๐•ทรฉnaโ™›

๐•ทรฉnaโ™› โ€” CS2 Stats

MV76561198440228263[U:1:479962535]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

1,505Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,661Top 10% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band ยท top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16406 of 261619 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 ยท 1,421 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Nov 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,661 +661 25 Aug โ€“ 6 Nov ยท 19 days played
24,98926,677peak 26,67725 Aug6 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,421 +0 19 Sept โ€“ 29 Oct ยท 4 observations
1,4211,421peak 1,42119 Sept29 Oct
26,677Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,421Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-08-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak โ€” 1,421
  • 0 over 30 days ยท steady
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 โ€” 110 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 ยท Level 6 ยท Level 5 ยท Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-19
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,016 below peak (26,677)
  • -580 over 30 days ยท declining
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 โ€” 4,339 to go
  • Reached: Red band ยท Pink band ยท Purple band ยท Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-19
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-19

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDBโ€™s own observation โ€” no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐•ทรฉnaโ™›FACEITLevel 9 ยท 1,421 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,661 ยท Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,421csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning56
Utility25

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50โ€“44โ€“6Last 10050%Win rateLLLLWTLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: โˆ’50pp win rate ยท โˆ’0.03 avg rating ยท โˆ’1.2pp headshot accuracy ยท โˆ’1ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” more than a 10-match window's normal noise (ยฑ20pp).

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1โ€“4 ยท 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 2โ€“7โ€“1 ยท 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 20

  • 9โ€“10โ€“1 ยท 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player โ€” Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility2.5
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 โ€” the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points โ€” deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game โ€” the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.6
Utility2.5
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first โ…“ avg 0.03 โ†’ last โ…“ avg 0.03
Reaction time515ms+2ms
first โ…“ avg 513ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 515ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%+1.2%
first โ…“ avg 17.6% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.30Best match rating ยท 9โ€“3 ยท inferno, 3 Oct โ†’
38%Best headshot accuracy ยท 3โ€“9 ยท inferno, 18 Sept โ†’
320msFastest reaction time ยท 13โ€“4 ยท inferno, 2 Sept โ†’
13โ€“2Biggest win ยท dust2, 30 Oct โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
6โ€“8In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map ยท 67% over 6mirageWeakest map ยท 32% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA4325โ€“1858%0.06
mirageD196โ€“1332%0.04
dust2A138โ€“562%0.02
ancientC114โ€“736%0.01
anubisS64โ€“267%0.03
officeโ€”31โ€“233%0.04
nukeโ€”21โ€“150%0.00
cacheโ€”20โ€“20%-0.04
trainโ€”11โ€“0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 19). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

593Matches
52%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
81.7ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust217054%1.2216.6
Mirage10847%1.1516.4
Inferno9863%1.3117.7
Ancient9648%1.1916.4
Anubis5756%1.1416.8
Nuke2548%1.1716.3
Cache1638%1.0115.6
Overpass850%1.1620.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
43.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.4%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
9.5ยฐPreaim
520msReaction time
40.0%T opening success
49.1%CT opening success
0.31Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
9.38HE damage / grenade
1.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.313 โ€” below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups โ†’
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.9837% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 19 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy โ†’Mirage grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9โ€“130.0416%13 Nov โ†’
mirage4โ€“130.0110%11 Nov โ†’
inferno4โ€“90.0613%10 Nov โ†’
office4โ€“13-0.0120%10 Nov โ†’
office13โ€“80.0514%10 Nov โ†’
inferno8โ€“80.0017%7 Nov โ†’
inferno7โ€“13-0.019%7 Nov โ†’
inferno14โ€“160.0019%7 Nov โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0719%6 Nov โ†’
anubis1โ€“13-0.0510%6 Nov โ†’
inferno13โ€“9-0.0520%5 Nov โ†’
inferno3โ€“9-0.0620%2 Nov โ†’
dust216โ€“130.0612%30 Oct โ†’
dust213โ€“20.1618%30 Oct โ†’
inferno9โ€“60.1810%29 Oct โ†’
ancient13โ€“60.0516%29 Oct โ†’
anubis13โ€“60.1714%29 Oct โ†’
ancient14โ€“16-0.0115%29 Oct โ†’
ancient10โ€“13-0.0619%28 Oct โ†’
inferno13โ€“60.0416%28 Oct โ†’
anubis13โ€“110.0112%27 Oct โ†’
ancient7โ€“130.0211%26 Oct โ†’
dust213โ€“80.0328%26 Oct โ†’
ancient8โ€“13-0.0425%24 Oct โ†’
mirage5โ€“13-0.0233%22 Oct โ†’
dust213โ€“80.0635%22 Oct โ†’
mirage4โ€“130.0421%22 Oct โ†’
train13โ€“80.0126%22 Oct โ†’
mirage1โ€“13-0.0115%22 Oct โ†’
inferno7โ€“90.1718%21 Oct โ†’
inferno5โ€“90.1034%19 Oct โ†’
inferno13โ€“100.0530%19 Oct โ†’
mirage13โ€“40.1126%19 Oct โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.0226%19 Oct โ†’
inferno9โ€“20.2234%15 Oct โ†’
dust213โ€“80.0829%11 Oct โ†’
mirage13โ€“30.1329%10 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“60.0217%10 Oct โ†’
inferno9โ€“70.0819%9 Oct โ†’
inferno8โ€“80.0031%9 Oct โ†’
inferno8โ€“8-0.0215%7 Oct โ†’
mirage9โ€“130.0622%7 Oct โ†’
inferno8โ€“80.0910%7 Oct โ†’
inferno13โ€“80.0425%6 Oct โ†’
ancient11โ€“130.1519%5 Oct โ†’
cache8โ€“13-0.0218%5 Oct โ†’
inferno16โ€“130.0016%4 Oct โ†’
anubis19โ€“150.0310%4 Oct โ†’
inferno9โ€“30.3020%3 Oct โ†’
inferno4โ€“13-0.0123%3 Oct โ†’
mirage4โ€“130.1122%3 Oct โ†’
inferno9โ€“70.0615%3 Oct โ†’
cache5โ€“13-0.0624%1 Oct โ†’
mirage13โ€“70.0421%1 Oct โ†’
dust28โ€“130.0118%27 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0329%26 Sept โ†’
ancient14โ€“16-0.039%25 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“50.0219%23 Sept โ†’
inferno8โ€“130.0423%23 Sept โ†’
mirage12โ€“120.0226%23 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“30.0617%20 Sept โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0021%20 Sept โ†’
ancient9โ€“13-0.0419%20 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“90.0612%18 Sept โ†’
office5โ€“130.0812%18 Sept โ†’
inferno3โ€“90.0238%18 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“13-0.0116%16 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“40.0620%16 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“70.119%16 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“60.1422%16 Sept โ†’
mirage10โ€“130.0416%15 Sept โ†’
dust23โ€“6-0.076%14 Sept โ†’
mirage11โ€“130.1323%12 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“100.0917%9 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“90.1117%8 Sept โ†’
dust24โ€“13-0.0826%7 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“9-0.0329%7 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“11-0.0016%7 Sept โ†’
dust211โ€“13-0.0024%5 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“6-0.0318%4 Sept โ†’
inferno8โ€“80.0519%4 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“2-0.000%3 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“90.0330%3 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“8-0.0022%2 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“40.0310%2 Sept โ†’
inferno4โ€“9-0.0215%1 Sept โ†’
inferno2โ€“9-0.1920%1 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“20.1723%1 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“10.2224%1 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“8-0.0116%1 Sept โ†’
dust22โ€“130.0120%1 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“40.1119%31 Aug โ†’
mirage11โ€“130.0326%25 Aug โ†’
inferno9โ€“50.1616%25 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“40.0313%24 Aug โ†’
ancient16โ€“13-0.048%24 Aug โ†’
inferno2โ€“9-0.077%23 Aug โ†’
inferno9โ€“50.0712%23 Aug โ†’
inferno6โ€“90.0623%23 Aug โ†’
anubis9โ€“130.0215%23 Aug โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.