🔥BOYKE🔥 — CS2 Stats

PL76561198401258863[U:1:440993135]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,292Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,533Hours in CS41Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport

Premier CS Rating25,405Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#16094 of 221203 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,577 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 25,405 → 25,405

0Faceit ELO · 1,577 → 1,577

+6Tracked matches · now 1,292

+10.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 60.0%

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 21 days played since 17 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,405 +730 18 Aug – 16 Sept · 9 days played

Faceit ELO: 1,577 +0 9 Sept – 16 Sept · 3 observations

25,405Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,577Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

21Days played since 2026-08-17

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,577
Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 174 to go
Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
Level 8 first seen 2026-09-09
Level 7 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 25,405
+730 over 30 days · improving
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,595 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-09-09
Pink band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

Metric	Last 7	Previous 7	Change
Matches	31	25	+6
Win rate	48%	56%	−8pp
K/D	0.72	0.70	+0.02
Headshot %	67%	65%	+2pp

Measured 10 Sep 2026 → 17 Sep 2026; previous 1 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 9 median	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	53.8%	48.3%	51.0%	above
Shot accuracy	14.2%	13.2%	13.7%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.97	1.07	1.09	0.12 short
Match win rate	44.1%	46.9%	48.4%	4.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76

Positioning50

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–46Last 10054%Win rateWWWLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · −25ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

4–1 · 80% win rate
Avg rating -0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 29%
Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

8–2 · 80% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 30%
Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

13–7 · 65% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 30%
Avg reaction 569ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.6

Utility6.0

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels1.0

Clutch3.4

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 51% on T to 31% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 596ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6

Positioning5.0

Utility6.0

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels2.8

Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time584ms+22ms

first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms

Headshot accuracy30.7%−1.8%

first ⅓ avg 32.5% → last ⅓ avg 30.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.32Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 2 Sept →

63%Best headshot accuracy · 0–8 · mirage, 25 Aug →

328msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 27 Aug →

13–1Biggest win · ancient, 15 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

W3Current streak

9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 48% over 21

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	26	13–13	50%	-0.02
inferno	B	21	10–11	48%	-0.01
anubis	A	14	8–6	57%	-0.01
cache	B	12	6–6	50%	-0.05
ancient	S	11	8–3	73%	-0.00
dust2	A	11	6–5	55%	-0.02
nuke	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

88,700Lifetime kills

0.97K/D

4,820Matches

44.1%Match win rate

53.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players

14.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players

15,029MVPs

1,977Hours (in match)

3,888Bombs planted

936Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,046

M4A4 / M4A1-S14,533

AWP10,321

Desert Eagle9,597

P2000 / USP-S5,630

Glock-182,918

Galil AR1,796

Knife1,776

SSG 081,710

P2501,248

Lifetime map wins

4,034dust2

3,758inferno

1,920train

1,591nuke

1,010vertigo

301cbble

80lake

47office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

984Matches

52%Win rate

0.99Avg K/D

72.6ADR

61%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	238	58%	1.00	14.5
Anubis	128	45%	0.95	14.8
Dust2	116	42%	1.01	15.1
Ancient	89	54%	0.92	13.7
Inferno	85	56%	0.98	14.0
Nuke	70	47%	0.99	15.0
Cache	42	55%	0.85	13.7
Overpass	17	47%	0.89	13.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.2%Headshot accuracy

30.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

29.7%Spray accuracy

81.7%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

596msReaction time

51.3%T opening success

31.2%CT opening success

0.73Enemies flashed / flash

7.5%Flash assists

9.21HE damage / grenade

7.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 31.2322% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–4	-0.03	27%	16 Sept →
ancient	16–14	-0.05	26%	16 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.01	30%	16 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.08	29%	16 Sept →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	32%	16 Sept →
anubis	13–2	0.08	50%	16 Sept →
ancient	13–1	0.09	28%	15 Sept →
mirage	13–10	-0.06	32%	15 Sept →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	28%	15 Sept →
mirage	13–5	-0.04	19%	15 Sept →
inferno	8–13	-0.07	28%	15 Sept →
cache	11–13	-0.06	41%	15 Sept →
anubis	13–6	-0.00	33%	15 Sept →
inferno	9–2	0.07	48%	15 Sept →
inferno	6–9	-0.20	25%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–7	-0.01	24%	14 Sept →
ancient	13–11	0.01	23%	13 Sept →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	26%	13 Sept →
cache	8–13	-0.05	30%	13 Sept →
mirage	13–16	-0.04	23%	13 Sept →
cache	13–3	-0.01	31%	13 Sept →
anubis	11–13	-0.00	26%	13 Sept →
cache	16–13	-0.03	25%	12 Sept →
mirage	7–13	-0.09	47%	12 Sept →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	26%	12 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	35%	12 Sept →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	30%	12 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	24%	11 Sept →
inferno	9–13	0.00	50%	11 Sept →
nuke	13–6	-0.00	29%	11 Sept →
anubis	13–9	0.01	26%	6 Sept →
nuke	13–4	0.02	41%	6 Sept →
cache	13–8	-0.07	24%	6 Sept →
inferno	13–7	-0.04	23%	6 Sept →
anubis	4–13	0.00	38%	4 Sept →
cache	17–19	-0.04	33%	4 Sept →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	30%	4 Sept →
mirage	13–16	-0.03	23%	4 Sept →
mirage	9–13	0.07	24%	4 Sept →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	24%	3 Sept →
anubis	13–4	-0.02	33%	3 Sept →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	21%	3 Sept →
ancient	5–13	-0.09	30%	3 Sept →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	32%	3 Sept →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	35%	3 Sept →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	35%	2 Sept →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	24%	2 Sept →
cache	13–7	-0.11	24%	2 Sept →
mirage	13–7	-0.06	15%	2 Sept →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	32%	2 Sept →
anubis	12–16	-0.04	22%	2 Sept →
mirage	10–13	-0.10	26%	2 Sept →
inferno	9–0	0.32	38%	2 Sept →
mirage	13–4	-0.04	29%	2 Sept →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	24%	1 Sept →
dust2	13–8	0.01	23%	1 Sept →
ancient	13–5	-0.04	15%	1 Sept →
anubis	13–3	0.01	33%	1 Sept →
cache	14–16	-0.03	39%	1 Sept →
mirage	6–13	0.01	28%	1 Sept →
anubis	13–9	0.01	23%	31 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.03	36%	31 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.03	14%	31 Aug →
inferno	14–16	0.01	31%	31 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	42%	31 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	23%	30 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	33%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	27%	30 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.00	38%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.04	38%	28 Aug →
inferno	9–6	-0.09	36%	28 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	40%	27 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	26%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	37%	27 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	38%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.01	45%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–3	-0.04	50%	25 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	34%	25 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.01	33%	25 Aug →
mirage	0–8	-0.02	63%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.11	29%	25 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.06	29%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.01	55%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	29%	23 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	30%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.02	38%	23 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.03	25%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	20%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	29%	20 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	25%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	32%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–16	-0.04	14%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	33%	19 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	35%	19 Aug →
inferno	22–18	-0.02	22%	18 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	15%	18 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.12	24%	18 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	24%	18 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	29%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	32%	17 Aug →