v1nZ — CS2 Stats
DE76561198360120687[U:1:399854959]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
Rating over time
Faceit ELO
- At peak — 2,813
- Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 187 to go
- Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
- 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
- Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median |
|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 51.8% | 52.8% |
| Shot accuracy | 11.2% | 13.7% |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.34 | 1.08 |
| Match win rate | 48.6% | 49.2% |
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Strong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | 33 | 26–7 | 79% | 0.02 | |
| S | 21 | 14–7 | 67% | 0.02 | |
| C | 20 | 8–12 | 40% | 0.01 | |
| A | 9 | 5–4 | 56% | 0.01 | |
| D | 7 | 1–6 | 14% | -0.02 | |
| C | 5 | 2–3 | 40% | 0.01 | |
| — | 4 | 1–3 | 25% | 0.03 | |
| — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | -0.02 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ancient | 411 | 56% | 1.19 | 16.2 |
| Anubis | 318 | 56% | 1.21 | 15.9 |
| Mirage | 298 | 43% | 1.10 | 15.4 |
| Inferno | 208 | 58% | 1.32 | 16.1 |
| Nuke | 155 | 52% | 1.30 | 16.4 |
| Dust2 | 97 | 46% | 1.10 | 15.7 |
| Vertigo | 60 | 53% | 1.11 | 15.6 |
| Overpass | 50 | 54% | 1.15 | 16.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.6456% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11–13 | -0.03 | 13% | 19 Apr → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.06 | 15% | 19 Apr → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.01 | 19% | 5 Apr → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.01 | 14% | 3 Apr → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.03 | 16% | 27 Feb → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 18% | 27 Feb → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.00 | 21% | 27 Feb → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.01 | 14% | 22 Feb → | ||
| 12–16 | 0.06 | 21% | 22 Feb → | ||
| 15–19 | -0.06 | 10% | 22 Feb → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.08 | 22% | 22 Feb → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.01 | 17% | 22 Feb → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.03 | 8% | 21 Feb → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.01 | 24% | 21 Feb → | ||
| 13–4 | -0.01 | 14% | 21 Feb → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 12% | 19 Feb → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.01 | 20% | 19 Feb → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.06 | 15% | 15 Feb → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.00 | 16% | 15 Feb → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.09 | 19% | 15 Feb → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 16% | 15 Feb → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.08 | 38% | 15 Feb → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.08 | 10% | 15 Feb → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.05 | 26% | 13 Feb → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.02 | 15% | 12 Feb → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.01 | 22% | 12 Feb → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.08 | 32% | 12 Feb → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.05 | 27% | 25 Jan → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.02 | 21% | 25 Jan → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.01 | 24% | 25 Jan → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.01 | 22% | 22 Jan → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.03 | 19% | 22 Jan → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.04 | 8% | 18 Jan → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.05 | 18% | 18 Jan → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.05 | 15% | 18 Jan → | ||
| 13–4 | -0.01 | 17% | 18 Jan → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.02 | 24% | 13 Jan → | ||
| 16–14 | -0.02 | 15% | 13 Jan → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.05 | 31% | 10 Jan → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 15% | 10 Jan → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.08 | 12% | 10 Jan → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.03 | 19% | 6 Jan → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.04 | 29% | 6 Jan → | ||
| 16–12 | -0.03 | 24% | 4 Jan → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.00 | 9% | 4 Jan → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.01 | 5% | 4 Jan → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.04 | 15% | 4 Jan → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.01 | 15% | 4 Jan → | ||
| 20–22 | 0.00 | 18% | 2 Jan → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.02 | 12% | 2 Jan → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.03 | 24% | 31 Dec → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.07 | 17% | 29 Dec → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.07 | 23% | 18 Dec → | ||
| 16–12 | 0.06 | 22% | 18 Dec → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.09 | 33% | 16 Dec → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.02 | 18% | 7 Dec → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.00 | 30% | 7 Dec → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.03 | 5% | 7 Dec → | ||
| 19–17 | 0.04 | 11% | 20 Nov → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 27% | 20 Nov → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 18% | 16 Nov → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.03 | 14% | 14 Nov → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 16% | 13 Nov → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.10 | 24% | 13 Nov → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 14% | 9 Nov → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.07 | 24% | 9 Nov → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.01 | 23% | 2 Nov → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.05 | 22% | 6 Oct → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.06 | 29% | 18 Sept → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.03 | 11% | 17 Sept → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 11% | 17 Sept → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.06 | 9% | 16 Sept → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.02 | 13% | 15 Sept → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.05 | 19% | 15 Sept → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.00 | 16% | 14 Sept → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.01 | 22% | 14 Sept → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.11 | 17% | 11 Sept → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.07 | 31% | 11 Sept → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.04 | 17% | 8 Sept → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.11 | 21% | 4 Sept → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.04 | 20% | 2 Sept → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.02 | 12% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.02 | 12% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 15% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.00 | 12% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.00 | 15% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.04 | 11% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 23% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.05 | 14% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.02 | 30% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.07 | 16% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.07 | 18% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.00 | 13% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 17% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.07 | 11% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.04 | 14% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 19–15 | 0.01 | 12% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.03 | 19% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.03 | 12% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 21% | 5 Aug → |
Match data via Leetify.