大土豆

大土豆 — CS2 Stats

IM76561198410039724[U:1:449773996]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

1,238Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,704Hours in CS28Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating21,778Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#51603 of 220536 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,569 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 16 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,778 +4,231 23 Jul16 Sept · 33 days played
16,15524,186peak 24,18623 Jul16 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,569 +0 31 Aug15 Sept · 2 observations
1,5691,569peak 1,56931 Aug15 Sept
24,186Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,569Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-07-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,569
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 182 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,408 below peak (24,186)
  • +4,898 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,222 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate48.5%48.3%51.0%2.5% short
Shot accuracy15.2%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.051.071.090.04 short
Match win rate42.4%46.9%48.4%6.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG大土豆FACEITLevel 9 · 1,569 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,778 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,569csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning54
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46495Last 10046%Win rateLLLLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +10.8pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility5.7
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Flashes. 0.79 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.4
Utility5.7
Mechanics9.1
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time575ms−61ms
first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 9–3 · nuke, 10 Sept
60%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · mirage, 27 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 14–16 · inferno, 3 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 2 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L5Current streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 10infernoWeakest map · 39% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B26131350%0.01
mirageC25101540%-0.02
infernoC1871139%0.01
nukeS107370%0.00
cacheC73443%-0.00
ancientC73443%0.01
anubisC52340%0.02
eldorado1010%-0.12
shelter110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

74,928Lifetime kills
1.05K/D
3,628Matches
42.4%Match win rate
48.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
15.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
8,263MVPs
2,120Hours (in match)
4,689Bombs planted
812Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4731,143
AWP5,569
FAMAS2,164
SSG 081,470
MP91,240

Lifetime map wins

5,470inferno
5,022dust2
1,800nuke
1,370office
1,066vertigo
812train
241cbble
64lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

328Matches
54%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
78.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6754%0.9414.8
Dust26549%0.9415.0
Inferno4264%1.0315.0
Nuke2065%1.0214.9
Anubis1735%1.1916.2
Ancient1644%0.9414.4
Overpass1250%1.2315.1
Vertigo250%0.9213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
39.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
90.8%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
572msReaction time
48.7%T opening success
37.3%CT opening success
0.79Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
8.20HE damage / grenade
8.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.3257% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache3–13-0.0733%16 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0127%16 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0534%15 Sept
inferno11–130.0125%14 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0720%14 Sept
cache13–110.0027%13 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0826%13 Sept
dust213–50.0529%13 Sept
anubis10–30.0724%12 Sept
inferno10–130.0425%12 Sept
mirage15–150.0115%11 Sept
dust216–12-0.0211%10 Sept
nuke9–30.2217%10 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0217%10 Sept
dust213–70.0112%10 Sept
inferno2–10-0.0420%7 Sept
ancient13–80.0212%6 Sept
dust213–11-0.0413%6 Sept
cache13–10.1218%6 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0929%6 Sept
nuke13–40.0426%6 Sept
dust213–80.0117%6 Sept
dust213–30.0621%6 Sept
ancient13–80.0528%5 Sept
dust213–6-0.0020%5 Sept
mirage13–100.0215%5 Sept
mirage16–140.0610%5 Sept
inferno14–16-0.0723%3 Sept
dust28–130.0128%3 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0214%2 Sept
mirage13–100.0519%1 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0412%31 Aug
dust213–50.0717%31 Aug
nuke13–20.0226%30 Aug
dust213–9-0.0113%30 Aug
inferno13–100.039%30 Aug
anubis11–130.0411%30 Aug
dust26–13-0.0319%28 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0121%28 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0960%27 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0714%27 Aug
dust213–6-0.0410%27 Aug
eldorado8–8-0.1236%26 Aug
shelter12–30.0923%26 Aug
cache5–13-0.0219%26 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0127%23 Aug
dust27–10.0324%23 Aug
dust217–19-0.0310%22 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0520%22 Aug
inferno13–70.1016%22 Aug
dust213–40.1930%20 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0019%18 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0118%17 Aug
dust28–13-0.0110%16 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0610%15 Aug
inferno13–20.070%13 Aug
inferno5–90.0237%12 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0414%10 Aug
mirage2–8-0.100%9 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0643%9 Aug
mirage13–90.0221%9 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0118%8 Aug
dust29–13-0.0616%8 Aug
dust213–80.0417%8 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0127%8 Aug
mirage8–130.0320%5 Aug
cache13–70.0420%5 Aug
mirage5–130.0326%4 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0211%3 Aug
dust27–130.024%3 Aug
dust27–130.0221%2 Aug
ancient5–8-0.0527%2 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0120%2 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0814%2 Aug
nuke13–40.1014%2 Aug
mirage13–00.0610%2 Aug
mirage13–100.0215%31 Jul
cache7–13-0.0221%30 Jul
ancient3–130.0622%29 Jul
dust28–13-0.0520%27 Jul
cache8–13-0.089%25 Jul
dust212–120.0323%25 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0212%25 Jul
dust211–13-0.0417%25 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0521%23 Jul
ancient13–110.0220%23 Jul
inferno2–80.008%22 Jul
dust26–130.0521%22 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0111%21 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0325%20 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0316%19 Jul
mirage4–13-0.059%18 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0518%18 Jul
inferno13–50.109%18 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0310%18 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0022%18 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0418%16 Jul
dust210–13-0.0122%16 Jul
anubis6–130.0019%16 Jul
dust26–13-0.0217%16 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →