Mart

Mart — CS2 Stats

76561198386919095[U:1:426653367]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,673Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,730Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,994 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,994 → 1,994
+17Tracked matches · now 1,673
−3.3ppWin rate · 40.0% → 36.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 64 days played since 23 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,761 +66 20 Feb2 Jul · 40 days played
20,00022,301peak 22,30120 Feb2 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,994 +0 1 Sept3 Sept · 2 observations
1,9941,994peak 1,9941 Sept3 Sept
22,301Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,994Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
64Days played since 2026-01-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,994
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 7 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,115), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate44.1%46.8%48.3%4.2% short
Shot accuracy10.3%13.0%13.2%3.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.031.061.070.04 short
Match win rate47.8%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMartFACEITLevel 8 · 1,994 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,994csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning44
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47521Last 10047%Win rateLWLLLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · −147ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility4.3
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.4
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time605ms−67ms
first ⅓ avg 672ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−4.9%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 15 May
35%Best headshot accuracy · 11–3 · mirage, 5 Mar
375msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 14 Aug
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 28 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
612In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8dust2Weakest map · 24% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB21111052%-0.00
dust2D1741324%-0.03
ancientB147750%-0.02
anubisB147750%0.00
infernoC125742%0.00
nukeA106460%-0.01
cacheA85363%-0.02
overpass42250%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (24% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

68,760Lifetime kills
1.03K/D
3,565Matches
47.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
44.1%Headshot %
10.3%Shot accuracy
8,391MVPs
1,574Hours (in match)
4,579Bombs planted
1,027Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4720,518
AWP4,780
FAMAS2,319
MP91,967
P901,578

Lifetime map wins

5,040inferno
3,081dust2
2,708vertigo
2,643nuke
2,476office
1,847train
424cbble
87assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

417Matches
53%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
81.4ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6760%1.2516.5
Anubis5254%1.1815.9
Inferno4553%1.2416.5
Ancient3352%0.9813.9
Dust23060%1.1516.9
Nuke2264%1.0917.4
Vertigo2060%1.1915.8
Overpass838%1.0414.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
604msReaction time
24.1%T opening success
41.3%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
9.01HE damage / grenade
4.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.0922% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

24% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–13-0.0323%17 Sept
nuke13–50.0822%8 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0215%7 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0212%21 Aug
inferno5–130.0327%18 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0215%14 Aug
ancient9–13-0.066%14 Aug
mirage0–13-0.030%14 Aug
dust211–13-0.0920%14 Aug
anubis7–13-0.046%14 Aug
cache6–130.0424%12 Aug
dust211–130.0017%12 Aug
dust21–13-0.076%12 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0010%12 Aug
mirage13–40.0522%19 Jul
nuke12–16-0.0116%19 Jul
cache13–9-0.0312%19 Jul
ancient13–40.0215%19 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0429%19 Jul
mirage13–20.0424%19 Jul
ancient13–70.0514%19 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0116%19 Jul
nuke10–130.0223%19 Jul
inferno8–13-0.029%7 Jul
anubis13–60.0220%2 Jul
dust26–5-0.064%2 Jul
overpass13–10-0.0413%1 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0224%29 Jun
dust214–16-0.0616%11 Jun
anubis16–13-0.0221%8 Jun
dust210–13-0.0428%8 Jun
cache13–11-0.0416%6 Jun
cache13–7-0.0119%31 May
anubis10–130.0220%29 May
nuke13–0-0.0218%28 May
nuke13–6-0.0114%26 May
dust27–13-0.0423%25 May
ancient10–13-0.0911%25 May
ancient7–130.0022%20 May
dust213–60.0213%19 May
nuke13–10-0.0612%19 May
mirage13–60.0216%18 May
mirage11–13-0.089%18 May
mirage13–9-0.0325%16 May
inferno13–50.1222%15 May
mirage13–6-0.059%14 May
overpass5–13-0.0326%12 May
cache5–13-0.059%8 May
cache13–9-0.0415%30 Apr
cache12–12-0.0212%30 Apr
nuke13–3-0.0213%30 Apr
cache13–8-0.0122%29 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0014%23 Apr
anubis13–110.0225%17 Apr
mirage9–130.0720%16 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0418%9 Apr
dust213–70.1021%8 Apr
ancient13–4-0.0719%7 Apr
dust210–13-0.0317%2 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0319%1 Apr
anubis16–130.0419%31 Mar
overpass5–13-0.0714%27 Mar
dust213–16-0.0321%26 Mar
nuke16–13-0.0321%26 Mar
ancient13–50.0219%23 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0016%20 Mar
dust213–4-0.0218%20 Mar
mirage12–160.1020%20 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0119%19 Mar
mirage13–100.0317%19 Mar
mirage5–130.0116%19 Mar
inferno13–110.0320%18 Mar
mirage14–16-0.0415%17 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0421%16 Mar
ancient13–16-0.0728%16 Mar
anubis11–130.0016%16 Mar
ancient16–14-0.0724%12 Mar
dust29–13-0.0022%11 Mar
anubis13–50.0331%6 Mar
mirage11–30.0435%5 Mar
dust213–30.0424%2 Mar
anubis11–130.0127%1 Mar
ancient13–100.0120%1 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0224%28 Feb
dust21–13-0.0621%28 Feb
mirage13–90.0114%28 Feb
inferno13–110.0017%27 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0228%26 Feb
mirage13–110.0128%20 Feb
nuke14–16-0.0327%16 Feb
dust26–13-0.0510%16 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0127%12 Feb
overpass13–20.0411%12 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0927%10 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0112%10 Feb
dust24–13-0.0633%9 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0524%6 Feb
anubis13–70.0520%29 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0419%23 Jan
anubis13–50.0711%23 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →