ButtButter

ButtButter — CS2 Stats

76561198433515695[U:1:473249967]Steam profile ↗

461Tracked matches60%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,480Pink band · top ~8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4234 of 9857 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

20,121Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,480
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,520 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGButtButterFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER20,480 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning46
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51472Last 10051%Win rateWWLLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5
Aggression3.8
Utility5.9
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.6
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels0.2
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time552ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 568ms → last ⅓ avg 552ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 15.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — ancient 9–0
130Biggest win — cache
8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 72% over 18infernoWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C36162044%0.00
cacheB20101050%0.00
ancientS1813572%-0.01
infernoD93633%0.02
anubisA85363%0.01
nukeB63350%-0.01
mirage31233%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

15Matches
53%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
78.7ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
36%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2475%1.1822.0
Nuke425%0.9819.0
Mirage333%1.1414.0
Anubis1100%1.4413.0
Ancient1100%0.699.0
Inferno10%0.5811.0
Cache1100%1.5012.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
72.3%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
542msReaction time
31.4%T opening success
29.9%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
9.74HE damage / grenade
9.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.4416% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–110.008%28 Aug
ancient13–70.0917%28 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0312%28 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0516%28 Aug
cache6–13-0.079%28 Aug
cache11–130.0326%27 Aug
dust213–110.0317%27 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0613%27 Aug
cache13–50.0125%27 Aug
dust216–14-0.0219%27 Aug
cache3–13-0.0329%27 Aug
cache3–130.0523%27 Aug
mirage13–80.0111%26 Aug
dust28–13-0.0216%26 Aug
dust213–6-0.0128%26 Aug
inferno10–130.0020%25 Aug
dust210–130.0721%25 Aug
dust211–13-0.0113%23 Aug
dust213–6-0.009%23 Aug
cache13–70.0511%23 Aug
nuke13–60.0715%23 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0417%23 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0111%23 Aug
ancient13–70.065%23 Aug
dust213–80.1214%22 Aug
anubis13–110.0214%22 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0011%22 Aug
dust213–9-0.009%22 Aug
cache13–0-0.0211%22 Aug
dust213–8-0.0514%21 Aug
cache10–130.0415%21 Aug
dust213–20.0110%21 Aug
dust23–130.0225%21 Aug
ancient16–140.0111%21 Aug
cache13–50.0614%21 Aug
cache13–80.0313%21 Aug
cache13–16-0.0117%20 Aug
ancient13–90.0017%20 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0313%20 Aug
dust26–13-0.0415%19 Aug
dust213–70.0917%19 Aug
dust28–130.1016%19 Aug
cache15–150.0026%18 Aug
ancient13–11-0.059%18 Aug
dust29–13-0.0323%18 Aug
dust210–13-0.0513%17 Aug
ancient9–130.0014%17 Aug
dust23–13-0.0411%17 Aug
dust213–7-0.089%16 Aug
anubis13–70.0213%16 Aug
cache11–13-0.059%16 Aug
dust214–160.0316%16 Aug
cache9–30.0115%16 Aug
dust210–130.0218%16 Aug
nuke13–90.0117%16 Aug
cache9–130.0519%16 Aug
dust25–13-0.086%16 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0014%15 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0119%15 Aug
dust26–13-0.0719%15 Aug
nuke1–13-0.079%15 Aug
anubis13–90.0614%14 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0416%14 Aug
dust215–15-0.0124%14 Aug
dust213–6-0.0120%13 Aug
dust28–130.0416%13 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0621%13 Aug
inferno9–20.1815%13 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0519%13 Aug
inferno13–50.1619%13 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0510%12 Aug
dust26–130.0213%12 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0313%12 Aug
dust28–13-0.0014%12 Aug
ancient9–00.1924%12 Aug
dust211–130.0210%12 Aug
cache10–130.0222%12 Aug
anubis8–130.0419%12 Aug
anubis13–90.047%12 Aug
inferno13–80.0111%12 Aug
dust26–130.0414%11 Aug
nuke13–100.019%11 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0220%11 Aug
ancient3–13-0.063%11 Aug
dust213–80.0430%10 Aug
dust213–10-0.0522%10 Aug
dust213–9-0.0418%10 Aug
cache16–12-0.0612%10 Aug
inferno2–110.0315%10 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0211%9 Aug
anubis7–13-0.069%9 Aug
cache13–40.0121%9 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0113%9 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0914%9 Aug
cache13–11-0.0315%9 Aug
dust213–90.0313%8 Aug
dust28–13-0.0611%8 Aug
dust213–60.0521%8 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0614%8 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0416%8 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →