GlooM — CS2 Stats

76561198378303963[U:1:418038235]✓ No bans

1,748Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since

5,463Hours in CS41Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,621Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2379 of 12683 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,406 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	53.9%	52.8%
Shot accuracy	14.6%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.13	1.08
Match win rate	51.5%	49.2%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91

Positioning56

Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–45–2Last 10053%Win rateLWWWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.1

Aggression7.7

Utility6.2

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels3.0

Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1

Positioning5.6

Utility6.2

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels3.0

Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time489ms−33ms

first ⅓ avg 522ms → last ⅓ avg 489ms

Headshot accuracy23.4%+3.0%

first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — inferno 9–1

13–1Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

10–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 38% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	26	11–15	42%	0.01
ancient	A	14	9–5	64%	0.03
cache	B	14	7–7	50%	0.03
inferno	S	13	9–4	69%	0.04
anubis	C	13	5–8	38%	0.01
nuke	A	11	7–4	64%	0.03
dust2	S	6	5–1	83%	0.01
office	—	3	0–3	0%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

119,694Lifetime kills

1.13K/D · Top 50% of Level 10 players

4,072Matches

51.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players

53.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players

14.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players

11,410MVPs

2,748Hours (in match)

5,467Bombs planted

1,414Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4756,270

M4A4 / M4A1-S23,371

P2000 / USP-S7,271

AWP6,627

Glock-185,651

Desert Eagle3,019

AUG2,307

Knife2,251

SG 5531,682

Galil AR1,663

Lifetime map wins

5,112inferno

4,472nuke

4,354dust2

2,460train

2,145vertigo

152cbble

33office

13italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,829Matches

54%Win rate

1.15Avg K/D

83.4ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	327	59%	1.21	17.4
Ancient	156	51%	1.17	16.9
Anubis	130	52%	1.19	17.1
Nuke	129	60%	1.19	17.4
Dust2	78	44%	1.13	15.9
Inferno	60	53%	1.18	17.8
Overpass	54	61%	1.26	17.0
Cache	41	59%	1.31	18.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy

39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.7%Spray accuracy

82.8%Counter-strafing

10.0°Preaim

494msReaction time

32.1%T opening success

52.2%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

6.5%Flash assists

7.67HE damage / grenade

9.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.0988% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	5–13	-0.06	50%	23 Aug →
ancient	16–14	-0.01	18%	23 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.02	22%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.04	20%	21 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.00	28%	6 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.01	24%	5 Aug →
cache	2–13	0.00	24%	5 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.03	13%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.04	10%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.04	14%	3 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.04	26%	2 Aug →
inferno	3–1	-0.05	13%	2 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.08	24%	30 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.06	32%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.02	31%	29 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.03	28%	29 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.03	30%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.06	21%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.04	27%	24 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.06	41%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.04	28%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.02	18%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.02	16%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	13%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.08	36%	21 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	15%	20 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.02	0%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	27%	19 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.01	20%	19 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.03	49%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	22%	19 Jul →
nuke	1–13	-0.11	6%	17 Jul →
anubis	14–16	-0.01	27%	16 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.10	24%	14 Jul →
office	4–13	0.01	26%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.07	17%	13 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.10	25%	13 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.05	29%	13 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.02	35%	13 Jul →
office	12–12	0.13	30%	13 Jul →
office	2–13	-0.00	30%	12 Jul →
mirage	1–7	0.01	13%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.03	23%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.03	32%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.06	29%	11 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.16	25%	11 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	14%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.07	32%	11 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.05	46%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.10	26%	10 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	35%	26 Jun →
dust2	16–12	0.06	25%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.02	18%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–1	-0.02	8%	19 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.09	21%	17 Jun →
nuke	13–4	0.06	17%	9 Jun →
cache	10–13	0.07	25%	1 Jun →
inferno	9–13	0.03	12%	1 Jun →
ancient	6–13	0.02	30%	31 May →
mirage	8–13	0.03	30%	30 May →
ancient	4–13	-0.00	21%	29 May →
ancient	10–13	0.07	22%	23 May →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	12%	22 May →
cache	13–8	-0.01	23%	12 May →
inferno	9–4	-0.02	29%	12 May →
mirage	6–13	0.02	29%	11 May →
cache	6–13	-0.04	15%	10 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	26%	4 May →
inferno	13–9	0.12	23%	30 Apr →
nuke	7–13	0.03	25%	29 Apr →
nuke	11–13	0.05	18%	28 Apr →
dust2	13–8	-0.00	29%	27 Apr →
anubis	9–13	0.01	16%	25 Apr →
mirage	9–13	0.01	20%	23 Apr →
ancient	13–9	0.10	14%	22 Apr →
ancient	13–11	0.01	31%	21 Apr →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	30%	21 Apr →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	25%	19 Apr →
anubis	6–13	0.02	35%	16 Apr →
inferno	9–1	0.19	16%	13 Apr →
nuke	9–3	0.15	21%	13 Apr →
mirage	13–6	0.01	10%	11 Apr →
nuke	16–13	0.01	15%	6 Apr →
nuke	5–13	-0.07	15%	6 Apr →
anubis	13–10	0.05	29%	5 Apr →
mirage	1–13	-0.01	3%	4 Apr →
dust2	13–11	0.02	14%	2 Apr →
anubis	13–8	0.02	15%	2 Apr →
ancient	13–4	0.10	15%	24 Mar →
nuke	13–10	0.03	36%	24 Mar →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	10%	23 Mar →
mirage	12–16	-0.06	24%	19 Mar →
anubis	11–13	0.07	18%	17 Mar →
ancient	13–4	0.04	23%	17 Mar →
nuke	13–6	0.02	21%	17 Mar →
ancient	13–5	0.01	27%	14 Mar →
inferno	13–9	0.04	14%	14 Mar →
mirage	4–13	0.06	15%	13 Mar →
inferno	13–8	-0.04	21%	12 Mar →
dust2	13–10	0.07	22%	12 Mar →