dazzibelle

dazzibelle — CS2 Stats

76561198427493973[U:1:467228245]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

307Tracked matches53%Win rate2025Tracked since
452Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating12,910Blue band · top ~39.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 927 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 4 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,910 +4,523 4 Jul18 Sept · 27 days played
4,99914,620peak 14,6204 Jul18 Sept
14,851Peak Premier in tracked matches
927Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-07-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 927
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 124 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-18
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,710 below peak (14,620)
  • +1,318 over 30 days · improving
  • +4,523 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 2,090 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,302), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate50.4%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy0.3%12.7%13.0%12.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.941.051.060.12 short
Match win rate51.9%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdazzibelleFACEITLevel 7 · 927 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER12,910 · Blue bandPEAK ELO927csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning41
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5941Last 10059%Win rateLLLLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · +22ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.9
Utility3.8
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.1
Utility3.8
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time579ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy18.2%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 7 Aug
32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · inferno, 1 Sept
422msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · mirage, 1 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 1 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
L4Current streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 16nukeWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB27131448%0.01
dust2A2012860%0.04
infernoS1913668%0.06
ancientS1611569%0.05
nukeB115645%0.04
anubisS64267%0.05
cache110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

8,377Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
426Matches
51.9%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 7 players
50.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
0.3%Shot accuracy
1,223MVPs
172Hours (in match)
212Bombs planted
99Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

919dust2
661inferno
438nuke
58train
14vertigo
13office
12italy
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

163Matches
54%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
85.4ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5157%0.9713.9
Dust23241%1.1418.6
Ancient2544%1.1417.6
Inferno2255%0.9517.2
Nuke1867%0.9717.6
Anubis1070%1.3420.1
Overpass367%1.3816.0
Cache2100%1.0016.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.0%Spray accuracy
83.0%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
585msReaction time
32.7%T opening success
40.3%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
5.12HE damage / grenade
6.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.6814% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–13-0.0616%15 Sept
nuke11–130.0421%14 Sept
dust27–130.0920%14 Sept
mirage8–13-0.058%14 Sept
dust213–20.0226%13 Sept
dust212–160.0113%13 Sept
inferno13–30.1326%10 Sept
dust216–140.1325%10 Sept
ancient13–40.0630%10 Sept
mirage16–140.0311%5 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0813%5 Sept
inferno11–130.0626%5 Sept
mirage9–130.0517%4 Sept
mirage13–00.0410%1 Sept
mirage3–13-0.110%1 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0324%1 Sept
dust213–70.1821%1 Sept
dust25–130.1019%1 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0432%1 Sept
anubis13–90.0013%1 Sept
dust213–110.0120%28 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0511%27 Aug
nuke11–130.0315%27 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0323%27 Aug
cache13–8-0.0112%27 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0619%27 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0618%27 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0219%23 Aug
nuke13–20.0811%23 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0023%23 Aug
inferno13–50.1022%22 Aug
dust213–100.0725%21 Aug
mirage13–50.1014%21 Aug
mirage13–40.056%18 Aug
mirage13–20.0221%18 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0513%18 Aug
nuke11–130.1016%18 Aug
dust213–70.0722%18 Aug
inferno13–110.0620%16 Aug
ancient14–160.0618%15 Aug
dust213–100.0514%15 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0317%15 Aug
dust210–2-0.0129%14 Aug
ancient13–60.1618%13 Aug
ancient6–110.0816%13 Aug
inferno9–130.0815%13 Aug
anubis13–90.1615%12 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0113%12 Aug
ancient13–50.1120%12 Aug
nuke16–140.0819%12 Aug
ancient16–140.1218%11 Aug
inferno13–30.1025%11 Aug
mirage13–30.0417%11 Aug
inferno13–40.1213%7 Aug
dust21–13-0.0018%7 Aug
anubis13–30.2212%7 Aug
inferno13–110.0613%7 Aug
inferno13–50.1513%6 Aug
dust213–80.1518%6 Aug
mirage13–60.0413%6 Aug
mirage13–30.0815%5 Aug
ancient13–80.118%4 Aug
nuke13–80.069%4 Aug
inferno13–80.0914%4 Aug
mirage11–40.1110%4 Aug
ancient13–80.0115%4 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0225%3 Aug
ancient8–00.0719%3 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0126%3 Aug
inferno5–130.029%3 Aug
nuke13–110.0412%3 Aug
ancient13–100.0215%3 Aug
mirage16–130.0418%3 Aug
inferno13–10.1024%3 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0222%3 Aug
nuke3–13-0.090%31 Jul
mirage13–100.1913%31 Jul
nuke8–130.1122%31 Jul
dust22–130.0316%31 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0614%31 Jul
inferno13–70.079%27 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0229%27 Jul
dust213–11-0.0216%25 Jul
anubis10–13-0.039%25 Jul
dust213–50.019%24 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0421%18 Jul
dust211–8-0.0331%16 Jul
mirage2–13-0.034%16 Jul
dust23–13-0.048%15 Jul
ancient13–50.0015%15 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0210%15 Jul
ancient13–80.0919%15 Jul
ancient1–130.0410%6 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0316%6 Jul
inferno13–70.0614%6 Jul
mirage8–130.0217%6 Jul
dust211–13-0.0111%5 Jul
mirage0–4-0.0314%5 Jul
inferno10–130.0128%5 Jul
dust27–13-0.0019%4 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →