Blooom

Blooom — CS2 Stats

SJ76561198409084999[U:1:448819271]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,084Tracked matches56%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,873Top 25% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#40092 of 226096 tracked
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 22,873 → 22,873
0Faceit ELO · 2,102 → 2,102
+1Tracked matches · now 3,084
+2.0ppWin rate · 53.6% → 55.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 7 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,873 +2,116 9 May17 Sept · 21 days played
19,57123,426peak 23,4269 May17 Sept
23,788Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,102Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-05-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,102
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 398 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-17
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 553 below peak (23,426)
  • +2,358 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,873 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,127 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBlooomPREMIER22,873 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,102csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning62
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50437Last 10050%Win rateTLLWTLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +3.6pp headshot accuracy · +67ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 122 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 10

  • 352 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 20

  • 974 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility4.9
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.2
Utility4.9
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact6.9

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time537ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy15.5%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 13.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 9–5 · debris, 15 Aug
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · mirage, 5 Jun
375msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · cache, 3 Sept
13–0Biggest win · cache, 1 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 100% over 8dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB23111248%0.01
mirageA2112957%0.04
cacheC1871139%0.01
ancientS880100%0.03
vertigoC73443%0.03
nukeC73443%-0.02
dust2D51420%-0.02
overpass220100%0.12
anubis21150%0.03
debris21150%0.15
poseidon1010%-0.14
train1010%0.01
shelter1010%0.07
fachwerk1010%-0.03
boulder110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

385Matches
55%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
73.3ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6048%1.0815.7
Ancient5556%0.9214.7
Inferno5560%1.0215.2
Anubis4556%0.8512.9
Nuke2959%1.0716.2
Vertigo2442%1.0916.2
Dust22157%0.8914.0
Overpass1471%1.0313.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.2%Spray accuracy
73.8%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
527msReaction time
40.1%T opening success
51.5%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
6.66HE damage / grenade
8.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4538 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno12–120.0520%18 Sept
cache10–13-0.0515%16 Sept
mirage5–130.0930%11 Sept
overpass9–00.187%6 Sept
inferno8–8-0.0922%6 Sept
cache1–13-0.0313%6 Sept
inferno10–130.1115%6 Sept
dust28–13-0.1113%5 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0114%5 Sept
inferno13–100.0215%5 Sept
cache13–9-0.0319%5 Sept
mirage13–20.0914%4 Sept
inferno9–7-0.0215%4 Sept
cache12–120.0015%3 Sept
cache13–11-0.0111%3 Sept
vertigo12–12-0.0111%3 Sept
cache5–130.1511%2 Sept
cache13–00.0411%1 Sept
nuke13–16-0.0311%1 Sept
ancient13–9-0.019%1 Sept
inferno13–60.0712%31 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0319%31 Aug
mirage13–10.0418%29 Aug
mirage13–90.0216%28 Aug
ancient13–90.0911%25 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0820%23 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0215%17 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0514%16 Aug
anubis13–60.0722%16 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0119%16 Aug
cache5–13-0.0218%16 Aug
ancient16–13-0.029%16 Aug
nuke13–80.0227%16 Aug
poseidon4–9-0.1430%16 Aug
debris4–9-0.0033%16 Aug
inferno2–9-0.0517%16 Aug
mirage11–130.0212%16 Aug
cache9–2-0.030%15 Aug
train12–120.0113%15 Aug
ancient13–70.0713%15 Aug
debris9–50.2915%15 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0310%15 Aug
ancient13–110.0025%15 Aug
mirage13–100.0715%14 Aug
mirage5–130.0222%28 Jul
ancient13–100.0813%28 Jul
inferno13–100.0315%28 Jul
mirage13–20.1326%28 Jul
inferno13–4-0.026%28 Jul
cache3–13-0.0113%27 Jul
vertigo13–90.079%17 Jul
inferno13–100.0817%17 Jul
cache8–130.0918%16 Jul
shelter7–130.0716%15 Jul
fachwerk5–13-0.0319%13 Jul
boulder13–1-0.0219%13 Jul
anubis5–13-0.013%10 Jul
inferno11–130.0217%3 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0116%3 Jul
mirage15–150.0914%15 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0311%14 Jun
ancient13–50.008%13 Jun
cache11–13-0.074%13 Jun
mirage16–140.1018%5 Jun
mirage13–40.0719%5 Jun
mirage0–3-0.01100%5 Jun
dust213–70.1015%5 Jun
dust26–130.0116%4 Jun
ancient13–80.0213%4 Jun
cache12–120.027%4 Jun
mirage13–40.1118%4 Jun
vertigo1–13-0.0318%31 May
mirage3–130.0419%31 May
inferno11–13-0.008%28 May
nuke16–14-0.0519%28 May
cache5–13-0.0012%23 May
nuke11–13-0.0514%22 May
inferno13–110.0216%20 May
dust29–13-0.0421%20 May
overpass13–20.0514%20 May
cache13–110.0414%20 May
dust25–13-0.046%20 May
inferno13–9-0.0213%20 May
nuke13–110.0316%19 May
mirage13–90.0713%19 May
inferno13–70.1010%19 May
inferno8–130.1020%19 May
cache11–13-0.0313%18 May
vertigo9–130.089%18 May
vertigo4–130.0311%18 May
cache13–10-0.0013%18 May
vertigo13–90.0611%18 May
inferno3–13-0.0010%16 May
mirage6–130.0018%15 May
nuke8–13-0.038%10 May
inferno3–13-0.0424%9 May
mirage13–5-0.0111%9 May
inferno13–10-0.0121%9 May
vertigo13–100.019%8 May
cache13–100.0515%7 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →