โ˜†๐“™๐“ธ๐“ป๐“น๐“ฎ๐“ต๐“ช

โ˜†๐“™๐“ธ๐“ป๐“น๐“ฎ๐“ต๐“ช โ€” CS2 Stats

76561198380037416[U:1:419771688]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

1,598Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,086Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating18,614Purple band ยท top ~14% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#94357 of 233157 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 13 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking โ†’

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,614 +366 13 Mar โ€“ 18 Sept ยท 28 days played
14,11919,018peak 19,01813 Mar18 Sept
19,018Peak Premier in tracked matches
47Days played since 2026-03-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 404 below peak (19,018)
  • -67 over 30 days ยท steady
  • +3,955 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 โ€” 1,386 to go
  • Reached: Purple band ยท Blue band ยท Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,847), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate43.2%42.7%43.8%meets
Shot accuracy14.5%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.130.991.02above
Match win rate42.3%43.9%44.7%2.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGโ˜†๐“™๐“ธ๐“ป๐“น๐“ฎ๐“ต๐“ชFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER18,614 ยท Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning52
Utility58

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY38โ€“54โ€“8Last 10038%Win rateWLWWWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate ยท +0.01 avg rating ยท +0.5pp headshot accuracy ยท โˆ’41ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” more than a 10-match window's normal noise (ยฑ20pp).

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4โ€“1 ยท 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 10

  • 6โ€“4 ยท 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 20

  • 9โ€“9โ€“2 ยท 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist โ€” Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility5.8
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch7.6

Reliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 30% on T โ€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 623ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning5.2
Utility5.8
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact3.7

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01โˆ’0.02
first โ…“ avg 0.01 โ†’ last โ…“ avg -0.01
Reaction time625msโˆ’1ms
first โ…“ avg 626ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 625ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%โˆ’0.0%
first โ…“ avg 18.1% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating ยท 14โ€“16 ยท mirage, 18 Mar โ†’
33%Best headshot accuracy ยท 13โ€“10 ยท anubis, 8 Sept โ†’
461msFastest reaction time ยท 7โ€“13 ยท nuke, 24 Mar โ†’
13โ€“2Biggest win ยท inferno, 19 Aug โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
2โ€“8In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map ยท 55% over 20dust2Weakest map ยท 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD227โ€“1532%-0.01
mirageA2011โ€“955%0.01
nukeC176โ€“1135%-0.01
cacheB136โ€“746%-0.02
ancientC94โ€“544%-0.02
dust2D61โ€“517%-0.04
anubisC52โ€“340%0.02
overpassD51โ€“420%-0.01
vertigoโ€”20โ€“20%-0.01
officeโ€”10โ€“10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

173,062Lifetime kills
1.13K/D ยท Top 25% of Level 4 players
7,594Matches
42.3%Match win rate
43.2%Headshot % ยท Top 50% of Level 4 players
14.5%Shot accuracy ยท Top 50% of Level 4 players
17,044MVPs
3,086Hours (in match)
5,454Bombs planted
1,247Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4752,376
AWP20,639
Molotov11,427
MP96,080
SSG 083,541
MAC-103,103

Lifetime map wins

15,300inferno
7,796nuke
5,133dust2
2,581train
1,333cbble
1,212vertigo
447office
284lake

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

162Matches
50%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
85.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

58%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2948%1.0018.2
Inferno1759%1.0315.4
Nuke862%1.1214.6
Dust22100%1.6218.0
Ancient250%0.729.5
Anubis10%0.7115.0
Vertigo1100%1.2327.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
71.9%Counter-strafing
8.3ยฐPreaim
623msReaction time
29.7%T opening success
46.0%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
13.33HE damage / grenade
6.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4456 โ€” below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups โ†’
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.6971% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy โ†’Dust 2 grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13โ€“60.0418%18 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“16-0.019%18 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“8-0.0511%16 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“90.0514%9 Sept โ†’
mirage16โ€“13-0.0217%9 Sept โ†’
nuke11โ€“130.0823%9 Sept โ†’
nuke11โ€“13-0.0223%8 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“100.0433%8 Sept โ†’
dust27โ€“13-0.0817%20 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“2-0.0517%19 Aug โ†’
dust21โ€“13-0.0424%19 Aug โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0120%18 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“90.0420%18 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“90.0125%18 Aug โ†’
inferno4โ€“13-0.0613%18 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“50.1017%2 Aug โ†’
dust210โ€“13-0.0313%2 Aug โ†’
inferno15โ€“15-0.0116%31 Jul โ†’
dust215โ€“15-0.0811%29 Jul โ†’
inferno10โ€“13-0.0218%24 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“70.0119%24 Jul โ†’
ancient6โ€“13-0.0620%24 Jul โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0617%16 Jul โ†’
cache15โ€“15-0.0211%15 Jul โ†’
inferno8โ€“130.0120%15 Jul โ†’
inferno11โ€“13-0.0418%8 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“9-0.0019%6 Jul โ†’
mirage15โ€“15-0.0123%6 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.0828%6 Jul โ†’
inferno9โ€“13-0.0216%6 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“80.0119%6 Jul โ†’
inferno6โ€“130.0114%4 Jul โ†’
ancient3โ€“13-0.0715%3 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“10-0.0219%3 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“20.0820%3 Jul โ†’
inferno11โ€“13-0.0114%30 Jun โ†’
overpass7โ€“13-0.0325%30 Jun โ†’
cache8โ€“13-0.0624%5 Jun โ†’
vertigo1โ€“130.0124%5 Jun โ†’
ancient13โ€“8-0.0016%9 May โ†’
nuke10โ€“13-0.087%8 May โ†’
cache13โ€“80.0621%8 May โ†’
cache13โ€“70.0314%8 May โ†’
mirage8โ€“13-0.0111%8 May โ†’
cache4โ€“13-0.0317%30 Apr โ†’
cache13โ€“90.0130%30 Apr โ†’
cache12โ€“12-0.1016%30 Apr โ†’
cache13โ€“110.0032%29 Apr โ†’
cache11โ€“13-0.0232%29 Apr โ†’
cache12โ€“12-0.0922%29 Apr โ†’
cache11โ€“13-0.0221%29 Apr โ†’
inferno13โ€“9-0.0514%27 Apr โ†’
nuke2โ€“13-0.089%27 Apr โ†’
nuke13โ€“7-0.0820%22 Apr โ†’
inferno3โ€“13-0.0117%21 Apr โ†’
mirage13โ€“8-0.0524%19 Apr โ†’
nuke10โ€“13-0.0129%15 Apr โ†’
inferno13โ€“6-0.0222%15 Apr โ†’
overpass5โ€“130.0129%15 Apr โ†’
mirage11โ€“13-0.0021%14 Apr โ†’
ancient2โ€“13-0.0323%14 Apr โ†’
vertigo9โ€“13-0.0219%13 Apr โ†’
office12โ€“120.0123%13 Apr โ†’
dust27โ€“130.0427%8 Apr โ†’
nuke10โ€“13-0.0232%8 Apr โ†’
inferno13โ€“4-0.037%7 Apr โ†’
mirage13โ€“20.0326%7 Apr โ†’
ancient13โ€“40.0122%7 Apr โ†’
mirage13โ€“80.0224%6 Apr โ†’
inferno10โ€“130.0421%6 Apr โ†’
overpass7โ€“13-0.079%1 Apr โ†’
inferno4โ€“13-0.1018%1 Apr โ†’
mirage6โ€“130.0425%31 Mar โ†’
inferno10โ€“130.0127%31 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“8-0.0222%28 Mar โ†’
ancient3โ€“13-0.0517%28 Mar โ†’
anubis4โ€“13-0.0314%28 Mar โ†’
overpass15โ€“150.0115%26 Mar โ†’
anubis13โ€“20.1130%26 Mar โ†’
nuke13โ€“6-0.0318%26 Mar โ†’
mirage4โ€“13-0.0914%25 Mar โ†’
nuke10โ€“130.0119%25 Mar โ†’
nuke7โ€“13-0.0614%24 Mar โ†’
inferno8โ€“130.1419%23 Mar โ†’
inferno3โ€“13-0.0710%23 Mar โ†’
anubis7โ€“130.0120%23 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“11-0.0016%22 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0726%21 Mar โ†’
nuke9โ€“130.0414%21 Mar โ†’
ancient13โ€“70.0215%20 Mar โ†’
nuke13โ€“40.0019%20 Mar โ†’
anubis5โ€“13-0.0411%20 Mar โ†’
inferno5โ€“130.0113%20 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0424%20 Mar โ†’
mirage14โ€“160.1427%18 Mar โ†’
overpass13โ€“60.0113%18 Mar โ†’
mirage10โ€“130.0318%17 Mar โ†’
ancient2โ€“130.0122%16 Mar โ†’
nuke13โ€“100.0213%16 Mar โ†’
nuke13โ€“16-0.0112%13 Mar โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’