Galvan

Galvan — CS2 Stats

GB76561198360479576[U:1:400213848]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,136Tracked matches32%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,230Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.4 LearningClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,169 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,169 → 1,169
+1Tracked matches · now 1,136
0.0ppWin rate · 32.1% → 32.1%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 5 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,380 -1,372 5 Apr27 Jun · 24 days played
11,41314,105peak 14,1055 Apr27 Jun
14,264Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,169Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-04-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,169
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 32 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches10
Win rate0%
K/D0.81
Headshot %46%

Measured 12 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 12 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,017), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate44.2%43.8%44.8%meets
Shot accuracy13.7%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.351.021.04above
Match win rate43.8%44.7%45.2%1.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGalvanFACEITLevel 5 · 1,169 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,169csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning34
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD35596Last 10035%Win rateLLLLLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +5.7pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 19 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 20

  • 515 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility3.6
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch6.0

Strong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 610ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning3.4
Utility3.6
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time600ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–10 · inferno, 5 Apr
63%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · vertigo, 15 May
359msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · cache, 10 Aug
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 29 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L8Current streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9dust2Weakest map · 10% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC1761135%-0.03
infernoC145936%-0.03
ancientC135838%-0.01
dust2D101910%0.00
vertigoD92722%-0.06
anubisS96367%-0.01
mirageD92722%0.00
nukeD93633%-0.01
overpassA53260%0.00
office41325%-0.01
train110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (10% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

67,607Lifetime kills
1.35K/D · Top 10% of Level 5 players
3,053Matches
43.8%Match win rate
44.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
6,202MVPs
1,539Hours (in match)
1,491Bombs planted
761Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4716,549
AWP4,019
AUG2,167
FAMAS1,946
MP71,781

Lifetime map wins

3,117inferno
2,606vertigo
2,213nuke
2,058dust2
1,107office
738train
147lake
146cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

69Matches
54%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
77.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2743%1.0716.0
Nuke757%0.9614.0
Anubis650%0.8214.7
Ancient560%1.0014.2
Mirage3100%1.2116.0
Inferno20%0.7210.5
Train10%0.7512.0
Overpass10%1.0715.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
29.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.0%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
610msReaction time
34.6%T opening success
22.4%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
8.25HE damage / grenade
3.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4747 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.5987% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

10% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno2–130.0216%15 Sept
vertigo0–13-0.0513%30 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0121%21 Aug
dust210–130.0710%20 Aug
dust26–13-0.0323%20 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0120%20 Aug
inferno1–9-0.0827%14 Aug
cache9–13-0.0433%14 Aug
vertigo13–50.0018%14 Aug
mirage10–130.0418%13 Aug
dust26–130.0412%13 Aug
mirage8–130.0313%13 Aug
office13–8-0.050%13 Aug
cache4–13-0.0750%10 Aug
dust213–10.0415%29 Jul
dust22–13-0.040%28 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0210%28 Jul
mirage3–90.0011%27 Jul
overpass13–60.0320%27 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0110%27 Jun
ancient8–130.0021%27 Jun
cache12–12-0.0717%27 Jun
overpass13–60.0723%13 Jun
dust28–13-0.0811%11 Jun
nuke3–13-0.134%9 Jun
inferno13–60.0315%9 Jun
anubis13–110.0111%9 Jun
nuke7–13-0.068%8 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0616%8 Jun
inferno4–13-0.1243%8 Jun
ancient15–150.0419%4 Jun
office10–13-0.0221%3 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0718%3 Jun
mirage13–80.056%1 Jun
nuke13–110.0620%31 May
ancient13–9-0.019%28 May
ancient9–130.0520%27 May
nuke13–50.1017%27 May
mirage4–13-0.0220%27 May
nuke8–130.0219%27 May
inferno13–8-0.0312%26 May
nuke10–13-0.0419%26 May
dust210–130.0329%26 May
mirage14–16-0.0120%26 May
mirage13–60.0129%26 May
ancient5–13-0.0512%21 May
anubis13–50.0613%21 May
dust215–150.017%17 May
anubis13–100.0313%16 May
vertigo12–120.0113%16 May
vertigo13–30.0719%15 May
vertigo1–13-0.0220%15 May
vertigo0–13-0.0663%15 May
cache6–13-0.106%15 May
cache5–13-0.0727%12 May
cache6–13-0.0713%11 May
cache13–70.0220%10 May
cache13–5-0.0413%7 May
cache13–40.030%7 May
cache11–130.0413%6 May
cache12–12-0.057%6 May
cache11–13-0.037%5 May
cache13–5-0.054%3 May
ancient16–130.0123%3 May
dust29–130.0119%3 May
cache4–00.0320%3 May
ancient5–40.0118%3 May
office6–100.0414%1 May
cache13–40.0616%1 May
cache12–12-0.047%1 May
ancient9–13-0.0836%30 Apr
cache8–13-0.0120%30 Apr
ancient5–130.0714%17 Apr
inferno16–120.0215%16 Apr
nuke13–110.0615%15 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0218%14 Apr
office9–13-0.0113%13 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0724%13 Apr
dust23–13-0.0325%13 Apr
overpass6–13-0.048%13 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0220%13 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0214%13 Apr
vertigo4–9-0.1433%13 Apr
anubis4–13-0.108%13 Apr
inferno5–130.0114%13 Apr
train13–10-0.0320%12 Apr
nuke9–13-0.027%12 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0620%12 Apr
vertigo6–9-0.1124%8 Apr
vertigo1–9-0.2417%8 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0411%7 Apr
nuke4–13-0.049%5 Apr
inferno13–100.1016%5 Apr
inferno6–13-0.085%5 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0435%5 Apr
ancient14–16-0.0416%5 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0220%5 Apr
inferno6–13-0.098%5 Apr
inferno13–80.0123%5 Apr
overpass13–7-0.0118%5 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →