Kavertz

Kavertz — CS2 Stats

76561198663756166[U:1:703490438]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

132Tracked matches63%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,150Top 50% of 213,740 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#97562 of 260208 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Oct 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,150 +5,907 8 Sept – 23 Oct · 26 days played
12,55819,150peak 19,1508 Sept23 Oct
19,161Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,150
  • +1,836 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 850 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKavertzPREMIER19,150 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning74
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT65–31–4Last 10065%Win rateWWTWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +2.6pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.10
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 8–1–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 13–5–2 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.4
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels6.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning7.4
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels7.7
Win Impact9.3

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time548ms+25ms
first ⅓ avg 523ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–6 · dust2, 6 Nov →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 9–5 · inferno, 2 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · nuke, 4 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2116–576%0.02
ancientS2117–481%0.03
mirageC167–944%0.01
nukeS1511–473%0.02
anubisD103–730%-0.00
cacheC83–538%0.01
infernoS65–183%0.00
vertigo—33–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
39.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
553msReaction time
58.9%T opening success
62.3%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
5.92HE damage / grenade
6.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–60.1924%6 Nov →
ancient13–90.1016%6 Nov →
mirage12–120.0822%6 Nov →
ancient13–20.0925%23 Oct →
dust213–160.0419%15 Oct →
ancient13–80.0518%15 Oct →
nuke13–70.1427%15 Oct →
dust213–110.0327%14 Oct →
ancient13–90.0429%14 Oct →
ancient13–80.0020%12 Oct →
dust213–90.1222%11 Oct →
inferno13–110.1126%11 Oct →
inferno13–0-0.0517%11 Oct →
anubis15–150.0826%11 Oct →
ancient7–130.0928%11 Oct →
anubis10–130.0320%11 Oct →
ancient4–7-0.069%9 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0416%8 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0327%8 Oct →
dust28–4-0.0110%8 Oct →
ancient13–90.0513%8 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0017%7 Oct →
cache0–5-0.080%7 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0813%29 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0315%27 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0024%26 Sept →
nuke13–110.0922%26 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0417%25 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0719%24 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0628%24 Sept →
vertigo13–50.1023%23 Sept →
mirage6–130.0123%23 Sept →
dust210–130.0117%22 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0418%21 Sept →
ancient13–20.0819%21 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0422%21 Sept →
ancient13–70.0215%21 Sept →
inferno16–12-0.0122%20 Sept →
dust213–60.0225%20 Sept →
nuke16–14-0.0313%20 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0317%17 Sept →
mirage13–50.0216%16 Sept →
ancient16–140.0115%16 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0211%16 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.1027%15 Sept →
dust213–70.0118%15 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0123%13 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0014%13 Sept →
nuke13–60.0316%13 Sept →
inferno13–80.0119%13 Sept →
cache11–130.0420%11 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0415%11 Sept →
ancient13–50.018%11 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.027%10 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0420%10 Sept →
nuke13–70.0324%10 Sept →
dust213–80.0416%10 Sept →
mirage3–130.0312%9 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0119%9 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0523%9 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0325%8 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0423%8 Sept →
ancient13–10.0218%8 Sept →
anubis13–30.0316%8 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.016%8 Sept →
nuke13–40.0320%8 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0116%7 Sept →
vertigo13–30.0517%7 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0513%7 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0111%7 Sept →
anubis0–13-0.0710%7 Sept →
mirage13–160.0229%7 Sept →
ancient8–130.0222%7 Sept →
mirage13–50.0915%7 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0016%6 Sept →
ancient13–60.1015%5 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0121%5 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.107%5 Sept →
dust213–110.0635%5 Sept →
nuke2–130.0236%4 Sept →
ancient13–110.0924%4 Sept →
nuke13–50.0514%3 Sept →
ancient13–110.000%3 Sept →
mirage13–40.1036%3 Sept →
nuke13–30.0221%2 Sept →
inferno9–50.0539%2 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0114%2 Sept →
dust213–40.0022%2 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0116%2 Sept →
cache13–30.0817%2 Sept →
anubis10–130.0219%1 Sept →
cache13–80.0215%30 Aug →
dust26–00.0125%30 Aug →
nuke13–20.1028%30 Aug →
dust213–100.0113%30 Aug →
cache5–130.1019%30 Aug →
dust21–00.010%30 Aug →
vertigo13–6-0.0510%30 Aug →
mirage13–90.0432%30 Aug →
ancient11–30.0620%30 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.