Gateris

Gateris — CS2 Stats

LV76561198376553475[U:1:416287747]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

707Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,619Hours in CS35Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,053Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#85151 of 220809 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,981 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 19,053 → 19,053
0Faceit ELO · 1,981 → 1,981
+1Tracked matches · now 707
0.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 51 days played since 3 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,053 -2,423 3 Jan16 Sept · 26 days played
14,08022,350peak 22,3503 Jan16 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,981 +0 15 Sept16 Sept · 2 observations
1,9811,981peak 1,98115 Sept16 Sept
22,551Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,981Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-01-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,981
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 20 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,297 below peak (22,350)
  • +1,409 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 947 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate43.8%48.3%51.0%7.2% short
Shot accuracy15.2%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.201.071.09above
Match win rate52.1%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGaterisFACEITLevel 9 · 1,981 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER19,053 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,981csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning52
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD4951Last 10049%Win rateLWLLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · −28ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility6.3
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.2
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time586ms−70ms
first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy15.0%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 26 Jul
44%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · mirage, 2 Feb
430msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · inferno, 26 Jul
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 14 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
94In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 59% over 17infernoWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB37172046%0.00
dust2A1710759%-0.00
ancientA116555%0.02
nukeB105550%0.00
cacheA74357%-0.02
anubisC73443%-0.01
infernoD6060%-0.03
vertigo1010%0.06
shelter110100%0.06
boulder110100%0.12
overpass110100%0.07
train110100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

52,194Lifetime kills
1.20K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
2,326Matches
52.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
43.8%Headshot %
15.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
7,674MVPs
901Hours (in match)
1,976Bombs planted
647Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

9,781dust2
2,401office
1,898inferno
928nuke
523vertigo
315train
125cbble
37lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

321Matches
55%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
84.4ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10350%1.1316.8
Dust25463%1.4018.8
Ancient3754%1.2317.3
Anubis2662%1.3816.6
Nuke2264%1.2317.4
Inferno1520%0.8913.1
Cache922%0.9514.1
Vertigo757%0.9918.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
79.7%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
570msReaction time
28.6%T opening success
48.4%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
9.54HE damage / grenade
8.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.5899% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache5–13-0.0714%14 Sept
ancient13–80.0522%14 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0721%11 Sept
mirage13–160.0418%9 Sept
mirage13–110.0311%7 Sept
mirage5–130.0116%6 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0623%6 Sept
cache13–10-0.0415%6 Sept
ancient11–130.0111%5 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0215%2 Sept
mirage3–130.0518%2 Sept
ancient13–60.117%29 Aug
ancient13–90.0411%29 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0010%26 Aug
dust213–70.0017%26 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0015%26 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0318%21 Aug
cache13–70.0618%21 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0210%18 Aug
dust211–130.0226%17 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0029%15 Aug
mirage13–80.0213%13 Aug
mirage13–100.0118%13 Aug
anubis16–120.0116%11 Aug
anubis13–20.079%11 Aug
dust26–13-0.0315%11 Aug
ancient13–60.0310%11 Aug
dust213–7-0.007%11 Aug
dust28–13-0.058%9 Aug
vertigo12–160.0611%8 Aug
nuke10–130.0416%8 Aug
cache7–2-0.0814%2 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0315%31 Jul
mirage10–130.0426%31 Jul
ancient13–50.1217%28 Jul
dust213–110.0519%28 Jul
mirage13–110.0111%28 Jul
mirage13–40.0619%28 Jul
mirage16–130.0614%26 Jul
cache16–140.0215%26 Jul
anubis13–30.1326%26 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0612%26 Jul
anubis0–13-0.070%23 Jul
mirage9–130.0727%23 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0211%20 Jul
mirage13–40.0321%13 Jul
mirage13–90.0415%13 Jul
shelter13–100.0618%12 Jul
boulder13–70.1224%12 Jul
cache5–130.0115%12 Jul
dust213–9-0.0916%6 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0324%5 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0518%5 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0920%18 May
cache10–13-0.0614%28 Apr
dust27–13-0.0119%18 Apr
dust213–9-0.0022%26 Feb
mirage9–13-0.068%23 Feb
mirage1–13-0.0413%21 Feb
inferno7–130.0016%21 Feb
overpass13–60.0714%21 Feb
ancient11–130.0428%21 Feb
mirage16–14-0.0312%21 Feb
mirage9–130.0321%16 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0911%16 Feb
dust28–13-0.0217%10 Feb
ancient13–4-0.1026%10 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0417%9 Feb
nuke13–60.0123%9 Feb
mirage1–13-0.0844%2 Feb
mirage16–140.0322%2 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0314%30 Jan
anubis3–13-0.0910%26 Jan
mirage13–60.0527%25 Jan
mirage13–4-0.0710%24 Jan
mirage11–130.0118%24 Jan
anubis6–13-0.1113%24 Jan
mirage13–40.0315%18 Jan
dust213–11-0.0426%16 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0112%16 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0227%15 Jan
mirage13–100.0416%15 Jan
nuke13–60.0417%15 Jan
inferno1–100.0014%14 Jan
nuke10–130.0113%14 Jan
dust213–110.0226%14 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0417%14 Jan
dust213–00.0418%14 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0215%13 Jan
nuke13–50.0414%13 Jan
dust210–13-0.0517%13 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0415%12 Jan
mirage13–50.0614%12 Jan
dust213–8-0.0116%11 Jan
nuke12–16-0.0318%11 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0413%7 Jan
train13–4-0.0619%7 Jan
dust213–60.0617%6 Jan
mirage13–40.0722%6 Jan
dust210–130.0312%3 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →