mike oxsmall — CS2 Stats

MK76561198360291267[U:1:400025539]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

595Tracked matches30%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating3.2 Learning

WingmanGold Nova Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim54

Positioning36

Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40–59–1Last 10040%Win rateLLWWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4

Aggression3.5

Utility2.5

Positioning3.6

Opening Duels1.1

Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 626ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4

Positioning3.6

Utility2.5

Mechanics4.7

Opening Duels1.7

Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.2/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time626ms−95ms

first ⅓ avg 721ms → last ⅓ avg 626ms

Headshot accuracy18.5%−0.4%

first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — poseidon 9–3

13–0Biggest win — cache

3Longest win streak

L2Current streak

11–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 55% over 11ancientWeakest map · 24% over 17

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	25	12–13	48%	-0.02
ancient	D	17	4–13	24%	-0.03
mirage	C	15	6–9	40%	-0.01
anubis	B	13	6–7	46%	-0.02
nuke	A	11	6–5	55%	-0.03
cache	D	10	3–7	30%	0.02
inferno	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.01
vertigo	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.13
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.21

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (24% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

342Matches

49%Win rate

1.01Avg K/D

76.6ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	75	48%	1.03	15.3
Dust2	57	51%	1.05	16.3
Nuke	36	39%	0.90	14.0
Ancient	33	45%	1.09	16.1
Anubis	26	58%	0.99	15.5
Inferno	24	62%	1.04	14.7
Cache	12	58%	0.95	14.6
Overpass	10	50%	1.06	18.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy

31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.8%Spray accuracy

71.2%Counter-strafing

8.7°Preaim

626msReaction time

24.9%T opening success

44.0%CT opening success

0.42Enemies flashed / flash

0.0%Flash assists

10.72HE damage / grenade

2.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4176 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 24.8635% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

24% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	3–13	-0.10	12%	28 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.06	21%	28 Aug →
poseidon	9–3	0.21	31%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.07	19%	19 Aug →
anubis	4–11	0.04	21%	19 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.03	19%	16 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	12%	16 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.03	24%	15 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.06	18%	10 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	14%	6 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.07	4%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	11%	6 Aug →
ancient	1–4	0.03	25%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	16%	6 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.01	12%	1 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	11%	31 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.00	10%	31 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.09	11%	31 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	29%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.05	23%	30 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	17%	30 Jul →
vertigo	3–9	-0.17	13%	30 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.07	18%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	22%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.03	17%	27 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	13%	26 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.07	9%	26 Jul →
cache	16–13	-0.02	14%	26 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	16%	26 Jul →
nuke	9–5	-0.07	17%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.01	7%	25 Jul →
cache	13–0	-0.02	100%	25 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	8%	25 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	17%	22 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.03	11%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.07	21%	5 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.03	14%	21 Jun →
ancient	14–16	-0.01	17%	17 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.07	19%	17 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.01	25%	17 Jun →
vertigo	6–9	-0.09	36%	15 Jun →
mirage	22–20	-0.05	12%	3 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.08	18%	20 May →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	23%	19 May →
cache	13–11	0.09	14%	17 May →
cache	11–13	-0.02	21%	16 May →
mirage	13–16	0.00	10%	9 May →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	18%	3 May →
cache	7–13	0.17	28%	3 May →
mirage	13–7	0.02	14%	2 May →
cache	3–7	0.13	11%	2 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	13%	27 Apr →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	19%	26 Apr →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	14%	26 Apr →
anubis	13–6	0.00	20%	20 Apr →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	14%	9 Apr →
overpass	9–4	0.05	32%	9 Apr →
ancient	6–13	-0.06	12%	9 Apr →
ancient	13–10	-0.07	20%	7 Apr →
ancient	19–17	-0.00	18%	6 Apr →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	15%	5 Apr →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	14%	31 Mar →
nuke	13–7	0.01	34%	25 Mar →
nuke	13–11	-0.07	8%	24 Mar →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	16%	22 Mar →
dust2	13–9	0.07	25%	20 Mar →
mirage	13–6	0.09	25%	19 Mar →
dust2	4–13	-0.10	14%	19 Mar →
dust2	13–7	0.01	20%	19 Mar →
dust2	13–10	0.01	25%	12 Mar →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	15%	11 Mar →
ancient	4–13	-0.05	22%	11 Mar →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	18%	9 Mar →
anubis	13–11	0.03	10%	8 Mar →
inferno	14–16	-0.05	13%	7 Mar →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	14%	2 Mar →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	11%	2 Mar →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	22%	24 Feb →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	22%	24 Feb →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	13%	24 Feb →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	21%	23 Feb →
nuke	13–5	0.02	26%	17 Feb →
nuke	13–10	0.00	21%	17 Feb →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	14%	16 Feb →
anubis	8–13	-0.06	18%	15 Feb →
dust2	9–13	0.01	25%	15 Feb →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	37%	14 Feb →
dust2	14–16	-0.04	22%	13 Feb →
ancient	16–13	-0.02	19%	8 Feb →
dust2	13–6	-0.08	20%	8 Feb →
anubis	13–11	-0.02	23%	8 Feb →
overpass	10–13	-0.07	18%	1 Feb →
anubis	14–16	0.04	11%	1 Feb →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	16%	1 Feb →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	6%	1 Feb →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	17%	1 Feb →
ancient	8–13	-0.08	30%	30 Jan →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	17%	28 Jan →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	19%	27 Jan →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	29%	26 Jan →