danzy

danzy — CS2 Stats

IE76561198796668973[U:1:836403245]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,008Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
8,142Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating25,903Top 10% of 210,584 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13950 of 257705 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,324 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (25 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 25,903 → 25,903
0Faceit ELO · 2,324 → 2,324
+3Tracked matches · now 4,008
0.0ppWin rate · 58.6% → 58.6%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,903 +2,241 22 Jun – 1 Oct · 15 days played
23,66225,903peak 25,90322 Jun1 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,324 +0 2 Sept – 1 Oct · 6 observations
2,3242,324peak 2,3242 Sept1 Oct
25,903Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,324Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-06-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,324
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 176 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,903
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,507 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,097 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches1024−14
Win rate60%33%+27pp
K/D1.231.36−0.13
Headshot %51%81%−30pp

Measured 26 Sep 2026 → 26 Oct 2026; previous 1 Sep 2026 → 26 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate60.8%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy13.9%13.2%13.7%meets
Kill/death ratio0.961.071.090.13 short
Match win rate49.2%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdanzyFACEITLevel 9 · 2,324 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,903 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,324csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning61
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–39–2Last 10059%Win rateWWLTLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility6.3
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.1
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time556ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy24.8%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 25.7% → last ⅓ avg 24.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 4–0 · cache, 16 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · dust2, 26 Jun →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 26 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 26 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
10–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 17anubisWeakest map · 50% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2717–1063%0.01
anubisB2010–1050%0.03
infernoS1711–665%0.02
nukeA159–660%0.03
mirageA127–558%0.04
cacheB84–450%0.04
dust2—11–0100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

245,038Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
8,284Matches
49.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
60.8%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 9 players
13.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
27,075MVPs
8,142Hours (in match)
8,752Bombs planted
1,729Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47112,655
AWP19,189
FAMAS3,505
Knife3,113
P2503,104

Lifetime map wins

32,688office
10,996inferno
4,493nuke
4,004dust2
2,414vertigo
2,095train
196cbble
27italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,028Matches
50%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
78.5ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient32656%1.1817.1
Mirage26442%1.1216.2
Anubis25752%1.0916.1
Nuke14345%1.0515.6
Inferno5153%1.0816.0
Overpass2638%1.1015.8
Dust22532%1.0015.0
Train2339%0.9614.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.7%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
84.6%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
547msReaction time
31.9%T opening success
50.6%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
8.25HE damage / grenade
12.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.9342% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno19–150.0523%22 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0415%20 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0121%14 Sept →
anubis12–120.0336%13 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0422%12 Sept →
nuke13–40.0825%7 Sept →
anubis14–160.0328%7 Sept →
nuke13–110.0720%7 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0038%6 Sept →
cache5–130.0331%6 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0021%26 Aug →
nuke13–60.0235%26 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0324%26 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0117%11 Aug →
nuke8–130.0327%11 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0224%11 Aug →
ancient13–70.0417%10 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0130%10 Aug →
mirage13–110.0026%8 Aug →
ancient13–100.0121%8 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0320%8 Aug →
nuke13–100.0923%6 Aug →
ancient13–110.0220%6 Aug →
anubis13–60.0126%6 Aug →
ancient13–100.0422%5 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0234%5 Aug →
anubis8–130.0235%5 Aug →
nuke13–50.1322%5 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0427%4 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0011%4 Aug →
inferno13–80.0725%4 Aug →
mirage9–130.0431%3 Aug →
inferno13–100.0418%3 Aug →
mirage13–110.0125%3 Aug →
mirage13–50.0328%30 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0224%30 Jul →
inferno13–60.0142%30 Jul →
ancient13–100.0222%29 Jul →
inferno16–140.0016%29 Jul →
nuke5–130.0221%29 Jul →
ancient13–80.0224%27 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0416%27 Jul →
anubis12–16-0.0017%27 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0416%26 Jul →
ancient13–100.1020%25 Jul →
mirage7–130.0442%25 Jul →
mirage13–100.1132%25 Jul →
cache10–130.0138%23 Jul →
inferno11–130.0323%23 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.0230%23 Jul →
inferno15–150.0917%20 Jul →
anubis13–60.1013%20 Jul →
cache13–90.0218%20 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.0316%20 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0227%19 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0218%19 Jul →
nuke8–130.0113%19 Jul →
ancient13–50.0927%18 Jul →
anubis11–130.0513%18 Jul →
ancient13–80.1426%18 Jul →
mirage13–160.0316%18 Jul →
anubis13–80.0518%18 Jul →
anubis13–20.0429%18 Jul →
mirage13–80.1323%17 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0128%16 Jul →
cache4–00.1538%16 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.0334%16 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0232%16 Jul →
nuke13–20.0239%16 Jul →
inferno13–90.0222%15 Jul →
cache5–130.017%15 Jul →
anubis13–90.0228%15 Jul →
cache13–16-0.0127%13 Jul →
cache13–70.0444%13 Jul →
anubis10–130.0215%13 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0015%12 Jul →
nuke13–90.0023%12 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0233%8 Jul →
anubis13–110.0830%8 Jul →
nuke13–4-0.0015%8 Jul →
cache13–40.0515%8 Jul →
anubis13–110.0717%2 Jul →
inferno13–110.0110%2 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0519%2 Jul →
inferno13–60.0731%1 Jul →
ancient13–20.0435%1 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0135%1 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0213%29 Jun →
mirage16–130.0339%29 Jun →
mirage13–60.0731%29 Jun →
anubis13–50.0435%26 Jun →
dust213–00.1150%26 Jun →
nuke4–13-0.0519%25 Jun →
ancient13–90.0424%25 Jun →
inferno13–90.0722%24 Jun →
nuke13–80.0720%22 Jun →
inferno10–130.0032%22 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0024%21 Jun →
ancient3–13-0.0228%21 Jun →
anubis3–130.0720%21 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.