no

no — CS2 Stats

76561198809275858[U:1:849010130]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

731Tracked matches67%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,046Hours in CS26Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,000Purple band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12663 of 19789 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 898 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnoFACEITLevel 5 · 898 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,000 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning42
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54424Last 10054%Win rateLWWLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0
Aggression3.2
Utility5.0
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.2
Utility5.0
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time575ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy14.7%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 13.3% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — nuke 9–0
130Biggest win — mirage
9Longest win streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 20nukeWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A26151158%0.02
mirageB23111248%-0.00
ancientS2015575%0.00
cacheC104640%-0.02
nukeD92722%-0.02
infernoB84450%0.02
anubis43175%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

17,106Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
927Matches
45.6%Match win rate
46.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
11.8%Shot accuracy
1,858MVPs
384Hours (in match)
663Bombs planted
218Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,026dust2
1,523inferno
782nuke
152train
48vertigo
44cbble
3lake
1stmarc

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

52Matches
56%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
70.5ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21953%1.0814.3
Mirage1250%0.8913.7
Ancient888%1.1414.9
Cache450%1.5813.5
Anubis3100%0.7812.0
Nuke20%0.539.0
Inferno250%0.9710.0
Overpass20%0.365.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
87.7%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
566msReaction time
24.1%T opening success
40.0%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
8.08HE damage / grenade
6.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.1094% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–13-0.0519%24 Aug
ancient13–70.019%24 Aug
dust213–100.0217%24 Aug
ancient2–13-0.096%24 Aug
dust213–80.0126%24 Aug
dust211–13-0.0110%23 Aug
cache9–13-0.0423%22 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0316%21 Aug
dust211–130.0425%21 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0117%21 Aug
ancient13–8-0.027%21 Aug
ancient13–90.009%20 Aug
ancient13–30.1313%20 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0310%19 Aug
mirage13–90.0112%19 Aug
mirage13–10-0.059%18 Aug
cache11–00.0412%18 Aug
dust213–80.0429%14 Aug
dust29–130.0815%13 Aug
ancient13–100.049%11 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0219%10 Aug
dust214–160.0313%9 Aug
ancient13–70.1010%9 Aug
dust213–40.1030%8 Aug
mirage13–80.066%8 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0316%8 Aug
inferno13–80.0422%8 Aug
inferno13–30.0210%7 Aug
anubis13–80.019%7 Aug
mirage11–130.0023%7 Aug
dust27–130.0110%7 Aug
ancient13–100.0615%7 Aug
nuke4–13-0.079%7 Aug
dust213–30.0816%7 Aug
inferno9–60.0510%7 Aug
ancient7–130.0113%6 Aug
mirage13–0-0.038%6 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0423%6 Aug
dust211–130.0318%6 Aug
mirage12–160.0420%6 Aug
inferno5–130.0016%6 Aug
dust213–11-0.0214%5 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0126%5 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0213%5 Aug
dust213–90.0314%5 Aug
ancient8–13-0.068%4 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0317%4 Aug
anubis13–110.0210%3 Aug
dust213–11-0.0213%3 Aug
mirage10–13-0.008%3 Aug
cache15–15-0.0017%2 Aug
dust29–130.0024%2 Aug
cache13–11-0.0512%2 Aug
dust213–50.019%2 Aug
ancient13–60.0031%2 Aug
mirage13–90.0216%2 Aug
dust213–60.0518%2 Aug
mirage15–19-0.0114%1 Aug
dust213–50.0715%1 Aug
nuke9–00.2419%1 Aug
inferno10–130.007%1 Aug
dust210–13-0.0318%1 Aug
cache15–15-0.0117%30 Jul
cache15–15-0.0115%30 Jul
inferno13–30.0319%30 Jul
mirage9–130.0318%30 Jul
mirage9–20.0215%30 Jul
cache15–150.0212%29 Jul
nuke3–13-0.1211%29 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0318%29 Jul
dust210–13-0.0411%28 Jul
dust213–9-0.0130%28 Jul
ancient13–70.0412%28 Jul
ancient13–70.0310%28 Jul
inferno10–130.0113%28 Jul
dust213–16-0.0820%28 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0217%28 Jul
cache16–13-0.049%28 Jul
dust29–50.0115%27 Jul
ancient5–130.0114%27 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0110%27 Jul
anubis13–16-0.008%27 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0521%26 Jul
nuke8–13-0.046%26 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0120%26 Jul
cache5–13-0.0221%26 Jul
dust29–13-0.026%26 Jul
ancient13–4-0.039%26 Jul
mirage13–70.0414%26 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0110%25 Jul
dust213–110.0015%25 Jul
nuke13–20.0414%25 Jul
inferno14–16-0.027%25 Jul
cache13–9-0.0510%25 Jul
mirage8–13-0.083%24 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0614%24 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0512%24 Jul
ancient11–13-0.038%23 Jul
dust216–130.0320%22 Jul
mirage13–40.0121%22 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →