Truls789

Truls789 — CS2 Stats

NO76561198452476543[U:1:492210815]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

183Tracked matches67%Win rate2022Tracked since
142Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 183 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,546 +3,930 13 Aug – 27 Oct · 12 days played
13,54817,546peak 17,54613 Aug27 Oct
17,546Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,018Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2025-03-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 19 Oct 2026 and 26 Oct 2026.

Measured 19 Oct 2026 → 26 Oct 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate44.1%42.7%43.8%meets
Shot accuracy8.2%11.2%12.0%3.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.790.991.020.23 short
Match win rate46.9%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTruls789FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,018csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning47
Utility23

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateWLLWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −9.5pp headshot accuracy · −59ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 668ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility2.3
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 664ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.7
Utility2.3
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time673ms+28ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 673ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 6 Aug →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · agency, 18 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 2–6 · train, 13 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 23 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 12mirageWeakest map · 39% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC239–1439%-0.01
nukeA1811–761%0.00
overpassB147–750%-0.01
infernoS128–467%0.01
vertigoA85–363%-0.01
ancientA74–357%0.00
dust2A74–357%-0.01
anubisB63–350%0.01
train—32–167%0.01
agency—20–20%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 23). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

5,366Lifetime kills
0.79K/D
431Matches
46.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
44.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
8.2%Shot accuracy
895MVPs
142Hours (in match)
349Bombs planted
93Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

544inferno
409nuke
220dust2
205vertigo
159train
14lake
9cbble
9safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

20Matches
50%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
79.5ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
38%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage367%1.6121.0
Ancient250%0.7211.0
Dust220%0.8413.5
Train1100%1.3316.0
Inferno10%0.6111.0
Vertigo10%1.1033.0
Overpass10%0.7512.0
Nuke1100%1.3013.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.1%Spray accuracy
76.2%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
664msReaction time
29.5%T opening success
33.8%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
1.1%Flash assists
9.10HE damage / grenade
5.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.5039% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–40.0713%24 May →
ancient14–16-0.0317%30 Jan →
inferno4–9-0.0719%9 Nov →
overpass13–11-0.0513%27 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.0915%27 Oct →
inferno13–80.0221%27 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0610%27 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0110%16 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.038%15 Oct →
nuke13–1-0.010%15 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0712%15 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0116%15 Oct →
nuke13–100.0325%5 Oct →
nuke13–50.0335%5 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0211%4 Oct →
dust28–130.0136%4 Oct →
inferno4–9-0.1830%3 Oct →
overpass7–9-0.0320%30 Sept →
nuke9–7-0.0121%30 Sept →
inferno9–10.0614%30 Sept →
vertigo0–9-0.3013%30 Sept →
mirage13–100.0117%24 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0213%22 Sept →
ancient13–20.018%22 Sept →
mirage5–130.0134%22 Sept →
nuke1–50.0313%21 Sept →
train13–70.1225%21 Sept →
nuke5–130.0919%21 Sept →
anubis13–100.0126%17 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0122%2 Sept →
vertigo13–70.0415%2 Sept →
overpass13–10-0.0217%2 Sept →
dust213–50.0529%1 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0220%1 Sept →
nuke13–100.0217%26 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.038%26 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0119%26 Aug →
mirage7–130.0121%26 Aug →
agency4–13-0.0856%18 Aug →
overpass13–6-0.0222%18 Aug →
mirage13–60.1210%15 Aug →
ancient7–130.0215%15 Aug →
overpass9–40.1328%15 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0024%15 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0317%15 Aug →
overpass7–130.0411%14 Aug →
inferno13–90.0110%14 Aug →
overpass13–90.0110%13 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0211%13 Aug →
overpass12–8-0.0611%13 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.1010%13 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0212%13 Aug →
overpass13–100.077%13 Aug →
train2–6-0.040%13 Aug →
anubis13–30.0510%13 Aug →
mirage13–70.0218%12 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0317%12 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0411%12 Aug →
dust24–13-0.037%12 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0424%12 Aug →
nuke13–40.0712%12 Aug →
dust28–13-0.1012%11 Aug →
overpass4–13-0.0618%11 Aug →
anubis12–12-0.019%11 Aug →
agency12–120.0311%11 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0121%11 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.038%11 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0121%11 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.069%11 Aug →
mirage16–120.0615%11 Aug →
dust213–50.0214%9 Aug →
vertigo13–50.0226%9 Aug →
anubis13–110.0413%7 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0320%7 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.0633%7 Aug →
mirage10–130.0918%6 Aug →
ancient11–00.0313%6 Aug →
inferno9–20.2816%6 Aug →
ancient13–70.018%26 Jul →
overpass8–13-0.0616%26 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0320%26 Jul →
nuke13–30.0315%26 Jul →
mirage13–70.0133%26 Jul →
mirage11–130.0118%25 Jul →
vertigo13–80.0424%23 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0621%23 Jul →
overpass3–13-0.0217%23 Jul →
overpass0–5-0.0425%23 Jul →
vertigo13–11-0.0010%23 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0216%23 Jul →
inferno13–00.0833%23 Jul →
mirage12–12-0.0318%23 Jul →
vertigo8–8-0.0218%23 Jul →
vertigo5–90.0326%20 Jul →
vertigo13–110.1414%20 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0314%13 May →
train13–4-0.0615%13 May →
overpass11–13-0.0323%5 Mar →
nuke13–50.0228%5 Mar →
anubis10–13-0.0218%5 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.