Exodox

Exodox — CS2 Stats

DE76561198392851683[U:1:432585955]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,827Tracked matches64%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,309Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,310Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#71571 of 232033 tracked
FaceitLevel 2 · 669 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 20,310 → 20,310
0Faceit ELO · 669 → 669
+6Tracked matches · now 1,827
+3.6ppWin rate · 60.7% → 64.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 13 days played since 2 Sep 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,310 +2,599 3 Sept18 Sept · 9 days played
17,66920,310peak 20,3103 Sept18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 669 +0 3 Sept18 Sept · 2 observations
669669peak 6693 Sept18 Sept
20,434Peak Premier in tracked matches
669Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
13Days played since 2026-09-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 669
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 82 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,310
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,690 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,399), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate34.0%41.3%41.9%7.9% short
Shot accuracy6.5%12.6%12.2%5.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.030.950.98above
Match win rate46.2%42.5%43.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGExodoxFACEITLevel 2 · 669 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER20,310 · Pink bandPEAK ELO669csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning61
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49429Last 10049%Win rateLWLWWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · −62ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Last 20

  • 1361 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility3.5
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels5.2
Clutch5.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 70% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 70% on T to 49% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.1
Utility3.5
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels7.4
Win Impact9.8

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time533ms+34ms
first ⅓ avg 499ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–5 · italy, 9 Sept
100%Best headshot accuracy · 11–0 · train, 4 Sept
313msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · italy, 15 Sept
13–1Biggest win · shelter, 10 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
83In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

italyBest map · 100% over 6vertigoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA148657%0.03
infernoB136746%0.01
anubisS97278%0.03
vertigoD82625%0.00
dust2C73443%0.02
trainC73443%0.00
nukeS65183%0.04
italyS660100%0.08
ancientA53260%0.00
shelterC52340%0.03
mirage42250%-0.01
office41325%0.04
boulder31233%0.05
eldorado3030%0.04
fachwerk2020%0.02
overpass2020%0.02
debris2020%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

62,859Lifetime kills
1.03K/D · Top 50% of Level 2 players
3,879Matches
46.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 2 players
34.0%Headshot %
6.5%Shot accuracy
10,796MVPs
1,309Hours (in match)
2,381Bombs planted
702Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,961
AWP7,698
AUG2,673
SG 5532,364
XM10141,215
P2501,213

Lifetime map wins

6,419inferno
4,929dust2
2,587nuke
2,502vertigo
1,750office
1,175train
744italy
45lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

86Matches
51%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
94.2ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2564%1.2216.8
Mirage1638%1.1718.9
Inferno1233%1.1420.5
Nuke1267%1.0620.7
Dust21060%0.9816.3
Overpass617%0.8814.2
Anubis560%1.1817.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
40.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
68.7%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
527msReaction time
70.2%T opening success
49.0%CT opening success
0.33Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
6.09HE damage / grenade
3.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3315 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategyVertigo grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache6–13-0.0018%18 Sept
anubis13–70.0710%18 Sept
anubis6–130.0215%18 Sept
nuke16–140.0120%18 Sept
cache13–50.1232%18 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0325%18 Sept
shelter7–130.0013%17 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0515%17 Sept
cache13–90.0519%17 Sept
dust29–130.0328%17 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0620%17 Sept
mirage11–00.0329%17 Sept
cache9–130.0016%17 Sept
cache13–110.0115%16 Sept
anubis13–60.0121%16 Sept
anubis13–50.0414%16 Sept
dust213–90.1014%16 Sept
boulder12–120.0623%15 Sept
cache13–110.0516%15 Sept
italy13–11-0.0123%15 Sept
train9–130.039%15 Sept
shelter13–8-0.0117%15 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0114%15 Sept
inferno13–90.0818%15 Sept
italy13–5-0.0225%15 Sept
vertigo4–13-0.0117%15 Sept
cache12–12-0.0713%15 Sept
cache1–13-0.0520%11 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0213%11 Sept
italy13–80.0419%11 Sept
mirage10–130.0323%10 Sept
vertigo6–13-0.0223%10 Sept
inferno1–13-0.0624%10 Sept
vertigo13–9-0.0218%10 Sept
shelter13–1-0.0040%10 Sept
italy13–30.1411%10 Sept
italy13–90.0827%10 Sept
fachwerk5–13-0.0415%9 Sept
overpass10–130.0124%9 Sept
overpass9–130.0410%9 Sept
italy13–50.2519%9 Sept
vertigo13–70.0321%9 Sept
office1–13-0.0320%9 Sept
boulder2–110.0822%9 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0017%9 Sept
cache7–10.0514%9 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0527%9 Sept
vertigo2–90.0333%9 Sept
inferno9–130.0229%9 Sept
vertigo4–13-0.0455%9 Sept
debris8–8-0.0715%9 Sept
eldorado8–80.0216%9 Sept
anubis8–130.0514%7 Sept
cache13–80.1215%7 Sept
vertigo12–120.0015%7 Sept
train12–20.0341%7 Sept
office5–130.0621%7 Sept
fachwerk12–120.0926%7 Sept
dust25–130.0141%7 Sept
shelter7–130.1919%7 Sept
inferno13–100.0324%7 Sept
inferno13–70.0416%7 Sept
dust213–40.0316%7 Sept
nuke13–80.045%7 Sept
dust28–13-0.0612%7 Sept
anubis13–20.0515%7 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0414%7 Sept
eldorado6–90.0713%6 Sept
inferno6–9-0.0121%6 Sept
inferno12–120.0218%6 Sept
anubis13–30.0525%6 Sept
cache13–30.1433%6 Sept
inferno9–70.039%6 Sept
anubis13–100.0417%5 Sept
train12–120.0413%5 Sept
cache2–7-0.120%5 Sept
cache2–130.029%5 Sept
office9–130.1020%4 Sept
office13–30.0421%4 Sept
train13–20.0221%4 Sept
boulder13–30.0016%4 Sept
train7–13-0.0415%4 Sept
train1–3-0.0620%4 Sept
train11–0-0.00100%4 Sept
dust28–130.0318%4 Sept
cache13–100.027%4 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0116%4 Sept
dust213–110.0222%4 Sept
nuke13–40.0017%4 Sept
inferno5–130.0119%4 Sept
inferno13–110.0323%4 Sept
ancient10–130.0417%3 Sept
ancient13–90.0713%3 Sept
eldorado6–90.0224%3 Sept
nuke13–100.0521%3 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0512%3 Sept
vertigo5–90.039%2 Sept
debris7–90.0722%2 Sept
shelter7–13-0.0318%2 Sept
nuke13–60.1622%2 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →