Ervis

Ervis — CS2 Stats

GB76561198365011682[U:1:404745954]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

486Tracked matches31%Win rate2022Tracked since
284Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.8 LearningClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating17,783Purple band · top ~17.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 486 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 19 days played since 28 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,783 -1,919 8 May10 Sept · 10 days played
17,54319,702peak 19,7028 May10 Sept
19,702Peak Premier in tracked matches
19Days played since 2026-04-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,919 below peak (19,702)
  • 0 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,217 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,862), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate43.5%41.9%42.7%meets
Shot accuracy11.6%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.010.981.00meets
Match win rate47.8%43.3%43.9%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 4 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGErvisFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER17,783 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning43
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD37576Last 10037%Win rateTLLLLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · +164ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 041 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 761ms

Last 10

  • 181 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 756ms

Last 20

  • 4142 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 674ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility2.4
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch4.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning4.3
Utility2.4
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time639ms−72ms
first ⅓ avg 711ms → last ⅓ avg 639ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 3–10 · dust2, 19 May
44%Best headshot accuracy · 1–10 · cache, 2 Jun
406msFastest reaction time · 7–9 · inferno, 20 May
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 7 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 54% over 13italyWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC26111542%-0.03
nukeB1991047%-0.01
mirageB137654%-0.03
cacheD103730%-0.04
dust2D81713%-0.04
italyD5050%-0.03
alpine42250%-0.04
overpass42250%-0.03
vertigo3030%-0.03
anubis21150%-0.04
ancient21150%-0.01
train1010%-0.01
stronghold1010%-0.11
office1010%-0.01
poseidon1010%-0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

14,736Lifetime kills
1.01K/D · Top 50% of Level 3 players
892Matches
47.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 3 players
43.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
11.6%Shot accuracy
1,741MVPs
284Hours (in match)
797Bombs planted
101Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,472inferno
799nuke
694dust2
438vertigo
72office
41italy
5safehouse
2train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

45Matches
51%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
64.8ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis540%0.7012.8
Nuke5100%1.1719.2
Vertigo475%0.9413.3
Inferno333%0.539.3
Mirage20%0.7514.5
Ancient1100%1.0012.0
Dust210%0.547.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
72.0%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
617msReaction time
29.0%T opening success
36.8%CT opening success
0.33Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
5.69HE damage / grenade
4.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3256 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.9931% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke12–12-0.0412%11 Jun
nuke7–9-0.0322%10 Jun
inferno5–9-0.0039%10 Jun
inferno0–9-0.169%10 Jun
vertigo3–13-0.0024%9 Jun
italy2–13-0.0614%8 Jun
cache5–13-0.0615%8 Jun
inferno8–130.0416%8 Jun
vertigo6–13-0.0717%7 Jun
inferno13–110.0321%7 Jun
alpine10–13-0.0417%7 Jun
nuke7–130.0138%7 Jun
inferno8–80.0214%7 Jun
nuke9–50.066%7 Jun
nuke5–9-0.0712%7 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0516%7 Jun
mirage13–0-0.0333%7 Jun
nuke13–90.0514%4 Jun
mirage10–13-0.085%4 Jun
nuke7–130.0015%4 Jun
inferno13–60.0331%4 Jun
mirage13–110.0520%4 Jun
dust20–13-0.0527%4 Jun
inferno9–30.0013%2 Jun
inferno9–10.0917%2 Jun
inferno9–20.0224%2 Jun
inferno9–7-0.0928%2 Jun
alpine2–13-0.0819%2 Jun
nuke13–40.047%2 Jun
cache1–10-0.0644%2 Jun
nuke13–100.0621%2 Jun
inferno8–8-0.078%2 Jun
inferno5–9-0.128%2 Jun
nuke1–9-0.0925%2 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0914%26 May
italy7–13-0.0422%26 May
nuke10–130.0310%20 May
italy5–13-0.0211%20 May
inferno7–9-0.0527%20 May
nuke9–40.0317%20 May
inferno9–3-0.0424%20 May
italy0–10-0.050%19 May
dust21–13-0.106%19 May
mirage7–130.0122%19 May
overpass13–6-0.0712%19 May
anubis13–7-0.037%19 May
dust23–100.0924%19 May
ancient9–13-0.0314%19 May
overpass13–50.0417%19 May
dust210–13-0.0321%16 May
dust26–13-0.0816%16 May
mirage5–13-0.0717%16 May
mirage13–6-0.047%16 May
mirage13–16-0.0020%15 May
inferno3–13-0.0912%15 May
mirage8–13-0.0214%15 May
inferno1–13-0.0430%15 May
train1–13-0.0117%15 May
nuke6–13-0.0713%15 May
stronghold7–13-0.1113%12 May
inferno13–70.0417%12 May
cache11–13-0.0524%12 May
nuke9–2-0.0113%12 May
inferno9–20.0623%12 May
nuke9–7-0.0520%12 May
inferno3–9-0.087%12 May
nuke9–3-0.0423%12 May
inferno5–90.0121%12 May
inferno3–13-0.130%9 May
mirage7–13-0.0713%9 May
mirage13–10-0.087%8 May
dust213–8-0.0412%8 May
mirage13–3-0.0118%8 May
anubis0–8-0.0616%8 May
dust21–5-0.0438%5 May
inferno2–9-0.0719%5 May
nuke13–7-0.025%5 May
cache11–13-0.0310%5 May
inferno13–20.0518%5 May
cache13–60.0027%5 May
dust21–13-0.0420%5 May
cache4–13-0.140%4 May
office4–13-0.0118%4 May
inferno3–13-0.0817%4 May
nuke11–130.0217%4 May
alpine7–1-0.0427%4 May
italy12–120.0042%4 May
cache2–13-0.1027%4 May
vertigo12–12-0.0119%4 May
cache13–80.0815%4 May
overpass5–9-0.1211%4 May
mirage13–7-0.0324%29 Apr
inferno13–70.0218%29 Apr
alpine13–4-0.0110%29 Apr
mirage13–80.0115%29 Apr
cache13–70.0416%29 Apr
ancient13–110.0014%29 Apr
poseidon8–8-0.1325%29 Apr
cache5–13-0.0332%29 Apr
overpass11–130.0418%28 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →