ღMirazukiiiღ

ღMirazukiiiღ — CS2 Stats

JP76561198361243049[U:1:400977321]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,188Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,769Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating17,439Purple band · top ~18.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 29 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,439 -4,731 29 May19 Sept · 13 days played
17,43922,170peak 22,17029 May19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,284 +0 1 Sept10 Sept · 2 observations
1,2841,284peak 1,2841 Sept10 Sept
22,170Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,284Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-05-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,731 below peak (22,170)
  • -3,879 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,561 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches30
Win rate53%
K/D0.71
Headshot %53%

Measured 29 Aug 202623 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,086), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate47.4%46.8%48.3%meets
Shot accuracy19.1%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.111.061.07above
Match win rate46.1%46.3%46.9%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 9 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGღMirazukiiiღFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER17,439 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,284csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning49
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46477Last 10046%Win rateLLLLLTWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · +38ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 661ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility5.9
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 50% on T to 28% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning4.9
Utility5.9
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time557ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–7 · cache, 16 Sept
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · inferno, 31 May
367msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · inferno, 31 May
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 12 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L5Current streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 54% over 13ancientWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB33161748%-0.02
infernoB22111150%-0.01
cacheB137654%-0.03
anubisC114736%-0.03
ancientD61517%-0.03
dust2C52340%-0.03
nuke42250%-0.04
overpass41325%-0.01
vertigo220100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

96,188Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
4,488Matches
46.1%Match win rate
47.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
19.1%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 8 players
13,306MVPs
2,084Hours (in match)
5,290Bombs planted
1,730Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4726,514
AWP10,498
P2502,524
SSG 082,390
UMP-451,698
FAMAS1,201

Lifetime map wins

13,751inferno
4,174dust2
1,615train
1,109vertigo
1,062nuke
511cbble
232lake
135office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

713Matches
53%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
68.2ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3549%0.9213.3
Inferno3165%0.9813.8
Anubis1182%1.5615.0
Cache1164%0.9512.7
Nuke933%0.7911.9
Train729%0.8713.6
Dust2540%1.0015.0
Overpass540%1.1015.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
39.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.2%Spray accuracy
87.2%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
549msReaction time
49.7%T opening success
28.3%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
16.47HE damage / grenade
6.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 28.3232% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–13-0.0921%22 Sept
cache8–130.0036%22 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0426%22 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0614%19 Sept
inferno5–130.0120%19 Sept
inferno15–150.0018%19 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0523%19 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0120%19 Sept
mirage13–100.0230%17 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0118%16 Sept
cache13–70.0723%16 Sept
mirage1–10-0.0517%16 Sept
inferno9–130.0436%16 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0713%15 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0319%15 Sept
cache11–13-0.0530%14 Sept
vertigo13–6-0.0217%14 Sept
mirage13–90.0128%14 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0529%14 Sept
cache19–160.0023%13 Sept
ancient8–13-0.019%12 Sept
inferno13–9-0.090%12 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0216%12 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0619%12 Sept
inferno16–120.009%5 Sept
inferno9–130.0011%5 Sept
cache13–60.0223%5 Sept
anubis13–5-0.0131%31 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0419%31 Aug
cache13–11-0.0926%31 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0518%23 Aug
mirage13–60.0430%23 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0521%23 Aug
anubis16–19-0.0618%23 Aug
inferno4–130.0137%23 Aug
inferno13–80.0318%23 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0415%23 Aug
cache13–10-0.0617%18 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0314%18 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0726%18 Aug
cache13–40.0113%18 Aug
mirage16–140.0536%16 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0315%16 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0319%16 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0710%16 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0119%13 Aug
cache16–13-0.0428%13 Aug
inferno13–100.0420%11 Aug
dust213–90.0126%11 Aug
cache10–13-0.0411%9 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0311%9 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0329%7 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0118%7 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0118%6 Aug
mirage13–30.0631%6 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0410%4 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0122%4 Aug
dust212–120.0025%2 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0524%1 Aug
cache9–13-0.0630%1 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0421%1 Aug
cache4–13-0.108%1 Aug
mirage1–13-0.1125%1 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0629%31 Jul
mirage2–13-0.1112%31 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0523%31 Jul
vertigo13–100.0514%30 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0123%30 Jul
dust21–13-0.1033%30 Jul
inferno13–90.0324%4 Jul
mirage14–160.0324%4 Jul
dust213–40.0123%14 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0013%14 Jun
mirage13–1-0.000%12 Jun
cache7–130.0038%12 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0724%12 Jun
inferno13–50.0018%10 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0223%10 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0320%7 Jun
inferno15–150.0222%7 Jun
mirage13–100.0525%6 Jun
mirage0–2-0.060%6 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0227%6 Jun
anubis13–16-0.0522%5 Jun
ancient13–40.0610%5 Jun
overpass13–100.0628%3 Jun
ancient0–13-0.0713%3 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0422%1 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0520%1 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0944%31 May
dust214–16-0.0725%31 May
mirage13–70.0035%31 May
inferno13–8-0.0144%31 May
overpass10–13-0.0622%30 May
mirage13–40.0120%30 May
overpass7–13-0.0016%30 May
mirage14–160.0321%30 May
anubis10–130.0321%30 May
mirage11–130.0423%30 May
inferno15–15-0.0622%29 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →