vertt1

vertt1 — CS2 Stats

76561198410776696[U:1:450510968]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,706Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,367Top 10% of 212,695 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18591 of 259598 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,809 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,367 -367 4 Jul – 1 Nov · 14 days played
23,61025,734peak 25,7344 Jul1 Nov
Faceit ELO: 2,809 +0 28 Aug – 22 Sept · 4 observations
2,8092,809peak 2,80928 Aug22 Sept
25,734Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,809Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-06-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,809
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 191 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 367 below peak (25,734)
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,633 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGvertt1FACEITLevel 10 · 2,809 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,367 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,809csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning57
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateLLWLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −2.8pp headshot accuracy · −63ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 487ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility7.2
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.7
Utility7.2
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time542ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy15.3%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 11 Oct →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · train, 7 Oct →
328msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · dust2, 15 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 19 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
4–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 82% over 11anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2517–868%0.04
cacheC146–843%0.03
infernoA148–657%0.02
mirageD134–931%-0.00
ancientS119–282%0.06
anubisD103–730%0.00
dust2C83–538%0.01
train—20–20%-0.00
vertigo—21–150%-0.01
overpass—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,573Matches
53%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
83.2ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage46952%1.1116.2
Nuke42658%1.3017.3
Anubis20153%1.1216.0
Ancient17046%1.1415.4
Dust215245%1.0916.3
Train12150%1.2116.9
Inferno10456%1.0515.4
Overpass5457%1.1017.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.7%Headshot accuracy
40.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.0%Spray accuracy
67.8%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
540msReaction time
36.1%T opening success
53.8%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
11.4%Flash assists
13.66HE damage / grenade
10.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.6901% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.1437% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.0215%1 Nov →
nuke8–13-0.0511%1 Nov →
ancient13–70.017%1 Nov →
nuke4–13-0.043%31 Oct →
cache5–130.0413%30 Oct →
inferno13–80.0717%30 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0132%30 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0211%30 Oct →
ancient6–130.059%29 Oct →
ancient12–50.0616%29 Oct →
cache13–70.0319%29 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0123%29 Oct →
anubis6–130.0823%29 Oct →
cache16–130.0510%28 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0511%28 Oct →
nuke13–60.107%28 Oct →
cache7–130.0221%28 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.069%28 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0613%27 Oct →
inferno13–40.0226%27 Oct →
inferno7–00.0231%27 Oct →
nuke8–130.0316%20 Oct →
nuke13–100.049%20 Oct →
anubis14–160.0211%20 Oct →
inferno15–150.0111%19 Oct →
anubis11–5-0.059%19 Oct →
ancient13–20.1520%19 Oct →
dust213–60.0527%19 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0119%19 Oct →
cache11–130.0110%16 Oct →
mirage13–60.0520%15 Oct →
mirage13–30.0016%15 Oct →
dust213–10-0.018%15 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0216%15 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0114%14 Oct →
cache7–130.039%14 Oct →
inferno14–160.0614%12 Oct →
dust213–90.1116%12 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0415%12 Oct →
ancient13–70.0911%12 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0412%12 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0215%11 Oct →
nuke13–100.1216%11 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.018%11 Oct →
cache13–50.1513%11 Oct →
nuke13–50.0418%11 Oct →
inferno13–60.0212%10 Oct →
train6–130.0141%7 Oct →
cache10–130.019%7 Oct →
inferno5–20.0225%7 Oct →
nuke0–13-0.0817%7 Oct →
cache0–13-0.0013%7 Oct →
vertigo13–50.0319%4 Oct →
nuke13–40.1313%4 Oct →
anubis4–130.0416%3 Oct →
ancient13–100.0316%1 Oct →
train7–13-0.0211%30 Sept →
nuke13–50.1016%30 Sept →
ancient13–110.085%24 Sept →
nuke13–20.049%24 Sept →
nuke13–90.0217%23 Sept →
cache13–70.0421%23 Sept →
anubis5–130.0211%23 Sept →
mirage2–130.0419%23 Sept →
vertigo0–4-0.040%23 Sept →
dust211–130.0019%23 Sept →
nuke12–120.0627%12 Sept →
cache13–110.0721%10 Sept →
nuke13–80.028%10 Sept →
mirage13–50.1514%7 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0320%7 Sept →
ancient13–20.0113%7 Sept →
anubis11–130.1015%7 Sept →
nuke13–100.0116%7 Sept →
nuke13–50.068%4 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.1118%4 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0110%2 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0313%31 Aug →
inferno5–130.0714%31 Aug →
nuke13–60.1116%24 Aug →
nuke13–40.0619%24 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0010%24 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0013%4 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0314%4 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.034%4 Aug →
mirage13–100.0114%27 Jul →
ancient13–80.1215%23 Jul →
nuke13–70.0624%4 Jul →
inferno1–13-0.0719%4 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.019%4 Jul →
dust211–130.058%4 Jul →
ancient13–40.0217%4 Jul →
overpass16–120.0618%4 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.1018%4 Jul →
inferno13–30.1127%4 Jul →
nuke13–60.0921%3 Jul →
inferno13–110.0310%2 Jul →
nuke13–20.1418%2 Jul →
mirage7–130.0119%28 Jun →
cache5–13-0.0424%18 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.