Nicki Mirage;)

Nicki Mirage;) — CS2 Stats

RU76561198788107714[U:1:827841986]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

434Tracked matches56%Win rate2025Tracked since
522Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,010Top 50% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#80195 of 252684 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (27 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,010 +13,368 27 Jul – 20 Sept · 22 days played
6,64220,418peak 20,41827 Jul20 Sept
20,530Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-07-27

Premier CS Rating

  • 408 below peak (20,418)
  • +1,329 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,990 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,312), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate40.7%42.7%43.7%3.1% short
Shot accuracy0.0%11.3%12.0%12.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.020.991.02meets
Match win rate46.6%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNicki Mirage;)FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER20,010 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning41
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61–34–5Last 10061%Win rateLWTWTWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · −32ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–1–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

  • 5–3–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility3.3
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning4.1
Utility3.3
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact6.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time565ms−82ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 2 Aug →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · inferno, 20 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · dust2, 21 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 7 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
5–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 89% over 9dust2Weakest map · 44% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2511–1444%-0.01
mirageS2315–865%-0.01
cacheA1811–761%0.00
ancientS129–375%0.01
infernoS98–189%-0.01
anubisA85–363%-0.03
nuke—42–250%-0.03
train—10–10%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

9,257Lifetime kills
1.02K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
575Matches
46.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
40.7%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,139MVPs
210Hours (in match)
192Bombs planted
134Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,488dust2
549nuke
511inferno
88vertigo
74train
18office
3italy
3ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

33Matches
48%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
70.7ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1040%0.8512.1
Dust2862%0.8513.1
Cache540%1.0715.4
Ancient30%0.7510.7
Nuke2100%1.8012.0
Anubis250%1.3017.0
Inferno2100%0.7013.0
Overpass10%0.7110.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.1%Spray accuracy
73.8%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
554msReaction time
22.4%T opening success
41.3%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
3.47HE damage / grenade
4.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.4182% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0614%20 Sept →
inferno16–140.029%14 Sept →
train12–120.0319%10 Sept →
dust213–50.038%10 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0115%5 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.018%5 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0015%5 Sept →
ancient2–8-0.0643%2 Sept →
dust21–13-0.1120%2 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0710%2 Sept →
mirage13–70.0125%2 Sept →
ancient13–90.0317%2 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0422%1 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0720%21 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.1017%21 Aug →
cache16–130.0314%21 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0121%21 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.016%21 Aug →
mirage13–40.0418%20 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0829%20 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0417%20 Aug →
inferno9–1-0.0244%20 Aug →
anubis15–150.039%20 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0819%19 Aug →
dust213–70.0413%19 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0319%18 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0014%18 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0321%14 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0210%14 Aug →
ancient0–9-0.075%14 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0613%14 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0419%14 Aug →
anubis0–13-0.0711%14 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0320%14 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0523%14 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.056%13 Aug →
cache13–16-0.0314%13 Aug →
dust27–13-0.067%11 Aug →
dust20–7-0.0633%9 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.098%8 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0224%8 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0214%8 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0216%8 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0219%8 Aug →
cache13–30.0038%7 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0318%7 Aug →
inferno15–150.0215%7 Aug →
dust213–40.0311%7 Aug →
ancient13–10.0933%7 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0324%7 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0732%7 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.087%7 Aug →
mirage13–60.0011%7 Aug →
mirage13–70.0626%7 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0120%7 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0510%5 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0113%5 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.067%5 Aug →
inferno13–50.0021%5 Aug →
cache14–160.0115%5 Aug →
mirage13–50.0115%4 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0617%4 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0410%3 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0222%3 Aug →
dust213–50.038%3 Aug →
mirage9–130.0413%3 Aug →
dust213–30.0517%3 Aug →
ancient13–80.0812%3 Aug →
cache13–40.069%3 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.045%3 Aug →
cache13–30.0614%3 Aug →
ancient13–50.0216%2 Aug →
dust213–80.1518%2 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0412%2 Aug →
anubis16–130.0212%2 Aug →
anubis13–2-0.058%2 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0112%2 Aug →
cache13–160.0117%2 Aug →
mirage13–100.0015%2 Aug →
dust213–110.129%2 Aug →
ancient13–60.108%2 Aug →
cache13–80.0817%2 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.069%2 Aug →
dust28–130.0118%2 Aug →
cache16–13-0.0118%1 Aug →
mirage13–50.0313%1 Aug →
nuke13–80.0418%1 Aug →
cache13–50.0117%1 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0323%29 Jul →
ancient10–40.0210%29 Jul →
cache13–90.0314%29 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0212%29 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0211%29 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0340%29 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0917%29 Jul →
inferno13–70.0213%27 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0313%27 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0111%27 Jul →
mirage7–130.0010%27 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0517%27 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.