๓ ณ โง๐™จ๐™ž๐™ค

๓ ณ โง๐™จ๐™ž๐™ค โ€” CS2 Stats

76561198451089625[U:1:490823897]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

417Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,752Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,579Purple band ยท top ~22.1% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 28 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking โ†’

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,579 +3,628 2 Jul โ€“ 17 Sept ยท 11 days played
12,95116,579peak 16,5792 Jul17 Sept
16,579Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-06-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak โ€” 16,579
  • +3,628 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 โ€” 3,421 to go
  • Reached: Purple band ยท Blue band ยท Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate40.6%44.3%46.9%6.3% short
Shot accuracy14.5%11.8%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.941.031.080.14 short
Match win rate47.5%45.2%46.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๓ ณ โง๐™จ๐™ž๐™คPREMIER16,579 ยท Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning65
Utility43

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49โ€“44โ€“7Last 10049%Win rateLWWWWWLTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate ยท โˆ’0.04 avg rating ยท +5.0pp headshot accuracy ยท โˆ’42ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” within the normal variation of a 10-match window (ยฑ20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4โ€“1 ยท 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 5โ€“4โ€“1 ยท 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Last 20

  • 10โ€“9โ€“1 ยท 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player โ€” Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility4.3
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch2.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 โ€” the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success โ€” winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game โ€” the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 39% on T โ€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning6.5
Utility4.3
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first โ…“ avg 0.02 โ†’ last โ…“ avg 0.03
Reaction time581msโˆ’78ms
first โ…“ avg 659ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy30.2%+3.3%
first โ…“ avg 26.9% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 30.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating ยท 9โ€“4 ยท inferno, 16 Sept โ†’
67%Best headshot accuracy ยท 0โ€“6 ยท office, 22 Jul โ†’
438msFastest reaction time ยท 5โ€“13 ยท office, 9 Sept โ†’
13โ€“0Biggest win ยท vertigo, 15 Sept โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
9โ€“6In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map ยท 67% over 15officeWeakest map ยท 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA1710โ€“759%0.02
nukeS1510โ€“567%0.03
cacheC125โ€“742%0.02
vertigoC114โ€“736%0.02
dust2A117โ€“464%0.04
officeD93โ€“633%0.00
infernoB84โ€“450%0.04
ancientC52โ€“340%0.01
anubisโ€”42โ€“250%-0.00
trainโ€”42โ€“250%0.03
overpassโ€”10โ€“10%-0.02
italyโ€”10โ€“10%-0.06
shelterโ€”10โ€“10%0.01
boulderโ€”10โ€“10%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

122,760Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
4,772Matches
47.5%Match win rate ยท Top 50% of Purple band
40.6%Headshot %
14.5%Shot accuracy ยท Top 50% of Purple band
12,003MVPs
1,752Hours (in match)
3,337Bombs planted
1,085Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,333
SSG 0810,030
AWP7,517
Negev4,553
SG 5532,222
Molotov1,841

Lifetime map wins

5,253inferno
4,117dust2
1,384nuke
1,003office
836vertigo
731cbble
695train
562lake

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

38Matches
39%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
79.3ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2040%1.2616.5
Dust2743%1.1117.9
Inferno40%1.1919.0
Ancient333%1.0114.7
Anubis2100%2.2821.5
Nuke1100%0.7911.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.4%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.3%Spray accuracy
89.0%Counter-strafing
7.7ยฐPreaim
591msReaction time
38.7%T opening success
62.5%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
7.58HE damage / grenade
7.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.6508% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy โ†’Vertigo grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient7โ€“13-0.0125%22 Sept โ†’
nuke16โ€“130.0129%17 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“5-0.0321%17 Sept โ†’
office13โ€“110.0132%16 Sept โ†’
office13โ€“50.0153%16 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“10.0625%16 Sept โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0432%16 Sept โ†’
vertigo8โ€“80.0830%16 Sept โ†’
nuke5โ€“90.0032%16 Sept โ†’
overpass4โ€“9-0.0238%16 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“40.2125%16 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“100.0321%16 Sept โ†’
anubis8โ€“130.0028%16 Sept โ†’
nuke8โ€“130.0632%15 Sept โ†’
nuke1โ€“13-0.0914%15 Sept โ†’
vertigo13โ€“00.1532%15 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0118%15 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“90.0728%15 Sept โ†’
nuke14โ€“160.0321%14 Sept โ†’
dust27โ€“130.0647%14 Sept โ†’
vertigo4โ€“130.0252%14 Sept โ†’
anubis2โ€“13-0.0429%14 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“30.0328%14 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“100.0743%13 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“8-0.0114%13 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“11-0.0326%12 Sept โ†’
vertigo13โ€“70.1123%12 Sept โ†’
dust25โ€“130.1031%12 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“110.0130%11 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0729%11 Sept โ†’
cache6โ€“130.0434%11 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“90.1227%11 Sept โ†’
inferno6โ€“90.0647%11 Sept โ†’
vertigo4โ€“9-0.1145%11 Sept โ†’
cache13โ€“100.0935%11 Sept โ†’
inferno8โ€“130.0023%10 Sept โ†’
cache12โ€“12-0.0132%10 Sept โ†’
train13โ€“80.0636%10 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“40.0328%10 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“00.0324%10 Sept โ†’
vertigo7โ€“13-0.0622%10 Sept โ†’
vertigo9โ€“7-0.0756%10 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“100.1527%10 Sept โ†’
ancient11โ€“13-0.0433%9 Sept โ†’
office5โ€“13-0.0130%9 Sept โ†’
vertigo4โ€“13-0.0131%9 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“50.0434%7 Sept โ†’
office12โ€“120.0236%7 Sept โ†’
office13โ€“110.0327%7 Sept โ†’
vertigo9โ€“60.0250%31 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“60.0240%31 Aug โ†’
italy5โ€“13-0.0624%30 Aug โ†’
mirage4โ€“13-0.0427%28 Aug โ†’
inferno10โ€“130.0529%27 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0041%26 Aug โ†’
cache12โ€“12-0.0144%26 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“3-0.0624%26 Aug โ†’
nuke9โ€“7-0.0125%19 Aug โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.0325%19 Aug โ†’
cache12โ€“12-0.0742%18 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“90.0725%18 Aug โ†’
train13โ€“80.0642%18 Aug โ†’
train2โ€“13-0.0428%13 Aug โ†’
train8โ€“130.0330%13 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“4-0.0150%13 Aug โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0417%10 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“60.0417%10 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“40.0423%8 Aug โ†’
inferno3โ€“9-0.100%6 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“40.1522%6 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“30.0924%5 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“90.0631%5 Aug โ†’
nuke16โ€“120.0426%4 Aug โ†’
dust216โ€“120.0735%3 Aug โ†’
nuke10โ€“7-0.0326%3 Aug โ†’
vertigo8โ€“130.0428%31 Jul โ†’
vertigo5โ€“13-0.0135%29 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“50.0024%27 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“50.0041%24 Jul โ†’
office0โ€“6-0.0567%22 Jul โ†’
mirage6โ€“13-0.0321%22 Jul โ†’
dust211โ€“13-0.0143%22 Jul โ†’
mirage6โ€“120.0530%21 Jul โ†’
nuke8โ€“130.0619%20 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“30.0145%19 Jul โ†’
cache10โ€“130.0413%19 Jul โ†’
cache10โ€“130.0436%19 Jul โ†’
shelter10โ€“130.0122%17 Jul โ†’
boulder8โ€“130.0227%17 Jul โ†’
office8โ€“130.0632%14 Jul โ†’
cache14โ€“160.0534%14 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“70.0529%14 Jul โ†’
office11โ€“13-0.0127%14 Jul โ†’
mirage9โ€“130.0534%13 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“11-0.0526%5 Jul โ†’
dust212โ€“120.0518%5 Jul โ†’
dust22โ€“00.050%5 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“40.078%4 Jul โ†’
ancient15โ€“150.0316%2 Jul โ†’
office11โ€“13-0.0324%28 Jun โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’