Edgren1233

Edgren1233 — CS2 Stats

SE76561198442737050[U:1:482471322]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

904Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,453Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.2 LearningPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,070 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,070 → 1,070
+12Tracked matches · now 904
−12.2ppWin rate · 58.6% → 46.4%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 25 days played since 4 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,290 -225 18 Apr19 Apr · 2 days played
13,29013,515peak 13,51518 Apr19 Apr
Faceit ELO: 1,070 +0 29 Aug3 Sept · 2 observations
1,0701,070peak 1,07029 Aug3 Sept
13,642Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,070Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-04-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,070
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 131 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches39−6
Win rate33%33%0pp
K/D0.641.11−0.47
Headshot %41%48%−7pp

Measured 8 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 8 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate40.2%43.8%44.9%4.7% short
Shot accuracy14.5%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.001.021.040.04 short
Match win rate43.5%44.7%45.3%1.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEdgren1233FACEITLevel 5 · 1,070 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,070csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49
Positioning44
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41545Last 10041%Win rateLLWLLLLTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.6pp headshot accuracy · +60ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Last 20

  • 7112 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim4.9
Utility3.7
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 55% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9
Positioning4.4
Utility3.7
Mechanics1.2
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact3.8

Composite 3.2/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time573ms−95ms
first ⅓ avg 669ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 13.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–8 · mirage, 20 Aug
29%Best headshot accuracy · 6–1 · dust2, 17 Apr
422msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · cache, 1 Sept
13–0Biggest win · office, 4 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
73In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 70% over 10infernoWeakest map · 0% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB158753%-0.02
cacheC146843%-0.02
vertigoC114736%-0.01
dust2S107370%-0.01
infernoD8080%-0.00
ancientD82625%-0.03
nukeB63350%-0.00
overpassD61517%-0.02
trainB63350%-0.01
office42250%-0.04
fachwerk32167%0.02
italy31233%0.03
anubis32167%-0.05
boulder1010%-0.02
shelter1010%0.06
warden1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

64,299Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
3,701Matches
43.5%Match win rate
40.2%Headshot %
14.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
7,026MVPs
1,191Hours (in match)
1,438Bombs planted
587Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,159inferno
2,998dust2
2,583vertigo
1,392nuke
1,090office
849train
538lake
114cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

177Matches
53%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
68.7ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5347%0.8313.0
Dust23040%0.7912.5
Ancient2556%0.8612.3
Vertigo1974%1.0315.4
Anubis1443%0.6110.0
Train1275%1.1915.3
Nuke1050%0.8414.3
Inferno850%0.7814.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.9%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
55.5%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
582msReaction time
30.1%T opening success
34.5%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
7.17HE damage / grenade
6.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.8716% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4723 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.12% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–13-0.0213%8 Sept
fachwerk4–13-0.0511%8 Sept
office13–10-0.049%8 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0322%6 Sept
vertigo1–13-0.0422%4 Sept
vertigo9–130.0315%4 Sept
boulder3–13-0.0214%4 Sept
inferno12–120.0617%4 Sept
italy13–110.0413%4 Sept
office13–0-0.0116%4 Sept
cache2–00.000%4 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0714%4 Sept
cache13–11-0.0417%1 Sept
anubis13–9-0.076%1 Sept
vertigo4–9-0.0526%1 Sept
fachwerk13–00.076%31 Aug
vertigo3–13-0.0510%31 Aug
italy7–130.0617%31 Aug
cache12–12-0.0218%31 Aug
ancient4–130.0110%24 Aug
dust29–13-0.0519%24 Aug
nuke11–130.0615%24 Aug
dust213–8-0.0015%24 Aug
mirage13–80.048%24 Aug
cache5–13-0.0122%24 Aug
vertigo8–13-0.0218%24 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0615%24 Aug
ancient13–40.0217%24 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0113%21 Aug
dust213–8-0.0217%21 Aug
cache13–6-0.0523%21 Aug
vertigo13–11-0.0718%21 Aug
mirage13–70.0324%21 Aug
cache13–4-0.0715%21 Aug
vertigo13–90.0614%21 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0612%21 Aug
cache6–13-0.0415%21 Aug
mirage13–80.0913%20 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0613%20 Aug
cache13–2-0.0122%20 Aug
dust21–13-0.0421%20 Aug
mirage13–1-0.080%20 Aug
inferno1–130.0320%20 Aug
overpass12–12-0.0023%20 Aug
overpass9–13-0.0213%20 Aug
mirage7–130.0314%19 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0113%19 Aug
cache4–130.0219%17 Aug
inferno4–130.0822%17 Aug
vertigo13–70.0317%14 Aug
train4–1-0.020%14 Aug
nuke13–9-0.058%14 Aug
fachwerk13–60.0315%14 Aug
shelter9–130.0617%14 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0710%13 Aug
cache2–13-0.0410%13 Aug
train13–90.049%13 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0211%13 Aug
cache13–110.058%13 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0313%13 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0320%12 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0517%12 Aug
overpass13–60.0619%12 Aug
dust23–130.0815%12 Aug
train1–13-0.068%12 Aug
dust213–40.0018%11 Aug
vertigo9–130.0619%11 Aug
cache5–13-0.0613%11 Aug
overpass3–8-0.066%8 Aug
train8–130.018%31 Jul
italy1–13-0.0229%31 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0116%22 Jul
overpass7–13-0.1021%22 Jul
cache6–13-0.0215%22 Jul
nuke13–80.0115%18 Jun
dust213–8-0.0115%18 Jun
office1–13-0.057%18 Jun
train12–12-0.0213%18 Jun
mirage12–12-0.085%18 Jun
mirage13–16-0.047%4 Jun
vertigo13–6-0.0315%4 Jun
cache11–13-0.0010%30 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0618%26 Apr
nuke13–10.0218%26 Apr
vertigo7–13-0.0510%19 Apr
overpass6–13-0.0213%19 Apr
mirage13–90.0014%19 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0812%19 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0418%19 Apr
warden2–130.0123%18 Apr
train13–110.0020%18 Apr
inferno5–13-0.079%18 Apr
ancient7–60.047%18 Apr
dust213–60.0421%17 Apr
dust213–9-0.0610%17 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0510%17 Apr
inferno5–13-0.027%17 Apr
office0–9-0.0513%17 Apr
dust26–1-0.0029%17 Apr
inferno6–130.0110%4 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →