Sv.- — CS2 Stats

76561198365276681[U:1:405010953]

115Tracked matches55%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,529Blue band · top ~30.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8749 of 13172 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

14,529Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 14,529
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 471 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSv.-FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,529 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning43
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54424Last 10054%Win rateLLWWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2
Aggression5.2
Utility3.6
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch1.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 682ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.3
Utility3.6
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time681ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 708ms → last ⅓ avg 681ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 24.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — overpass 9–4
131Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
74In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 8dust2Weakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA2314961%0.00
mirageC1771041%-0.01
ancientA169756%0.01
infernoC146843%-0.01
anubisS139469%-0.00
nukeS86275%0.02
dust2D71614%-0.03
overpass110100%0.22
train110100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

32Matches
56%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
68.4ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient875%1.0515.1
Mirage633%1.0014.3
Cache5100%1.1914.6
Dust250%0.7812.2
Inferno367%0.6711.0
Anubis367%1.7813.7
Nuke250%0.8615.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
682msReaction time
29.6%T opening success
37.6%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
8.61HE damage / grenade
2.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.354 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.5652% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–130.0724%11 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0619%11 Aug
anubis13–7-0.089%11 Aug
ancient11–30.1439%11 Aug
cache3–130.0134%11 Aug
anubis2–13-0.1026%7 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0617%7 Aug
cache2–13-0.1014%7 Aug
ancient16–14-0.059%7 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0513%6 Aug
cache11–130.0122%1 Aug
inferno10–6-0.0327%1 Aug
cache13–3-0.0120%1 Aug
anubis13–60.0110%30 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0129%30 Jul
ancient5–13-0.1010%30 Jul
nuke9–40.0637%30 Jul
nuke9–40.1820%30 Jul
overpass9–40.2214%30 Jul
cache13–90.0132%30 Jul
nuke12–12-0.0129%29 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0516%29 Jul
anubis8–130.0122%29 Jul
anubis13–100.0117%22 Jul
nuke13–60.0317%21 Jul
cache13–80.0233%18 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0123%18 Jul
mirage3–13-0.1020%16 Jul
anubis13–40.028%16 Jul
anubis13–110.0420%16 Jul
ancient11–130.0027%15 Jul
cache13–60.0118%13 Jul
inferno13–110.0023%12 Jul
mirage9–130.0826%12 Jul
cache13–90.0132%12 Jul
cache13–60.0328%11 Jul
cache13–5-0.0416%11 Jul
nuke7–13-0.1216%11 Jul
anubis3–20.0827%11 Jul
nuke16–120.0422%11 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0224%11 Jul
mirage13–90.0423%11 Jul
ancient2–130.0319%11 Jul
mirage13–50.0723%11 Jul
anubis13–30.0723%10 Jul
cache13–60.0523%9 Jul
mirage12–120.0730%9 Jul
ancient9–130.0421%9 Jul
inferno13–90.0822%9 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0118%9 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0126%9 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0625%8 Jul
cache6–13-0.0224%7 Jul
mirage5–13-0.097%7 Jul
dust26–13-0.0419%7 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0026%6 Jul
cache13–4-0.0130%6 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0429%6 Jul
cache5–13-0.0422%6 Jul
cache2–130.0329%6 Jul
cache13–10.0525%6 Jul
ancient13–50.0322%6 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0035%6 Jul
cache13–110.0222%6 Jul
anubis13–20.1033%6 Jul
ancient16–12-0.0419%5 Jul
dust212–16-0.0526%5 Jul
cache13–80.0122%5 Jul
cache9–3-0.0027%4 Jul
mirage13–80.0423%4 Jul
inferno5–9-0.0125%4 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0017%4 Jul
dust212–12-0.0325%3 Jul
dust25–13-0.0239%2 Jul
inferno13–8-0.029%2 Jul
cache3–13-0.0321%2 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0124%1 Jul
inferno6–130.0430%1 Jul
cache5–13-0.0541%1 Jul
ancient13–100.0619%1 Jul
cache13–10.1529%1 Jul
dust213–80.0632%28 Jun
ancient13–110.0218%28 Jun
cache10–13-0.0627%27 Jun
anubis13–10-0.1111%27 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0425%27 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0228%24 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0519%24 Jun
ancient12–120.0126%24 Jun
ancient2–0-0.110%24 Jun
dust24–13-0.0329%24 Jun
inferno5–130.0940%22 Jun
ancient4–130.0017%22 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0221%22 Jun
train13–7-0.0021%17 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0632%6 Jun
ancient13–80.0340%6 Jun
mirage13–30.0018%2 Jun
dust25–13-0.0924%2 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0623%2 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →