styxx

styxx — CS2 Stats

US76561198385473258[U:1:425207530]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,726Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,007Top 50% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#54281 of 252168 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,642 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,007 +482 3 Sept – 10 Oct · 7 days played
21,25522,124peak 22,1243 Sept10 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,642 +0 1 Sept – 20 Sept · 3 observations
1,6421,642peak 1,6421 Sept20 Sept
22,124Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,642Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-07-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,642
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 109 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 117 below peak (22,124)
  • +700 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,993 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-20
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGstyxxFACEITLevel 10 · 1,642 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER22,007 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,642csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning64
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–48–1Last 10051%Win rateLWWWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −4.3pp headshot accuracy · +14ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility5.8
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.4
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact5.6

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time534ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 534ms
Headshot accuracy28.8%+3.2%
first ⅓ avg 25.6% → last ⅓ avg 28.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 28 Jul →
53%Best headshot accuracy · 1–8 · cache, 22 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · inferno, 26 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 13 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 8nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2917–1259%0.04
dust2B2210–1245%0.02
ancientB158–753%0.00
cacheB105–550%0.01
anubisA85–363%-0.01
infernoC83–538%0.01
nukeD72–529%-0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

768Matches
52%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
80.1ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19254%1.2317.2
Ancient13149%1.1016.1
Dust27145%1.1116.6
Anubis6458%1.1415.8
Inferno6351%1.1514.8
Nuke4448%1.0816.6
Overpass2756%1.3517.2
Vertigo2462%1.1618.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.7%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
542msReaction time
56.8%T opening success
47.5%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
12.36HE damage / grenade
5.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0537%16 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0117%15 Oct →
cache13–50.0319%15 Oct →
dust213–20.1540%13 Oct →
cache10–130.1032%10 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0731%9 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0218%9 Oct →
ancient11–130.0318%8 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0327%7 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0228%7 Oct →
ancient13–30.0620%6 Oct →
mirage13–110.0241%3 Oct →
anubis13–4-0.0020%1 Oct →
mirage13–90.0233%29 Sept →
mirage3–130.0331%23 Sept →
nuke15–150.0242%18 Sept →
mirage11–130.0836%15 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0426%15 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0121%11 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0840%5 Sept →
ancient6–130.0240%5 Sept →
dust213–60.0230%4 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0336%4 Sept →
ancient13–100.0431%3 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0533%2 Sept →
nuke14–160.0232%1 Sept →
mirage13–90.0720%31 Aug →
dust215–190.0526%31 Aug →
mirage13–100.0725%30 Aug →
anubis13–80.0230%30 Aug →
mirage13–110.0521%28 Aug →
ancient13–90.0831%28 Aug →
ancient11–130.0218%28 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.012%26 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0426%26 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0319%26 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0135%25 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0313%25 Aug →
inferno4–130.0326%24 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0232%22 Aug →
cache1–80.0153%22 Aug →
dust216–130.0532%21 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0314%21 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0431%21 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0018%20 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0225%20 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0223%20 Aug →
inferno13–70.0525%20 Aug →
mirage13–100.0920%19 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0115%19 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0213%19 Aug →
vertigo13–100.0232%19 Aug →
dust213–90.0216%17 Aug →
mirage16–140.0820%17 Aug →
anubis16–130.0118%17 Aug →
mirage16–120.0431%17 Aug →
mirage13–80.0732%17 Aug →
cache19–22-0.0221%17 Aug →
mirage14–160.0420%17 Aug →
cache13–100.0422%16 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0744%16 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0119%16 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0314%16 Aug →
mirage19–160.0718%15 Aug →
dust213–100.0229%15 Aug →
dust210–130.0747%15 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0124%14 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0012%14 Aug →
dust27–130.0320%13 Aug →
mirage13–110.0625%13 Aug →
cache13–70.0512%13 Aug →
dust210–130.0035%12 Aug →
mirage7–130.0322%12 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0623%12 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0024%11 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0633%11 Aug →
ancient10–130.0713%10 Aug →
mirage6–130.0125%10 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0838%6 Aug →
mirage13–160.0128%6 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0434%5 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0124%4 Aug →
mirage13–80.0932%3 Aug →
dust211–130.0830%3 Aug →
ancient16–130.0129%31 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0526%31 Jul →
nuke13–60.0230%31 Jul →
mirage13–110.0636%29 Jul →
nuke13–80.0122%29 Jul →
mirage11–130.0121%28 Jul →
inferno9–30.1621%28 Jul →
mirage16–140.0621%27 Jul →
mirage13–160.0429%27 Jul →
mirage13–100.1134%26 Jul →
dust210–130.0024%26 Jul →
dust213–100.0322%26 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0814%26 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0522%25 Jul →
dust210–130.0129%25 Jul →
dust213–80.0634%24 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.