wiszyzz

wiszyzz — CS2 Stats

SC76561198396055095[U:1:435789367]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

985Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#11995 of 261518 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,598 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Oct 2026 (22 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+24Tracked matches · now 985
−3.8ppWin rate · 50.0% → 46.2%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,266 +4,288 2 Sept – 23 Oct · 10 days played
21,97826,266peak 26,2662 Sept23 Oct
26,266Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,013Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-09-02

Faceit ELO

  • 415 below peak (2,013)
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 153 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGwiszyzzFACEITLevel 9 · 1,598 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,013csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning59
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–45–8Last 10047%Win rateWLWTLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · +73ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility3.7
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.9
Utility3.7
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact3.7

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time574ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 572ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy23.3%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 23.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 3 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · inferno, 12 Nov →
344msFastest reaction time · 6–1 · dust2, 3 Nov →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 9 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC197–1237%-0.00
dust2A169–756%0.01
cacheC166–1038%-0.00
anubisA116–555%0.04
vertigoC104–640%0.05
ancientC83–538%0.02
nukeA74–357%0.04
trainB63–350%0.03
infernoS54–180%0.03
office—21–150%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

212Matches
57%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
83.5ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5756%1.2817.5
Dust25157%1.3218.1
Anubis3073%1.5518.5
Ancient2665%1.1817.6
Inferno1735%1.0014.9
Nuke1050%1.1317.2
Cache850%1.5019.0
Overpass540%1.0117.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.6%Spray accuracy
67.7%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
552msReaction time
52.0%T opening success
45.3%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
9.13HE damage / grenade
5.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4225 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–40.0730%12 Nov →
inferno3–13-0.0350%12 Nov →
train13–2-0.0214%12 Nov →
vertigo12–120.1431%12 Nov →
vertigo4–130.0230%10 Nov →
dust213–90.0417%10 Nov →
cache0–2-0.010%10 Nov →
anubis13–10.0118%9 Nov →
ancient13–20.0524%9 Nov →
cache6–13-0.0615%9 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.0412%7 Nov →
cache7–13-0.0218%7 Nov →
cache7–13-0.079%6 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0726%6 Nov →
ancient5–130.0626%6 Nov →
dust212–120.0729%5 Nov →
ancient8–20.0835%5 Nov →
train8–10.1128%4 Nov →
cache13–60.1422%3 Nov →
mirage3–13-0.0637%3 Nov →
dust26–10.0730%3 Nov →
anubis6–13-0.0221%31 Oct →
office13–7-0.0227%29 Oct →
office12–120.1038%28 Oct →
cache13–30.0227%18 Oct →
dust210–130.016%18 Oct →
nuke7–130.0328%18 Oct →
ancient12–120.0122%18 Oct →
nuke5–130.0421%17 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0218%17 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0223%17 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0224%16 Oct →
nuke13–110.0514%16 Oct →
mirage5–90.0339%16 Oct →
anubis12–10.0516%15 Oct →
nuke13–90.0921%15 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0023%14 Oct →
dust212–120.0321%14 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0717%14 Oct →
mirage8–130.0126%14 Oct →
anubis13–110.0514%11 Oct →
inferno13–90.0314%11 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0032%10 Oct →
vertigo2–80.0419%10 Oct →
nuke11–130.0725%10 Oct →
vertigo13–10-0.0222%9 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0321%9 Oct →
dust213–90.0515%8 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0119%3 Oct →
dust213–110.0335%3 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.0630%3 Oct →
inferno9–10.2137%3 Oct →
mirage13–80.0126%2 Oct →
vertigo13–80.0616%2 Oct →
anubis9–130.1211%1 Oct →
cache13–60.0421%1 Oct →
mirage12–120.0922%1 Oct →
train13–80.0121%1 Oct →
cache5–130.0116%29 Sept →
anubis13–2-0.029%29 Sept →
vertigo13–100.0623%29 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0026%29 Sept →
train8–130.0526%29 Sept →
cache13–90.0517%29 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0325%28 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0823%27 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0213%27 Sept →
ancient1–8-0.060%27 Sept →
vertigo7–13-0.0430%27 Sept →
mirage13–70.0121%27 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0517%27 Sept →
anubis8–130.1026%27 Sept →
vertigo9–130.1526%27 Sept →
train3–130.0840%27 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0417%27 Sept →
ancient13–90.0821%26 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0319%26 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0332%25 Sept →
mirage13–40.0612%25 Sept →
cache13–110.0521%25 Sept →
dust213–100.0418%25 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0910%24 Sept →
mirage7–2-0.0744%24 Sept →
mirage13–70.0510%21 Sept →
anubis13–50.1418%21 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0517%20 Sept →
mirage12–120.0625%20 Sept →
cache3–13-0.119%19 Sept →
anubis13–20.1333%19 Sept →
mirage13–70.0725%19 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0222%19 Sept →
ancient5–130.0327%17 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0119%16 Sept →
cache13–60.0236%15 Sept →
vertigo13–6-0.0312%15 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0740%15 Sept →
mirage7–130.0024%14 Sept →
vertigo12–120.1040%14 Sept →
dust213–80.0821%14 Sept →
train7–13-0.0412%13 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.