โ˜†๐“ก๐“ธ๐“ซ๐“พโ˜†

โ˜†๐“ก๐“ธ๐“ซ๐“พโ˜† โ€” CS2 Stats

76561198421281145[U:1:461015417]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

1,159Tracked matches59%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,171Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,022Purple band ยท top ~24.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Oct 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,022 +1,513 19 Aug โ€“ 3 Oct ยท 20 days played
14,00016,371peak 16,37119 Aug3 Oct
16,371Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-08-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 349 below peak (16,371)
  • +2,022 over 30 days ยท improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 โ€” 3,978 to go
  • Reached: Purple band ยท Blue band ยท Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,998), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate47.6%42.7%43.7%above
Shot accuracy5.1%11.3%12.0%6.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.090.991.02above
Match win rate48.2%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGโ˜†๐“ก๐“ธ๐“ซ๐“พโ˜†FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER16,022 ยท Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning74
Utility56

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54โ€“42โ€“4Last 10054%Win rateWLLWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: โˆ’10pp win rate ยท +0.02 avg rating ยท +0.1pp headshot accuracy ยท โˆ’69ms reaction

Win rate โˆ’10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” within the normal variation of a 10-match window (ยฑ20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3โ€“2 ยท 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 10

  • 5โ€“5 ยท 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 20

  • 11โ€“9 ยท 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player โ€” Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility5.6
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels6.3
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 70% T opening-duel success โ€” entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped โ€” moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning7.4
Utility5.6
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels8.3
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01โˆ’0.00
first โ…“ avg 0.01 โ†’ last โ…“ avg 0.01
Reaction time565ms+47ms
first โ…“ avg 518ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy25.2%+5.2%
first โ…“ avg 19.9% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 25.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating ยท 13โ€“3 ยท inferno, 25 Aug โ†’
45%Best headshot accuracy ยท 4โ€“9 ยท inferno, 30 Aug โ†’
391msFastest reaction time ยท 6โ€“13 ยท ancient, 27 Sept โ†’
13โ€“0Biggest win ยท cache, 25 Aug โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
5โ€“7In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map ยท 67% over 18anubisWeakest map ยท 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB2110โ€“1148%0.02
ancientS1812โ€“667%0.01
mirageS1711โ€“665%0.01
infernoB178โ€“947%0.01
dust2S96โ€“367%0.01
nukeA85โ€“363%-0.00
anubisD82โ€“625%0.02
vertigoโ€”10โ€“10%-0.02
trainโ€”10โ€“10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

58,327Lifetime kills
1.09K/D ยท Top 50% of Level 4 players
3,462Matches
48.2%Match win rate ยท Top 25% of Level 4 players
47.6%Headshot % ยท Top 50% of Level 4 players
5.1%Shot accuracy
11,978MVPs
1,188Hours (in match)
2,320Bombs planted
1,755Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,100
AWP10,246
SSG 081,550
MP91,365
AUG721

Lifetime map wins

6,673inferno
3,980nuke
2,853dust2
1,612vertigo
982train
215cbble
132lake
37italy

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

75Matches
47%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
77.2ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1844%1.2517.3
Nuke1242%1.1317.1
Inferno1267%1.1513.3
Anubis1136%0.9714.2
Ancient1060%0.9313.2
Dust2520%1.0012.6
Cache560%0.9515.6
Vertigo10%0.8416.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.1%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.9%Spray accuracy
67.8%Counter-strafing
7.9ยฐPreaim
565msReaction time
70.0%T opening success
56.1%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
8.82HE damage / grenade
13.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4826 โ€” below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups โ†’
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy โ†’Anubis grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13โ€“10-0.0132%7 Oct โ†’
dust25โ€“130.1021%7 Oct โ†’
inferno9โ€“13-0.0221%3 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“10-0.0329%3 Oct โ†’
mirage16โ€“140.0427%30 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“30.0329%30 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“9-0.0129%30 Sept โ†’
anubis3โ€“13-0.0113%27 Sept โ†’
cache4โ€“130.0235%27 Sept โ†’
ancient6โ€“130.0038%27 Sept โ†’
ancient4โ€“60.0333%26 Sept โ†’
vertigo11โ€“13-0.0234%23 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“60.0124%20 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“7-0.0323%19 Sept โ†’
cache13โ€“10-0.0526%19 Sept โ†’
ancient3โ€“13-0.1217%19 Sept โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0024%19 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“4-0.0032%18 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“10.0243%18 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“90.0916%18 Sept โ†’
cache13โ€“90.0423%13 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“90.1034%13 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“90.0226%13 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“60.0421%12 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“10-0.019%10 Sept โ†’
cache2โ€“13-0.0516%10 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.1722%10 Sept โ†’
mirage1โ€“13-0.0522%10 Sept โ†’
ancient8โ€“13-0.0322%9 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“90.0423%8 Sept โ†’
inferno12โ€“12-0.0823%6 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“10-0.0221%3 Sept โ†’
cache9โ€“13-0.0222%2 Sept โ†’
cache7โ€“13-0.0023%2 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“100.0412%1 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“9-0.0015%1 Sept โ†’
ancient1โ€“8-0.0522%31 Aug โ†’
cache11โ€“13-0.0026%31 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“8-0.0017%31 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“90.0610%31 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“10.1717%31 Aug โ†’
mirage1โ€“13-0.0810%31 Aug โ†’
dust24โ€“13-0.026%31 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“60.0311%30 Aug โ†’
cache10โ€“130.0823%30 Aug โ†’
cache11โ€“13-0.0420%30 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“110.0225%30 Aug โ†’
inferno11โ€“13-0.0117%30 Aug โ†’
inferno8โ€“80.0124%30 Aug โ†’
inferno4โ€“90.0445%30 Aug โ†’
cache7โ€“130.0537%30 Aug โ†’
cache8โ€“130.0923%30 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“2-0.0311%28 Aug โ†’
train2โ€“13-0.028%27 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“30.1829%27 Aug โ†’
inferno9โ€“2-0.028%26 Aug โ†’
ancient2โ€“13-0.045%26 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“11-0.0618%26 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“8-0.0436%26 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“60.1518%26 Aug โ†’
inferno7โ€“9-0.0114%25 Aug โ†’
inferno9โ€“00.1825%25 Aug โ†’
inferno0โ€“9-0.2418%25 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“00.0117%25 Aug โ†’
cache7โ€“13-0.0725%25 Aug โ†’
nuke2โ€“130.0138%25 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“3-0.0022%25 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“110.0124%25 Aug โ†’
inferno3โ€“13-0.0618%25 Aug โ†’
dust215โ€“150.0126%25 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“30.1922%25 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“80.1129%23 Aug โ†’
anubis12โ€“160.0124%21 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“50.0319%21 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“6-0.0227%21 Aug โ†’
anubis12โ€“160.0316%21 Aug โ†’
inferno11โ€“13-0.0037%21 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“110.0011%21 Aug โ†’
mirage3โ€“13-0.0511%21 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“5-0.0120%21 Aug โ†’
nuke2โ€“13-0.1024%21 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“70.0113%21 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“10-0.0011%21 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“1-0.0117%20 Aug โ†’
nuke4โ€“13-0.0416%20 Aug โ†’
anubis7โ€“130.0324%20 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“90.0740%20 Aug โ†’
anubis5โ€“130.015%20 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“80.0418%20 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“80.0718%20 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“60.0226%20 Aug โ†’
mirage12โ€“16-0.0414%19 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“70.0217%19 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“60.0315%19 Aug โ†’
anubis15โ€“15-0.0513%19 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“20.0723%19 Aug โ†’
cache6โ€“13-0.0620%19 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“9-0.0015%19 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“60.0318%19 Aug โ†’
mirage8โ€“13-0.0231%19 Aug โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.