EPSON

EPSON — CS2 Stats

CG76561198796279000[U:1:836013272]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,281Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,313Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,594Purple band · top ~14.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#90620 of 221405 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,511 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,281 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 15 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,594 +0 30 Jun5 Sept · 2 days played
18,59418,594peak 18,59430 Jun5 Sept
18,594Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,511Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-05-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,511
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 20 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 18,594
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,406 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches40
Win rate75%
K/D0.71
Headshot %64%

Measured 8 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 8 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate47.5%46.8%48.3%meets
Shot accuracy15.2%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.791.061.070.28 short
Match win rate45.9%46.3%46.9%1.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEPSONFACEITLevel 8 · 1,511 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER18,594 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,511csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning46
Utility8

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54451Last 10054%Win rateLWWWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility0.8
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning4.6
Utility0.8
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time517ms−65ms
first ⅓ avg 582ms → last ⅓ avg 517ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–8 · mirage, 18 Aug
53%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · ancient, 7 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 19 Aug
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 13 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
49In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 18anubisWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA35211460%-0.02
ancientB22111150%-0.02
anubisC1971237%-0.02
infernoS1812667%0.00
dust221150%-0.06
overpass220100%0.01
cache1010%-0.04
vertigo1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

92,977Lifetime kills
0.79K/D
4,299Matches
45.9%Match win rate
47.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
15.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
11,394MVPs
2,313Hours (in match)
3,417Bombs planted
1,741Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4737,961
AWP8,152
SG 5532,465
SSG 082,465
UMP-452,282
FAMAS1,974
AUG1,804

Lifetime map wins

9,932inferno
1,653dust2
1,123vertigo
1,056train
837nuke
540cbble
360office
226lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

930Matches
51%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
69.4ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage13545%0.9413.9
Ancient9551%0.9114.8
Inferno8159%1.0114.4
Anubis4549%0.9314.4
Overpass4262%0.9714.8
Vertigo1926%0.8515.2
Dust21644%0.8411.6
Train3100%0.9612.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.1%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
513msReaction time
31.4%T opening success
43.7%CT opening success
0.03Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
5.02HE damage / grenade
0.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.0343 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.4178% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–130.0024%2 Sept
inferno13–90.0123%1 Sept
anubis13–110.0117%1 Sept
mirage16–13-0.0314%1 Sept
mirage13–80.0020%31 Aug
anubis9–130.017%31 Aug
mirage13–90.0115%31 Aug
dust25–13-0.0730%31 Aug
inferno16–120.0229%31 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0312%31 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0612%27 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0719%27 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0612%27 Aug
anubis7–130.0022%26 Aug
mirage15–19-0.0523%26 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0321%26 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0713%23 Aug
mirage2–13-0.066%23 Aug
mirage13–50.0721%21 Aug
ancient14–160.0218%21 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0217%21 Aug
mirage13–11-0.055%20 Aug
cache7–9-0.0421%20 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0318%20 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0520%20 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0223%19 Aug
inferno7–130.0021%19 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0419%18 Aug
ancient13–100.0715%18 Aug
mirage13–80.0911%18 Aug
anubis13–40.0420%18 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0022%17 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0421%17 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0812%17 Aug
inferno13–30.0527%17 Aug
mirage13–00.0621%13 Aug
anubis13–50.0136%13 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0915%13 Aug
inferno16–19-0.0033%13 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0216%13 Aug
ancient13–100.0224%12 Aug
inferno16–130.0435%11 Aug
ancient13–50.0519%11 Aug
ancient13–60.0210%10 Aug
mirage8–13-0.018%10 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0516%10 Aug
dust213–9-0.0511%10 Aug
mirage13–6-0.076%9 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0420%9 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0323%9 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0015%9 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0424%7 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0122%7 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0711%7 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0853%7 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0219%6 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0412%6 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0626%6 Aug
ancient16–19-0.0311%6 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0718%6 Aug
vertigo13–16-0.0418%5 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0420%5 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0615%5 Aug
ancient13–90.0120%30 Jun
inferno13–50.0319%30 Jun
mirage13–4-0.028%24 Jun
anubis0–4-0.120%24 Jun
inferno13–90.0112%21 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0613%21 Jun
anubis10–13-0.087%16 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0217%15 Jun
mirage6–13-0.049%15 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0514%15 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0525%13 Jun
inferno13–100.0114%12 Jun
anubis16–14-0.018%12 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0513%11 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0322%11 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0113%11 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0814%11 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0411%26 May
ancient10–13-0.0526%26 May
ancient12–16-0.0218%26 May
mirage13–6-0.0314%21 May
inferno13–90.0220%20 May
anubis3–13-0.0621%20 May
overpass13–4-0.0118%18 May
mirage13–60.0329%18 May
anubis9–13-0.0317%17 May
inferno13–40.0829%17 May
ancient13–9-0.0432%17 May
mirage13–50.0210%17 May
anubis13–9-0.0211%17 May
mirage22–25-0.0422%17 May
overpass13–60.0212%16 May
inferno7–130.0333%16 May
ancient13–10-0.0220%16 May
anubis13–30.0217%16 May
mirage13–10-0.0311%15 May
anubis13–50.0618%15 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →