st0nk

st0nk — CS2 Stats

EE76561198407068848[U:1:446803120]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,804Tracked matches67%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,442Top 50% of 204,056 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#90155 of 251153 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,497 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Sep 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 19,442 → 19,442
0Faceit ELO · 1,497 → 1,497
+27Tracked matches · now 1,804
+3.7ppWin rate · 63.0% → 66.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,442 -119 14 Sept – 27 Sept · 3 days played
19,44219,561peak 19,56114 Sept27 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,497 +0 4 Sept – 27 Sept · 3 observations
1,4971,497peak 1,4974 Sept27 Sept
19,561Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,497Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2026-08-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,497
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 34 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 119 below peak (19,561)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 558 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-27
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-27

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGst0nkFACEITLevel 8 · 1,497 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,442 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,497csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning56
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–36–9Last 10055%Win rateWLLWWLWLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.9pp headshot accuracy · +73ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility5.0
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.6
Utility5.0
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time521ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 557ms → last ⅓ avg 521ms
Headshot accuracy24.4%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 26.8% → last ⅓ avg 24.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 7 Aug →
49%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · dust2, 9 Aug →
172msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 4 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 20 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 46% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2714–1352%0.02
dust2A2011–955%0.00
mirageB136–746%-0.00
ancientB137–654%0.02
nukeA116–555%-0.02
anubisA106–460%-0.01
cacheS65–183%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 13). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

861Matches
49%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
84.1ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage26248%1.0416.1
Ancient17253%1.1417.5
Dust217153%1.1216.5
Inferno10355%1.2317.5
Nuke8540%1.0517.1
Anubis3027%0.9515.3
Overpass1844%0.9215.2
Train1250%1.2416.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
76.3%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
527msReaction time
45.5%T opening success
48.5%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
8.30HE damage / grenade
9.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.426 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–5-0.0321%7 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0613%4 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0624%4 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0011%3 Oct →
inferno13–50.1138%2 Oct →
nuke3–9-0.0644%1 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0714%1 Oct →
inferno12–16-0.0022%29 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0136%28 Sept →
ancient12–120.1325%27 Sept →
mirage15–190.0113%25 Sept →
nuke13–80.1231%25 Sept →
ancient13–30.0420%25 Sept →
inferno9–20.1324%24 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0830%23 Sept →
dust213–50.0322%23 Sept →
dust20–5-0.140%22 Sept →
anubis4–130.0224%22 Sept →
dust213–100.0215%19 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0328%18 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0028%17 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0131%17 Sept →
mirage13–40.0529%16 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0130%15 Sept →
anubis13–90.0325%14 Sept →
ancient13–30.0217%14 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0321%13 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0315%12 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0335%12 Sept →
ancient13–80.0435%11 Sept →
inferno9–60.0829%10 Sept →
nuke5–9-0.1938%10 Sept →
dust213–80.0318%9 Sept →
nuke9–7-0.0226%7 Sept →
inferno5–130.0124%5 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0310%5 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0116%5 Sept →
dust29–130.0416%4 Sept →
dust213–100.0327%4 Sept →
inferno7–90.0524%3 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0236%3 Sept →
inferno12–120.0425%2 Sept →
mirage4–130.0320%2 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0124%1 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0620%1 Sept →
inferno13–100.0231%31 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0114%31 Aug →
dust211–130.0232%28 Aug →
dust211–130.0129%27 Aug →
nuke13–70.0438%26 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0317%26 Aug →
inferno8–130.0137%26 Aug →
anubis12–120.0023%24 Aug →
inferno13–100.0126%24 Aug →
cache13–70.0731%24 Aug →
dust212–120.0116%23 Aug →
dust213–40.0323%23 Aug →
nuke12–120.0039%20 Aug →
ancient13–20.0013%20 Aug →
dust213–90.0026%20 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0029%19 Aug →
mirage16–120.0427%19 Aug →
mirage13–30.0031%18 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0617%17 Aug →
ancient7–130.0319%16 Aug →
cache13–30.0820%16 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0316%15 Aug →
ancient12–120.0225%15 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0911%15 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0138%14 Aug →
inferno13–110.0124%12 Aug →
ancient13–50.0034%12 Aug →
dust213–60.1029%12 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0331%11 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0734%10 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0420%10 Aug →
nuke13–50.0445%9 Aug →
dust213–60.0335%9 Aug →
dust213–50.0849%9 Aug →
inferno8–80.0423%9 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0418%9 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0227%9 Aug →
inferno13–50.1125%8 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0231%8 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0225%8 Aug →
nuke9–4-0.0817%8 Aug →
cache13–80.1529%8 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0023%8 Aug →
mirage13–50.1528%7 Aug →
ancient6–130.0727%7 Aug →
inferno13–30.1640%7 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0114%7 Aug →
nuke5–9-0.0613%6 Aug →
inferno7–90.0528%5 Aug →
anubis13–80.0629%5 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0424%5 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0030%5 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.110%4 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0133%3 Aug →
inferno9–60.0928%2 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.