Termis2

Termis2 — CS2 Stats

FI76561198449509584[U:1:489243856]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,072Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,475Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.4 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,497 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 15 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,595 +498 6 Jan7 Jan · 2 days played
16,09716,595peak 16,5956 Jan7 Jan
16,595Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,497Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2025-12-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,497
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 34 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-18
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,302), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate42.1%45.7%46.8%4.7% short
Shot accuracy16.1%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.871.051.060.19 short
Match win rate40.4%45.7%46.3%5.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTermis2FACEITLevel 7 · 1,497 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,497csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning30
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46522Last 10046%Win rateLLLLWTWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −6.4pp headshot accuracy · −58ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 637ms

Last 20

  • 6131 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 666ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim4.5
Utility5.1
Positioning3.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 738ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning3.0
Utility5.1
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time703ms+34ms
first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 703ms
Headshot accuracy22.7%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 5–13 · inferno, 9 Jan
83%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · mirage, 13 Apr
398msFastest reaction time · 5–9 · vertigo, 25 Aug
13–2Biggest win · train, 6 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L4Current streak
148In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 91% over 11dust2Weakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA169756%-0.03
mirageC1661038%-0.04
dust2D1441029%-0.02
anubisB115645%-0.04
ancientS1110191%-0.01
cacheD103730%-0.04
infernoS64267%-0.00
trainB63350%-0.04
overpass42250%-0.03
vertigo1010%-0.14
debris1010%-0.06
fachwerk1010%-0.00
alpine1010%-0.04
stronghold1010%-0.07
golden1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

147,845Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
6,160Matches
40.4%Match win rate
42.1%Headshot %
16.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 7 players
15,407MVPs
3,475Hours (in match)
5,232Bombs planted
2,065Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4742,962
AWP40,643
Knife2,678
SSG 082,402
P2501,933
SG 5531,778

Lifetime map wins

7,151dust2
6,682inferno
5,799nuke
4,676train
2,548vertigo
755cbble
314office
86lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,672Matches
50%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
66.8ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis17656%0.9715.3
Nuke17359%0.9514.5
Ancient16754%0.9313.7
Mirage11238%0.8113.2
Inferno6340%0.8713.9
Dust26237%0.8112.7
Train4048%0.8913.2
Vertigo3941%0.8914.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.7%Headshot accuracy
28.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
80.8%Counter-strafing
11.8°Preaim
738msReaction time
20.9%T opening success
28.9%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
11.39HE damage / grenade
10.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 737.6441ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.8798% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno2–9-0.0711%29 Aug
cache10–13-0.0222%29 Aug
vertigo5–9-0.1427%25 Aug
nuke7–90.0023%25 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0814%25 Aug
debris8–8-0.0610%15 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0725%5 Aug
dust24–13-0.0714%5 Aug
nuke0–13-0.150%5 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0412%26 Jul
cache10–13-0.0517%25 Jul
cache16–13-0.0113%18 Jul
cache8–13-0.0223%18 Jul
dust28–13-0.0915%17 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0329%17 Jul
fachwerk9–13-0.0029%13 Jul
cache2–13-0.0629%13 Jul
cache3–13-0.049%28 Jun
cache5–13-0.0725%2 May
cache13–5-0.0532%2 May
cache13–11-0.0729%1 May
cache10–13-0.0535%29 Apr
inferno13–70.0623%14 Apr
dust26–130.0213%13 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0383%13 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0221%13 Feb
overpass6–13-0.0538%12 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0850%11 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0513%11 Feb
dust27–13-0.016%11 Feb
mirage14–16-0.1112%11 Feb
alpine12–8-0.0428%6 Feb
stronghold10–13-0.0720%6 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0722%4 Feb
dust211–13-0.0732%4 Feb
anubis15–15-0.0130%4 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0918%4 Feb
ancient13–10-0.0614%4 Feb
anubis13–80.0044%3 Feb
dust25–130.0138%3 Feb
nuke6–130.0123%2 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0614%31 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0513%31 Jan
dust216–120.0419%30 Jan
overpass12–16-0.0319%29 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0125%29 Jan
anubis10–13-0.0920%28 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0216%26 Jan
nuke13–5-0.0124%26 Jan
mirage13–6-0.0020%26 Jan
ancient13–10-0.029%26 Jan
dust213–50.0014%26 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0611%25 Jan
nuke13–70.0414%24 Jan
anubis6–13-0.0219%24 Jan
ancient16–140.0125%24 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0117%22 Jan
mirage13–5-0.0433%22 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0925%22 Jan
nuke14–16-0.0613%22 Jan
anubis6–13-0.0430%22 Jan
anubis14–16-0.0222%21 Jan
mirage16–130.0418%20 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0316%18 Jan
nuke1–13-0.0529%18 Jan
anubis5–13-0.085%18 Jan
dust213–11-0.0320%15 Jan
nuke4–13-0.0336%14 Jan
dust28–13-0.0315%11 Jan
train8–13-0.076%11 Jan
anubis13–6-0.0116%9 Jan
golden3–130.0133%9 Jan
inferno5–130.0811%9 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0723%7 Jan
ancient13–110.0226%6 Jan
train13–2-0.0443%6 Jan
ancient13–90.0215%20 Dec
mirage14–160.0234%20 Dec
train12–160.0118%19 Dec
ancient13–20.0736%19 Dec
nuke8–13-0.0026%18 Dec
dust28–130.0232%18 Dec
train8–13-0.0314%18 Dec
train13–9-0.0528%18 Dec
inferno13–80.0126%18 Dec
dust29–13-0.0315%17 Dec
ancient13–50.0230%17 Dec
train13–4-0.0312%17 Dec
inferno13–11-0.0222%17 Dec
ancient14–16-0.0510%17 Dec
nuke13–90.0124%17 Dec
nuke13–6-0.0236%16 Dec
overpass13–10-0.0212%16 Dec
mirage16–13-0.0413%16 Dec
nuke13–50.0237%16 Dec
overpass13–11-0.0315%16 Dec
dust213–110.017%16 Dec
dust26–13-0.0712%15 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0321%15 Dec
ancient13–11-0.0515%15 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →