Menace

Menace — CS2 Stats

SE76561198358656708[U:1:398390980]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,088Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.5 LearningClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating11,851Blue band · top ~45.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 19 days played since 3 Sep 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,851 -4,456 5 Sept – 24 Sept · 15 days played
11,85117,901peak 17,9015 Sept24 Sept
18,019Peak Premier in tracked matches
19Days played since 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 6,050 below peak (17,901)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,149 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMenaceFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER11,851 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim43
Positioning50
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–50–5Last 10045%Win rateLLLLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · +52ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim4.3
Utility5.7
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch6.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 65% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 36% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 59% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.3
Positioning5.0
Utility5.7
Mechanics2.0
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact2.1

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time551ms+60ms
first ⅓ avg 491ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%+4.6%
first ⅓ avg 11.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 11 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · overpass, 13 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · inferno, 12 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 22 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 75% over 8vertigoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC176–1135%-0.02
cacheC146–843%-0.01
infernoA138–562%0.02
nukeB126–650%-0.03
anubisC114–736%-0.02
dust2D103–730%0.01
mirageS86–275%-0.01
vertigoD72–529%-0.00
train—20–20%0.01
boulder—22–0100%0.09
overpass—21–150%0.05
poseidon—10–10%-0.17
fachwerk—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

202Matches
49%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
75.8ADR
29%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1040%1.0813.7
Mirage850%1.0415.8
Inferno560%1.5817.0
Dust2560%1.4413.6
Anubis475%1.2317.3
Nuke3100%1.0813.7
Cache367%1.0615.0
Vertigo10%1.0016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
28.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
59.2%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
541msReaction time
18.4%T opening success
35.6%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
10.26HE damage / grenade
9.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.3762% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.037%24 Sept →
cache7–130.0016%24 Sept →
ancient0–13-0.100%24 Sept →
poseidon3–9-0.170%24 Sept →
vertigo13–100.0022%23 Sept →
vertigo4–13-0.0113%23 Sept →
cache13–10.0630%22 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0119%22 Sept →
ancient11–130.0527%22 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.019%22 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.030%20 Sept →
nuke13–60.0111%20 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0238%20 Sept →
ancient13–50.0416%20 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.018%20 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0114%19 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0413%19 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.028%17 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0317%17 Sept →
dust29–13-0.1112%16 Sept →
ancient5–130.0121%16 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0717%16 Sept →
train8–130.0113%16 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0910%16 Sept →
nuke12–120.0120%16 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.029%15 Sept →
vertigo6–130.0325%15 Sept →
inferno13–30.0631%15 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0317%15 Sept →
cache13–60.0421%15 Sept →
boulder13–70.0817%15 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0024%14 Sept →
cache13–2-0.0338%14 Sept →
dust25–13-0.057%14 Sept →
anubis13–40.0117%14 Sept →
dust213–30.0817%13 Sept →
overpass13–50.1340%13 Sept →
vertigo10–13-0.0319%12 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.047%12 Sept →
inferno13–100.0411%12 Sept →
ancient14–160.0314%12 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0311%12 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.027%12 Sept →
cache3–13-0.037%12 Sept →
ancient13–60.059%12 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0612%12 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0914%12 Sept →
vertigo13–90.045%12 Sept →
dust213–110.0810%12 Sept →
inferno9–130.1213%12 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0212%12 Sept →
inferno13–110.0517%12 Sept →
nuke13–10.020%12 Sept →
anubis16–140.0213%12 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0217%12 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.009%11 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.130%11 Sept →
inferno13–60.0114%11 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0340%11 Sept →
cache11–130.0422%11 Sept →
overpass1–13-0.0324%11 Sept →
fachwerk13–110.029%11 Sept →
boulder13–90.107%11 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.027%11 Sept →
ancient13–90.0220%11 Sept →
dust213–80.1515%11 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.045%11 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0616%11 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0910%11 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.058%11 Sept →
inferno5–130.009%11 Sept →
train11–130.0015%11 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0614%10 Sept →
dust26–13-0.028%10 Sept →
inferno13–100.0815%10 Sept →
cache13–110.0526%10 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0618%10 Sept →
cache13–110.0010%10 Sept →
mirage7–20.070%10 Sept →
inferno13–80.027%10 Sept →
ancient13–60.057%10 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.024%10 Sept →
anubis13–100.0210%10 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.079%10 Sept →
cache2–13-0.150%10 Sept →
anubis16–190.017%10 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.027%9 Sept →
cache8–130.0113%9 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0011%9 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0321%9 Sept →
cache4–130.0219%8 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.0213%7 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.0211%6 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0214%6 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0813%5 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.038%5 Sept →
dust23–130.0329%5 Sept →
inferno13–90.035%5 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0514%5 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0218%3 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →