bara_marian

bara_marian — CS2 Stats

FI76561198813918589[U:1:853652861]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,233Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating27,496Top 5% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4394 of 259941 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,598 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+266Premier CS Rating · 27,230 → 27,496

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,496 +1,984 15 Oct – 4 Nov · 6 days played
25,51227,496peak 27,49615 Oct4 Nov
Faceit ELO: 2,598 +0 29 Aug – 5 Oct · 9 observations
2,5982,598peak 2,59829 Aug5 Oct
27,828Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,598Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,598
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 402 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 27,496
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,504 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbara_marianFACEITLevel 10 · 2,598 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER27,496 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,598csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning52
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–41Last 10059%Win rateLWWWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · +34ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.3
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 35% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.2
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time504ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 509ms → last ⅓ avg 504ms
Headshot accuracy22.5%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 25.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–9 · mirage, 18 Sept →
54%Best headshot accuracy · 7–9 · poseidon, 23 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · mirage, 3 Nov →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 30 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 16infernoWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2918–1162%-0.01
anubisS1612–475%-0.01
ancientB158–753%-0.04
cacheA138–562%-0.00
nukeA106–460%0.01
dust2B84–450%-0.03
infernoC83–538%-0.02
poseidon—10–10%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,413Matches
51%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
75.6ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage29854%0.9514.3
Nuke12452%0.9915.4
Ancient10842%0.9714.9
Dust27762%0.9414.1
Anubis6854%0.9515.0
Overpass3557%0.8815.1
Inferno3450%1.0615.4
Cache2744%1.1015.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.8%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
511msReaction time
57.1%T opening success
35.2%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
7.14HE damage / grenade
5.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.1986% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.0238%4 Nov →
cache13–110.0121%4 Nov →
nuke10–7-0.0423%4 Nov →
anubis13–10-0.0324%3 Nov →
ancient4–13-0.0636%3 Nov →
mirage13–40.0224%3 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0018%2 Nov →
ancient7–13-0.095%2 Nov →
anubis16–12-0.0333%31 Oct →
dust21–8-0.1311%31 Oct →
inferno13–2-0.0216%31 Oct →
dust213–50.0118%31 Oct →
ancient13–40.0113%31 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0128%31 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0420%28 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0231%28 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0035%25 Oct →
anubis16–12-0.0315%24 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0828%24 Oct →
nuke16–130.0535%24 Oct →
mirage12–16-0.0417%23 Oct →
anubis13–100.0221%19 Oct →
cache13–100.0018%19 Oct →
nuke13–90.0319%19 Oct →
anubis16–14-0.0118%18 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0222%17 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0731%17 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0237%17 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0314%17 Oct →
ancient19–17-0.0515%17 Oct →
mirage13–80.0028%17 Oct →
ancient9–130.0213%17 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0920%17 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0521%17 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0416%17 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0620%17 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0437%16 Oct →
anubis13–100.0423%16 Oct →
cache13–3-0.0327%16 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0130%15 Oct →
anubis13–50.0134%15 Oct →
inferno13–30.0618%15 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0621%15 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0626%15 Oct →
dust210–60.0431%15 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0219%13 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0322%13 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0522%13 Oct →
mirage13–50.0525%13 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0326%13 Oct →
mirage10–130.0020%12 Oct →
anubis16–14-0.0216%12 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0411%11 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0135%11 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0214%9 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0435%9 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0425%4 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0223%4 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0139%4 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0226%3 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0316%3 Oct →
nuke13–110.0124%3 Oct →
cache13–100.0034%3 Oct →
cache13–70.0123%30 Sept →
inferno13–10.0332%30 Sept →
mirage13–100.0127%30 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0440%27 Sept →
ancient13–90.0120%27 Sept →
ancient13–100.0322%27 Sept →
cache6–13-0.1023%27 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0931%27 Sept →
poseidon7–9-0.0754%23 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.127%23 Sept →
nuke13–90.0228%22 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0820%18 Sept →
anubis5–130.0422%18 Sept →
mirage13–90.0938%18 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0333%18 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.025%18 Sept →
anubis13–100.0314%18 Sept →
mirage13–110.0816%16 Sept →
cache13–20.0831%15 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0119%15 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0425%14 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0417%14 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0426%13 Sept →
nuke10–130.0817%13 Sept →
inferno10–130.0335%13 Sept →
cache11–130.0419%13 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0531%13 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0332%12 Sept →
nuke8–130.0228%12 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0338%10 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0427%10 Sept →
cache16–120.0116%9 Sept →
mirage13–60.0418%9 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0038%9 Sept →
mirage13–50.0234%9 Sept →
cache10–130.0327%7 Sept →
mirage7–130.0118%7 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.