-tecanyahu — CS2 Stats

76561198452811875[U:1:492546147]

2,019Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,242Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1074 of 10630 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,916 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG-tecanyahuFACEITLevel 10 · 2,916 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,242 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning64
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50464Last 10050%Win rateWWWWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9
Aggression9.1
Utility3.4
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.4
Utility3.4
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time546ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 542ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.42Best rating — nuke 9–1
130Biggest win — nuke
7Longest win streak
W4Current streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 10dust2Weakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA29171259%0.01
mirageA25141156%0.03
dust2D1441029%0.04
nukeA106460%0.09
infernoA74357%0.05
cacheA53260%0.10
anubis41325%0.04
overpass4040%-0.00
vertigo1010%-0.03
train110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,849Matches
54%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
88.6ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage50956%1.2618.5
Ancient39156%1.2718.4
Dust221648%1.2417.5
Inferno16744%1.2418.6
Nuke10959%1.2017.8
Overpass7851%1.3519.1
Anubis7658%1.2617.7
Train4470%1.3220.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.5%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
532msReaction time
36.5%T opening success
57.6%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
5.77HE damage / grenade
3.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3965 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.5056% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–110.0519%27 Aug
ancient19–170.0123%20 Aug
nuke13–90.0215%19 Aug
mirage19–15-0.0230%18 Aug
ancient9–130.0325%18 Aug
dust213–40.0224%17 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0221%16 Aug
dust27–13-0.0415%16 Aug
nuke13–40.138%10 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0128%7 Aug
mirage13–60.1224%7 Aug
mirage10–130.1126%27 Jul
dust27–13-0.0220%23 Jul
anubis13–70.0326%21 Jul
cache14–16-0.0115%21 Jul
mirage13–80.0324%20 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0025%20 Jul
nuke9–00.0953%18 Jul
ancient13–30.0425%17 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0320%16 Jul
cache13–110.1218%14 Jul
ancient13–80.0419%12 Jul
ancient13–50.1520%12 Jul
cache7–130.1227%11 Jul
dust29–130.0126%11 Jul
mirage13–30.0345%11 Jul
nuke13–00.0330%9 Jul
ancient13–30.1318%9 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0323%9 Jul
cache13–00.1319%9 Jul
inferno1–9-0.246%5 Jul
overpass8–13-0.0121%15 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0718%9 Jun
ancient13–70.0426%30 May
cache13–100.1327%29 May
ancient16–120.0323%27 May
mirage1–40.0829%26 May
ancient9–13-0.0216%23 May
ancient13–9-0.0517%23 May
anubis14–160.0223%21 May
mirage13–60.1236%21 May
ancient13–70.0521%18 May
mirage19–16-0.0116%9 May
inferno9–20.2319%29 Apr
inferno9–30.1232%29 Apr
inferno9–30.2130%29 Apr
nuke9–10.4225%29 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0711%23 Apr
ancient16–140.0319%22 Apr
mirage12–160.1118%11 Apr
dust210–130.1023%7 Apr
nuke13–10.1353%7 Apr
dust28–13-0.0116%31 Mar
mirage13–70.0126%31 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0721%24 Mar
ancient13–7-0.0224%24 Mar
dust213–10.0920%24 Mar
dust24–130.0330%22 Mar
inferno3–13-0.0420%22 Mar
mirage13–100.0632%18 Mar
ancient13–5-0.0730%17 Mar
ancient3–13-0.0625%15 Mar
mirage13–80.0122%13 Mar
dust213–70.0534%12 Mar
mirage13–60.0831%10 Mar
dust214–160.1127%10 Mar
anubis11–130.1329%9 Mar
dust212–120.0827%4 Mar
mirage11–40.1328%4 Mar
dust213–70.0933%3 Mar
mirage12–120.1523%23 Feb
mirage12–120.0527%22 Feb
vertigo3–11-0.0347%22 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0319%18 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0418%15 Feb
inferno13–6-0.0231%10 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0323%10 Feb
mirage13–11-0.049%30 Jan
mirage3–130.0016%28 Jan
overpass7–13-0.0326%17 Jan
ancient13–40.1236%16 Jan
ancient6–130.0316%15 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0119%12 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0528%9 Jan
ancient5–130.0119%9 Jan
inferno9–130.0717%7 Jan
dust24–13-0.0310%4 Jan
mirage12–12-0.0517%3 Jan
train19–170.0121%2 Jan
ancient10–13-0.0417%24 Dec
ancient16–130.0322%22 Dec
dust29–130.0624%20 Dec
overpass11–13-0.0122%18 Dec
nuke8–130.0927%16 Dec
nuke11–130.0218%15 Dec
ancient13–100.0217%13 Dec
ancient13–160.0315%4 Dec
mirage13–11-0.0426%4 Dec
ancient8–13-0.0721%4 Dec
overpass1–40.0428%4 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →