Den mystiske Awper

Den mystiske Awper — CS2 Stats

76561198811890134[U:1:851624406]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,084Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,315 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,315 → 1,315
+37Tracked matches · now 1,084
−10.3ppWin rate · 58.6% → 48.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,608 -102 28 Jan – 21 Jun · 14 days played
15,60819,624peak 19,62428 Jan21 Jun
Faceit ELO: 1,315 +0 31 Aug – 30 Sept · 3 observations
1,3151,315peak 1,31531 Aug30 Sept
19,624Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,315Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-01-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,315
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 36 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDen mystiske AwperFACEITLevel 8 · 1,315 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,315csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning56
Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–51–3Last 10046%Win rateLLLLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −60pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · −42ms reaction

Win rate down 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 504ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility2.8
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.6
Utility2.8
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time571ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 9–5 · vertigo, 16 Feb →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · dust2, 18 Apr →
438msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · anubis, 11 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 19 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L5Current streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2112–957%0.01
ancientD196–1332%-0.01
anubisA1810–856%-0.02
mirageA138–562%-0.03
infernoD102–820%0.00
dust2D92–722%-0.00
cacheS54–180%-0.01
overpass—41–325%0.03
vertigo—11–0100%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

846Matches
50%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
81.2ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient17946%1.0617.2
Mirage14642%1.0215.8
Anubis14355%1.0516.6
Nuke12558%1.1117.5
Inferno11450%1.0316.1
Dust25544%0.9515.4
Overpass4168%1.2918.5
Cache2040%1.0517.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
78.4%Counter-strafing
7.4°Preaim
545msReaction time
40.9%T opening success
51.8%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
1.7%Flash assists
4.23HE damage / grenade
7.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3614 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis2–13-0.0927%11 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0721%11 Oct →
anubis7–130.0427%9 Oct →
nuke7–130.0126%9 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0623%18 Sept →
anubis13–50.0216%16 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0520%5 Sept →
nuke19–15-0.0125%1 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0030%18 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0530%17 Aug →
inferno5–130.017%12 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0017%6 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0225%4 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0414%3 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0218%26 Jul →
cache13–30.0045%14 Jul →
cache13–80.0225%12 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0513%6 Jul →
nuke13–60.0220%26 Jun →
mirage16–14-0.0133%21 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0320%15 Jun →
anubis13–110.0623%11 Jun →
overpass13–70.1123%7 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.0220%7 Jun →
anubis4–13-0.0315%6 Jun →
nuke13–70.0025%3 Jun →
inferno4–9-0.1318%1 Jun →
nuke9–20.1324%1 Jun →
cache12–12-0.0211%1 May →
cache13–10-0.0018%1 May →
inferno6–130.0217%27 Apr →
dust26–130.0014%27 Apr →
ancient22–180.0812%23 Apr →
dust220–220.0130%20 Apr →
dust213–40.0950%18 Apr →
nuke13–8-0.0730%18 Apr →
mirage14–16-0.0516%7 Apr →
nuke13–7-0.0130%7 Apr →
mirage13–9-0.108%24 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0228%23 Mar →
ancient11–13-0.0512%22 Mar →
ancient19–22-0.0612%22 Mar →
nuke13–110.0028%20 Mar →
anubis13–2-0.0214%19 Mar →
dust28–130.0014%19 Mar →
ancient5–13-0.0326%19 Mar →
nuke7–13-0.0234%19 Mar →
mirage13–8-0.0115%18 Mar →
nuke11–130.0320%18 Mar →
anubis13–10-0.0410%18 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0416%12 Mar →
inferno11–13-0.0428%12 Mar →
ancient15–150.0720%9 Mar →
nuke2–9-0.1225%8 Mar →
anubis13–90.0225%8 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0513%8 Mar →
ancient9–13-0.0519%5 Mar →
overpass9–130.0315%5 Mar →
dust211–13-0.0214%1 Mar →
ancient13–9-0.0129%28 Feb →
mirage13–9-0.0316%28 Feb →
nuke8–13-0.0511%28 Feb →
ancient7–13-0.0131%28 Feb →
nuke6–130.0413%28 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.0521%28 Feb →
ancient6–13-0.0115%28 Feb →
anubis6–13-0.1021%28 Feb →
nuke13–90.0714%25 Feb →
inferno10–130.0127%25 Feb →
dust213–7-0.0026%17 Feb →
overpass7–13-0.0215%16 Feb →
inferno13–90.0621%16 Feb →
nuke13–60.0918%16 Feb →
ancient2–13-0.0524%16 Feb →
nuke8–80.0926%16 Feb →
vertigo9–50.1621%16 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0418%16 Feb →
ancient8–13-0.0318%16 Feb →
anubis13–100.0413%12 Feb →
nuke13–4-0.0518%12 Feb →
ancient13–4-0.0414%12 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.039%12 Feb →
nuke9–130.0827%12 Feb →
anubis4–13-0.0426%12 Feb →
nuke8–130.0725%12 Feb →
mirage13–100.0221%11 Feb →
dust27–13-0.049%11 Feb →
anubis13–9-0.0219%11 Feb →
ancient13–5-0.036%11 Feb →
anubis13–5-0.0214%11 Feb →
mirage13–7-0.0927%11 Feb →
overpass7–13-0.0015%9 Feb →
anubis19–16-0.0318%4 Feb →
anubis11–13-0.0017%3 Feb →
ancient7–13-0.0124%29 Jan →
nuke13–110.0331%29 Jan →
mirage13–80.0719%29 Jan →
inferno13–20.0926%28 Jan →
ancient13–70.0826%28 Jan →
inferno13–160.0824%28 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.