𝖕𝖊𝖊𝖕𝟞𝟞𝟞 — CS2 Stats

DK76561198638697283[U:1:678431555]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

109Tracked matches37%Win rate2026Tracked since

CSDB Rating3.0 LearningPositional Player

Premier CS Rating2,656Grey band · top ~88.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#210257 of 261529 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 2,656 -955 26 Oct – 1 Nov · 6 days played

3,713Peak Premier in tracked matches

31Days played since 2026-09-25

Premier CS Rating

1,000 below peak (3,656)
Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 — 2,344 to go

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim29

Positioning47

Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD35–59–6Last 10035%Win rateWLLWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · −58ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 13%
Avg reaction 666ms

Last 10

3–7 · 30% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 13%
Avg reaction 660ms

Last 20

7–13 · 35% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 14%
Avg reaction 688ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim2.9

Utility4.1

Positioning4.7

Opening Duels1.3

Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 65% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 693ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.9

Positioning4.7

Utility4.1

Mechanics3.4

Opening Duels3.2

Win Impact0.6

Composite 3.0/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time693ms+15ms

first ⅓ avg 678ms → last ⅓ avg 693ms

Headshot accuracy13.5%−2.9%

first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 13.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 7 Nov →

42%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · inferno, 3 Oct →

461msFastest reaction time · 1–7 · mirage, 18 Oct →

13–0Biggest win · anubis, 23 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak

7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 60% over 5cacheWeakest map · 13% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	22	9–13	41%	0.01
inferno	B	18	9–9	50%	-0.03
dust2	D	16	3–13	19%	-0.00
anubis	D	11	3–8	27%	-0.05
cache	D	8	1–7	13%	-0.03
nuke	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.06
office	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.03
vertigo	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.01
train	—	4	3–1	75%	0.02
ancient	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.12
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.17
italy	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1Matches

0%Win rate

0.31Avg K/D

31.1ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.5%Headshot accuracy

30.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

30.7%Spray accuracy

65.2%Counter-strafing

10.5°Preaim

693msReaction time

50.3%T opening success

35.4%CT opening success

0.39Enemies flashed / flash

1.9%Flash assists

6.86HE damage / grenade

11.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.4575% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3851 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 35.4166% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	9–3	0.15	11%	7 Nov →
nuke	2–9	-0.19	25%	7 Nov →
anubis	1–9	-0.12	0%	1 Nov →
inferno	13–10	0.06	11%	31 Oct →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	17%	30 Oct →
office	9–13	-0.04	10%	30 Oct →
inferno	5–13	-0.07	10%	29 Oct →
mirage	11–13	0.02	14%	28 Oct →
dust2	13–16	-0.04	16%	26 Oct →
anubis	13–10	0.02	16%	26 Oct →
nuke	6–13	0.00	12%	25 Oct →
cache	3–13	-0.04	32%	25 Oct →
dust2	13–6	0.08	12%	25 Oct →
anubis	10–13	-0.08	7%	25 Oct →
mirage	13–5	0.00	17%	25 Oct →
mirage	6–13	0.11	10%	25 Oct →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	13%	25 Oct →
cache	1–13	-0.10	11%	25 Oct →
cache	13–4	-0.03	12%	25 Oct →
mirage	9–0	0.00	22%	24 Oct →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	24%	24 Oct →
nuke	13–11	0.01	11%	24 Oct →
anubis	1–8	-0.16	25%	24 Oct →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	10%	24 Oct →
anubis	13–0	0.09	19%	23 Oct →
dust2	7–13	0.05	11%	21 Oct →
anubis	6–13	-0.06	22%	21 Oct →
anubis	2–13	-0.08	6%	21 Oct →
mirage	13–10	0.03	11%	21 Oct →
mirage	5–13	0.00	10%	20 Oct →
inferno	13–7	0.05	9%	20 Oct →
mirage	1–7	-0.12	0%	18 Oct →
dust2	4–13	-0.09	10%	18 Oct →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	17%	18 Oct →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	8%	18 Oct →
nuke	13–6	-0.09	18%	17 Oct →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	11%	17 Oct →
mirage	13–6	-0.04	18%	17 Oct →
cache	3–13	-0.05	8%	17 Oct →
mirage	4–13	0.07	5%	17 Oct →
dust2	9–13	0.04	7%	17 Oct →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	7%	17 Oct →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	9%	16 Oct →
mirage	13–2	0.04	14%	16 Oct →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	12%	16 Oct →
inferno	9–4	-0.05	9%	16 Oct →
inferno	6–9	-0.18	33%	16 Oct →
inferno	9–7	-0.02	11%	16 Oct →
office	0–9	-0.12	17%	15 Oct →
mirage	13–4	0.04	13%	14 Oct →
mirage	13–4	0.02	22%	14 Oct →
dust2	11–13	0.02	22%	13 Oct →
inferno	12–12	-0.05	18%	13 Oct →
inferno	2–13	-0.00	5%	13 Oct →
anubis	12–12	-0.10	0%	12 Oct →
inferno	9–13	-0.08	10%	12 Oct →
cache	9–13	-0.05	16%	11 Oct →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	14%	11 Oct →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	11%	11 Oct →
dust2	12–12	-0.02	10%	11 Oct →
vertigo	13–11	0.06	14%	11 Oct →
vertigo	13–5	0.06	8%	11 Oct →
mirage	8–13	0.01	13%	11 Oct →
cache	4–13	-0.05	15%	11 Oct →
ancient	6–13	-0.12	5%	11 Oct →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	6%	11 Oct →
overpass	0–13	-0.17	0%	11 Oct →
dust2	2–11	0.01	15%	10 Oct →
nuke	10–10	-0.07	4%	10 Oct →
mirage	8–13	0.01	21%	10 Oct →
train	4–13	-0.00	24%	8 Oct →
mirage	13–1	0.11	14%	8 Oct →
train	9–6	0.01	10%	7 Oct →
train	13–6	0.08	23%	7 Oct →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	19%	5 Oct →
train	13–7	-0.01	17%	4 Oct →
italy	12–12	-0.04	7%	4 Oct →
office	5–13	-0.06	0%	3 Oct →
dust2	2–13	-0.05	16%	3 Oct →
inferno	1–13	-0.04	42%	3 Oct →
inferno	13–9	0.01	13%	3 Oct →
mirage	9–13	0.06	26%	3 Oct →
office	13–11	0.08	17%	3 Oct →
poseidon	9–4	-0.09	23%	2 Oct →
inferno	8–8	-0.02	25%	2 Oct →
inferno	9–7	-0.05	12%	2 Oct →
inferno	7–9	-0.05	27%	2 Oct →
inferno	13–8	-0.08	29%	2 Oct →
office	4–13	-0.02	14%	30 Sept →
vertigo	3–13	-0.11	13%	29 Sept →
vertigo	13–5	0.01	11%	26 Sept →
cache	12–12	0.07	14%	26 Sept →
office	4–13	0.00	20%	26 Sept →
anubis	8–0	0.01	0%	25 Sept →
vertigo	7–13	-0.06	10%	25 Sept →
inferno	2–13	-0.10	8%	25 Sept →
mirage	5–13	0.00	8%	25 Sept →
dust2	6–5	0.11	18%	25 Sept →
cache	3–13	0.01	16%	25 Sept →
dust2	1–13	0.01	25%	25 Sept →