Semi | Reagandae

Semi | Reagandae — CS2 Stats

76561198443034074[U:1:482768346]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,843Tracked matches52%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,021Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,018Top 50% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#94002 of 247902 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,126 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,843 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,018 -378 20 Jul – 15 Sept · 29 days played
18,64220,119peak 20,11920 Jul15 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,126 +0 30 Aug – 15 Sept · 3 observations
1,1261,126peak 1,12630 Aug15 Sept
20,351Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,126Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-07-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,126
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 75 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,101 below peak (20,119)
  • -875 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 982 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches24——
Win rate42%——
K/D0.83——
Headshot %51%——

Measured 1 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,870), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate52.1%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy2.3%12.7%13.0%10.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.931.051.060.14 short
Match win rate50.1%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSemi | ReagandaeFACEITLevel 7 · 1,126 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER19,018 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,126csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning54
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–42–8Last 10050%Win rateLLWWTTWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · −117ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Last 10

  • 4–4–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 20

  • 9–7–4 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility6.4
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.4
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact5.7

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time589ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 12 Aug →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · mirage, 12 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 13 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 8 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
9–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 73% over 11ancientWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2913–1645%-0.02
mirageC167–944%-0.01
cacheS1611–569%0.00
nukeB137–654%-0.02
dust2S118–373%-0.01
ancientD82–625%-0.03
anubisD72–529%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

41,757Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
2,476Matches
50.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
52.1%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
2.3%Shot accuracy
5,211MVPs
1,021Hours (in match)
1,980Bombs planted
558Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,987
AWP2,922
MP9949
Knife619

Lifetime map wins

3,259dust2
2,758nuke
2,619inferno
2,207vertigo
372train
315office
82cbble
8italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

325Matches
49%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
78.5ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6341%1.0216.5
Anubis6144%0.9115.6
Inferno4151%0.8613.3
Vertigo4161%1.1215.6
Ancient3453%0.8112.5
Nuke2343%1.0315.6
Dust22352%0.9013.7
Overpass1844%0.7511.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.3%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
594msReaction time
36.2%T opening success
45.0%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
12.9%Flash assists
12.42HE damage / grenade
5.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.1572% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–13-0.0615%13 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0819%13 Sept →
nuke13–110.0215%12 Sept →
nuke9–50.0729%10 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0110%6 Sept →
inferno12–120.0520%5 Sept →
dust213–70.0229%5 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0515%3 Sept →
inferno13–50.0610%3 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0838%30 Aug →
cache12–120.0225%30 Aug →
cache15–150.0225%29 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0319%29 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0422%29 Aug →
cache4–13-0.099%25 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0013%25 Aug →
cache13–50.0728%24 Aug →
inferno13–40.0118%24 Aug →
nuke16–130.0226%23 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0411%22 Aug →
mirage13–110.0121%22 Aug →
ancient14–160.0116%22 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0327%22 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0924%21 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0624%21 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0230%19 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0328%19 Aug →
cache16–130.0110%16 Aug →
nuke12–12-0.0320%16 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0630%15 Aug →
mirage10–130.0326%15 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0144%15 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0519%15 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0421%15 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0029%15 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.055%15 Aug →
cache13–70.0620%15 Aug →
dust213–110.0114%15 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.0328%14 Aug →
inferno9–130.0125%14 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0722%13 Aug →
mirage6–130.0121%13 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0227%13 Aug →
mirage13–30.0846%12 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0124%12 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0416%12 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.039%12 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0218%12 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0510%11 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0223%11 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.038%11 Aug →
nuke13–80.0625%11 Aug →
nuke13–70.0217%10 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0432%10 Aug →
mirage13–3-0.0419%10 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0116%10 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0620%9 Aug →
nuke15–15-0.0819%9 Aug →
mirage9–2-0.0230%9 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0517%8 Aug →
mirage13–40.0110%8 Aug →
dust213–80.0531%8 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0321%8 Aug →
inferno2–0-0.040%8 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0024%8 Aug →
mirage10–130.0035%8 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0313%8 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0416%8 Aug →
inferno13–00.0227%8 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.059%5 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0326%5 Aug →
cache13–110.0225%5 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0511%2 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0118%2 Aug →
anubis13–60.0113%29 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0314%29 Jul →
nuke15–15-0.065%29 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0917%27 Jul →
cache13–40.0326%27 Jul →
dust213–160.0126%26 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0624%26 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0329%26 Jul →
inferno10–130.0234%26 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.0715%26 Jul →
nuke16–14-0.0622%26 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0312%25 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0222%25 Jul →
cache13–60.0419%25 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0417%25 Jul →
inferno13–100.0328%25 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0515%25 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0524%22 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0332%22 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0234%22 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0527%22 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0618%21 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0211%21 Jul →
cache13–110.0532%21 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0231%20 Jul →
anubis13–7-0.006%20 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.