JE — CS2 Stats

DE76561198147712707[U:1:187446979]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,965Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since

5,720Hours in CS26Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.3 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating23,593Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#5310 of 24467 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,065 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=3,007), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	47.3%	52.0%
Shot accuracy	12.5%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.03	1.08
Match win rate	46.5%	48.8%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning67

Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateLWWWWTLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7

Aggression10.0

Utility4.5

Positioning6.7

Opening Duels5.8

Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 67% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 67% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning6.7

Utility4.5

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels5.8

Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time484ms−63ms

first ⅓ avg 547ms → last ⅓ avg 484ms

Headshot accuracy17.1%−1.3%

first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — ancient 13–5

13–1Biggest win — nuke

5Longest win streak

9–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 11mirageWeakest map · 41% over 34

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	34	14–20	41%	0.01
inferno	A	23	13–10	57%	0.02
cache	A	22	12–10	55%	0.02
anubis	A	11	7–4	64%	0.05
nuke	—	3	3–0	100%	0.00
dust2	—	3	1–2	33%	0.06
ancient	—	2	1–1	50%	0.10
vertigo	—	2	2–0	100%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 34). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

149,387Lifetime kills

1.03K/D

7,618Matches

46.5%Match win rate

47.3%Headshot %

12.5%Shot accuracy

24,088MVPs

4,755Hours (in match)

8,996Bombs planted

1,738Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4756,849

M4A4 / M4A1-S28,196

AWP11,394

P2000 / USP-S9,320

Desert Eagle9,178

Glock-184,208

P2502,909

Knife2,800

FAMAS2,664

MP92,606

Lifetime map wins

21,592inferno

5,207vertigo

5,084dust2

2,428nuke

2,405train

1,705cbble

344office

196aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,593Matches

53%Win rate

1.15Avg K/D

89.8ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	119	57%	1.18	17.1
Inferno	114	68%	1.41	17.3
Vertigo	32	69%	1.33	18.4
Ancient	30	37%	1.17	18.2
Nuke	22	36%	1.11	15.7
Overpass	21	48%	1.14	15.9
Train	19	58%	1.10	18.2
Anubis	16	56%	2.19	20.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy

36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.1%Spray accuracy

81.3%Counter-strafing

7.4°Preaim

478msReaction time

39.3%T opening success

66.8%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

6.0%Flash assists

11.15HE damage / grenade

6.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4883 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.2503% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 34 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	8–13	-0.01	19%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.01	21%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.17	27%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.08	18%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	13%	23 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.05	19%	23 Aug →
anubis	16–19	0.01	8%	23 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.03	19%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.05	9%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	23%	23 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.04	17%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.04	4%	19 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.00	18%	19 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.01	15%	18 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.01	17%	18 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.02	20%	18 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.10	26%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.04	13%	17 Aug →
vertigo	16–13	0.04	15%	17 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.00	11%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.10	13%	16 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	18%	16 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	17%	16 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.05	29%	14 Aug →
mirage	12–16	0.03	20%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.05	20%	13 Aug →
cache	16–13	0.01	17%	13 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.10	0%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.06	13%	11 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.00	22%	11 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.02	14%	9 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.01	30%	9 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	21%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	13%	7 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.04	8%	7 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	19%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.00	11%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.01	11%	6 Aug →
inferno	4–4	0.05	30%	5 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.03	23%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.06	26%	5 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.05	20%	4 Aug →
anubis	2–13	0.03	16%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–1	-0.02	13%	3 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.06	21%	3 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.16	24%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.03	14%	1 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.04	14%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.03	21%	1 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.08	20%	1 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.03	9%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.08	16%	31 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.02	37%	31 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.02	21%	31 Jul →
vertigo	13–10	0.01	24%	30 Jul →
anubis	12–12	0.04	23%	30 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.08	44%	30 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.06	22%	30 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.04	16%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.02	21%	28 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.03	19%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.04	37%	27 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.04	23%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.07	27%	27 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.08	11%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	21%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.07	10%	25 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.12	18%	25 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	20%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.01	18%	25 Jul →
inferno	0–13	-0.05	12%	25 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.00	25%	24 Jul →
cache	4–13	0.00	11%	24 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.02	19%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.04	24%	24 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.01	8%	24 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.04	16%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.08	20%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.01	15%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	14%	21 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.01	19%	21 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.10	27%	21 Jul →
cache	16–14	-0.00	17%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.08	20%	18 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.04	20%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.13	29%	17 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.02	23%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.00	18%	17 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	14%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.00	0%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.02	9%	16 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.05	20%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.08	18%	16 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.00	22%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.10	26%	16 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.03	15%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.02	21%	16 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	18%	15 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.02	22%	15 Jul →
inferno	16–13	-0.00	28%	12 Jul →