nepz

nepz — CS2 Stats

76561198429234006[U:1:468968278]Steam profile ↗

363Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,041 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnepzFACEITLevel 10 · 2,041 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning44
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5050Last 10050%Win rateLLWLLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.0
Aggression2.2
Utility4.7
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 676ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning4.4
Utility4.7
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time661ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 661ms
Headshot accuracy23.8%−3.5%
first ⅓ avg 27.3% → last ⅓ avg 23.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — nuke 13–0
130Biggest win — vertigo
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
512In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 20% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB51272453%-0.01
anubisD1531220%-0.02
vertigoS107370%0.02
ancientS75271%0.02
nukeS64267%0.03
dust2D51420%-0.05
overpass32167%0.05
inferno2020%-0.08
train110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

911Matches
55%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
67.7ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
10%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9860%0.9313.3
Anubis2532%0.8913.1
Dust21953%0.9213.2
Ancient1362%0.8114.4
Vertigo667%1.3416.2
Nuke475%0.648.5
Inferno475%0.7813.3
Overpass20%0.6212.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy
30.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
676msReaction time
25.4%T opening success
24.8%CT opening success
0.76Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
8.26HE damage / grenade
10.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.3651% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage17–19-0.0122%17 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0523%16 Jul
overpass13–40.1237%28 Jun
mirage11–130.0724%3 Mar
ancient8–130.0233%3 Mar
mirage13–90.0123%2 Mar
dust213–16-0.0514%2 Mar
nuke1–13-0.086%22 Feb
dust24–13-0.0716%22 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0723%22 Feb
dust27–13-0.0632%22 Feb
dust24–13-0.0429%10 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0215%9 Feb
mirage13–50.0122%9 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0119%9 Feb
mirage16–13-0.0320%9 Feb
mirage13–60.0021%6 Feb
inferno3–9-0.1214%4 Feb
inferno3–9-0.0433%3 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0227%27 Jan
nuke11–140.0249%10 Jan
mirage13–60.0333%24 Jun
train13–8-0.0415%28 May
dust213–8-0.033%28 May
anubis9–130.0321%28 May
mirage13–9-0.0130%25 Jan
mirage13–9-0.0130%25 Jan
anubis5–130.0047%25 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0124%17 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0324%9 Mar
anubis13–50.0020%9 Mar
mirage13–100.0217%9 Mar
ancient13–110.0123%6 Mar
mirage8–130.0029%6 Mar
mirage13–40.0529%6 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0432%3 Mar
mirage2–13-0.159%3 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0924%29 Feb
ancient13–100.0130%29 Feb
mirage6–130.0132%28 Feb
mirage13–50.0035%28 Feb
mirage13–50.0326%28 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0121%27 Feb
anubis1–13-0.0515%26 Feb
mirage13–90.0834%26 Feb
anubis13–60.0432%23 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0223%23 Feb
mirage13–100.0318%22 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0115%20 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0720%20 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0526%16 Feb
anubis14–16-0.0424%14 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0120%12 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0728%11 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0238%10 Feb
mirage16–14-0.0131%10 Feb
anubis13–16-0.0614%10 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0316%10 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0632%8 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0412%6 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0614%6 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0225%6 Feb
mirage5–7-0.0840%6 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0742%4 Feb
mirage5–130.0227%4 Feb
vertigo13–90.1045%3 Feb
mirage18–22-0.0623%3 Feb
mirage13–4-0.0018%2 Feb
vertigo3–130.0421%2 Feb
vertigo13–00.0613%2 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0522%28 Jan
mirage3–13-0.0929%28 Jan
anubis5–13-0.0324%28 Jan
mirage13–80.0543%27 Jan
mirage13–70.0137%27 Jan
vertigo4–13-0.0923%26 Jan
anubis11–13-0.0326%22 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0430%22 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0128%21 Jan
ancient4–13-0.0428%19 Jan
anubis13–80.0530%19 Jan
vertigo13–90.0618%16 Jan
nuke13–3-0.0650%15 Jan
vertigo16–140.0620%15 Jan
vertigo13–7-0.0313%15 Jan
nuke13–50.0216%12 Jan
vertigo2–13-0.0453%10 Jan
nuke13–50.0331%9 Jan
ancient13–50.0131%9 Jan
vertigo13–30.0540%8 Jan
overpass13–110.0731%7 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0027%27 Dec
ancient13–70.0929%13 Dec
mirage11–130.0823%8 Dec
ancient13–60.0726%6 Dec
overpass9–13-0.0327%5 Dec
vertigo13–40.0417%28 Sept
mirage13–70.0533%28 Sept
nuke13–00.2620%27 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0126%23 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →