Czekalski

Czekalski — CS2 Stats

CH76561198365372281[U:1:405106553]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,100Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating13,980Blue band · top ~33.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,252 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,980 +1,705 2 Aug – 2 Oct · 28 days played
9,84714,999peak 14,9992 Aug2 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,252 +0 30 Aug – 31 Aug · 2 observations
1,2521,252peak 1,25230 Aug31 Aug
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,252Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-08-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,252
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 99 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,019 below peak (14,999)
  • +317 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,020 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCzekalskiFACEITLevel 4 · 1,252 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER13,980 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,252csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning48
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–49–5Last 10046%Win rateWWWLLWLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +5.3pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility5.4
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.8
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time544ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 557ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 5–1 · rush_001, 1 Oct →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 0–4 · rush_001, 1 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · vertigo, 11 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · vertigo, 23 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
8–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 17% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2113–862%-0.01
nukeB147–750%0.02
dust2C135–838%-0.01
infernoD122–1017%-0.01
vertigoB126–650%0.02
ancientC114–736%0.01
cacheS86–275%0.02
rush_001C52–340%0.02
anubis—41–325%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

238Matches
48%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
78.7ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5450%1.0113.4
Ancient4452%1.1114.4
Inferno4450%1.1016.1
Nuke3345%1.1714.9
Dust21729%0.9714.7
Overpass1759%1.0614.8
Anubis1030%0.9814.9
Cache956%1.1417.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
74.1%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
543msReaction time
37.2%T opening success
55.4%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
6.59HE damage / grenade
9.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.2089% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–30.0726%2 Oct →
rush_0015–10.2024%1 Oct →
rush_0015–10.1830%1 Oct →
rush_0010–4-0.1340%1 Oct →
rush_0014–8-0.0720%1 Oct →
ancient13–20.1311%30 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0213%30 Sept →
mirage13–90.0321%30 Sept →
rush_0015–8-0.0633%30 Sept →
inferno15–150.0613%19 Sept →
nuke16–130.0421%16 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0237%15 Sept →
ancient13–100.0614%15 Sept →
nuke14–160.0414%15 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0419%15 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0510%14 Sept →
mirage13–80.0117%14 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.1119%10 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0320%10 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.066%10 Sept →
cache8–130.0123%9 Sept →
dust213–50.0222%9 Sept →
mirage13–110.0223%8 Sept →
vertigo8–13-0.0319%8 Sept →
mirage13–110.0321%8 Sept →
dust213–7-0.037%8 Sept →
dust216–130.0226%7 Sept →
mirage13–90.0223%7 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0613%4 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0724%3 Sept →
ancient9–130.0119%3 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0513%3 Sept →
cache8–13-0.017%2 Sept →
mirage13–80.0320%1 Sept →
inferno13–70.0217%1 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0110%1 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0320%1 Sept →
mirage13–60.0120%1 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0415%31 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0311%31 Aug →
cache16–14-0.0110%31 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0110%30 Aug →
dust29–130.0019%30 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0114%30 Aug →
nuke5–70.0025%30 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0714%29 Aug →
inferno26–280.019%29 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0516%29 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0319%29 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0411%26 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0324%26 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0416%25 Aug →
inferno15–150.0320%25 Aug →
vertigo13–10.029%23 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0211%23 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.1018%21 Aug →
nuke13–60.0723%21 Aug →
ancient13–70.0424%21 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0312%20 Aug →
cache13–70.0013%20 Aug →
ancient13–110.009%19 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0118%19 Aug →
nuke13–60.0815%19 Aug →
vertigo12–12-0.0521%18 Aug →
mirage11–130.0116%18 Aug →
cache13–70.0123%18 Aug →
nuke12–12-0.0120%18 Aug →
vertigo13–110.0115%17 Aug →
vertigo13–70.0112%17 Aug →
vertigo8–130.0111%17 Aug →
vertigo13–30.0017%17 Aug →
vertigo8–130.0118%17 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.029%16 Aug →
cache13–90.0518%16 Aug →
nuke13–90.1226%16 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0318%16 Aug →
dust23–13-0.104%16 Aug →
mirage13–90.0816%16 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0217%15 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.019%15 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0222%12 Aug →
nuke13–20.0426%12 Aug →
anubis13–40.014%12 Aug →
vertigo13–80.0815%12 Aug →
vertigo11–13-0.0223%11 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.1321%8 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0315%8 Aug →
dust211–130.0414%7 Aug →
inferno11–130.0417%7 Aug →
cache13–60.0725%7 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.0616%7 Aug →
nuke13–30.0521%7 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0013%5 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0212%5 Aug →
vertigo13–70.0923%4 Aug →
dust213–90.0427%2 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.038%2 Aug →
mirage6–130.0612%2 Aug →
cache13–40.0422%2 Aug →
ancient3–130.0111%2 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.