223——
Win rate64%——
K/D1.36——
Headshot %56%——

Measured 29 Aug 2026 → 25 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,676), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate47.1%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy1.4%11.3%12.1%10.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.180.991.02above
Match win rate44.4%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGwaifu enjoyerFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER11,977 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning50
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–40–7Last 10053%Win rateLTLTTWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −8.3pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–2–3 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 10

  • 5–2–3 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 20

  • 6–9–5 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility4.1
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.0
Utility4.1
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time567ms+35ms
first ⅓ avg 531ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 31 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 5–0 · mirage, 10 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 12–0 · anubis, 24 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · office, 19 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
13–0In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 83% over 6overpassWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC166–1038%0.01
officeC166–1038%-0.00
nukeS1310–377%0.00
infernoB126–650%-0.00
dust2C83–538%-0.01
trainA74–357%0.02
anubisS75–271%-0.01
ancientS75–271%0.02
vertigoS65–183%-0.01
overpassD51–420%-0.02
mirage—21–150%-0.04
italy—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

51,337Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
2,939Matches
44.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
47.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
1.4%Shot accuracy
5,298MVPs
829Hours (in match)
1,098Bombs planted
664Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,690
MP75,328
AWP4,061
XM10141,288
P901,108
P250863

Lifetime map wins

3,607office
3,507dust2
1,835inferno
1,433nuke
1,056vertigo
458train
208italy
40cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

42Matches
48%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
77.8ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21258%1.0515.2
Mirage1242%0.7712.5
Anubis862%1.0014.9
Nuke333%1.1519.7
Inferno333%0.7211.0
Overpass250%1.2019.0
Ancient10%0.7814.0
Cache10%0.649.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
29.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.3%Spray accuracy
76.1%Counter-strafing
7.2°Preaim
580msReaction time
37.4%T opening success
35.0%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
5.64HE damage / grenade
8.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.4204% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–13-0.058%24 Sept →
train12–12-0.0411%24 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0516%24 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0413%24 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0417%24 Sept →
anubis12–0-0.0213%24 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0820%24 Sept →
vertigo13–110.006%24 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0410%24 Sept →
dust213–110.0513%24 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0026%24 Sept →
train12–120.0018%24 Sept →
vertigo3–13-0.0324%23 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0117%23 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0418%22 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0528%22 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.076%22 Sept →
overpass10–13-0.0227%21 Sept →
vertigo13–6-0.0029%21 Sept →
cache8–130.0119%21 Sept →
overpass4–13-0.0122%21 Sept →
vertigo13–8-0.108%20 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0116%20 Sept →
dust213–110.0215%20 Sept →
office7–13-0.0533%20 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0127%19 Sept →
overpass7–130.0222%19 Sept →
anubis13–100.0624%19 Sept →
office5–130.0438%19 Sept →
vertigo13–80.0231%19 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0421%19 Sept →
office13–40.1235%19 Sept →
office9–13-0.0518%19 Sept →
office13–00.0224%19 Sept →
office9–130.0120%19 Sept →
office13–10-0.0317%18 Sept →
office13–20.0128%18 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0433%18 Sept →
train13–100.0727%18 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0335%18 Sept →
office1–13-0.077%18 Sept →
office9–130.0319%18 Sept →
nuke13–80.0120%17 Sept →
cache2–5-0.0229%17 Sept →
office12–120.0222%17 Sept →
office13–5-0.0215%17 Sept →
nuke13–100.0316%17 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0416%17 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0118%13 Sept →
dust22–13-0.087%13 Sept →
ancient7–130.1030%13 Sept →
nuke13–110.0921%13 Sept →
cache13–110.0313%12 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0116%12 Sept →
anubis13–50.0512%12 Sept →
nuke8–2-0.050%12 Sept →
cache13–60.0527%12 Sept →
train13–110.0126%12 Sept →
cache15–150.0315%12 Sept →
inferno13–110.0920%12 Sept →
nuke13–50.0521%12 Sept →
inferno13–50.0233%12 Sept →
office9–130.0228%12 Sept →
office1–13-0.0122%11 Sept →
train13–60.0311%11 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0311%11 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0235%10 Sept →
mirage5–0-0.0450%10 Sept →
overpass13–10.0124%10 Sept →
cache13–80.0630%10 Sept →
inferno1–9-0.0625%10 Sept →
cache13–110.0516%9 Sept →
office7–13-0.0611%9 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.048%9 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0333%8 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0317%8 Sept →
cache13–100.1129%6 Sept →
inferno13–90.0825%6 Sept →
inferno13–30.0716%6 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0115%6 Sept →
ancient13–110.0317%6 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0729%6 Sept →
inferno9–7-0.0614%5 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0415%4 Sept →
nuke10–130.0219%4 Sept →
ancient5–00.0327%4 Sept →
italy13–100.0415%2 Sept →
train13–30.1232%2 Sept →
ancient13–60.0415%2 Sept →
office13–60.0138%2 Sept →
ancient13–110.0329%2 Sept →
nuke9–130.0321%2 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0518%31 Aug →
nuke13–40.1318%31 Aug →
dust210–130.0218%31 Aug →
overpass3–13-0.0831%31 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.1218%31 Aug →
train4–13-0.0514%31 Aug →
cache13–90.0218%31 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0521%31 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →