Menace

Menace — CS2 Stats

SE76561198358656708[U:1:398390980]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,141Tracked matches72%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,868Blue band · top ~29.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,868 -2,496 10 Sept – 15 Oct · 20 days played
10,79217,364peak 17,36410 Sept15 Oct
17,364Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,066Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,496 below peak (17,364)
  • -164 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 132 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMenaceFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,868 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,066csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning46
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–43–5Last 10052%Win rateWWLWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −4.4pp headshot accuracy · −37ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 501ms

Last 20

  • 15–5 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility6.5
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch6.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning4.6
Utility6.5
Mechanics3.3
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time534ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 520ms → last ⅓ avg 534ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–0 · anubis, 7 Oct →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 8–0 · inferno, 8 Oct →
367msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 8 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 7 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 85% over 13anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC145–936%-0.01
ancientC145–936%-0.01
mirageS1311–285%-0.01
cacheA138–562%-0.00
dust2B115–645%-0.02
infernoS108–280%0.02
anubisD103–730%-0.01
vertigoC73–443%0.00
overpass—43–175%0.05
train—20–20%0.02
poseidon—10–10%-0.17
boulder—11–0100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

202Matches
49%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
75.8ADR
29%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1040%1.0813.7
Mirage850%1.0415.8
Inferno560%1.5817.0
Dust2560%1.4413.6
Anubis475%1.2317.3
Nuke3100%1.0813.7
Cache367%1.0615.0
Overpass1100%0.7110.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.9%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.3%Spray accuracy
64.8%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
523msReaction time
34.8%T opening success
36.6%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
9.40HE damage / grenade
12.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.9248% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.8057% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–9-0.0620%15 Oct →
inferno13–100.0413%15 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0214%15 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0324%15 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0424%10 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.017%9 Oct →
overpass13–50.066%9 Oct →
mirage13–100.013%9 Oct →
overpass6–00.0329%9 Oct →
train11–130.0217%9 Oct →
vertigo13–60.0233%9 Oct →
cache13–110.0011%8 Oct →
nuke6–130.0416%8 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0612%8 Oct →
inferno8–0-0.0067%8 Oct →
inferno13–60.0621%8 Oct →
dust213–20.0113%8 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0214%8 Oct →
mirage13–100.023%8 Oct →
cache13–50.0011%8 Oct →
inferno13–90.0213%8 Oct →
mirage13–70.0214%8 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.037%8 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0210%8 Oct →
anubis1–5-0.077%8 Oct →
cache8–13-0.076%8 Oct →
cache13–70.0014%7 Oct →
anubis13–00.1410%7 Oct →
nuke13–20.0710%7 Oct →
vertigo12–120.007%6 Oct →
mirage13–90.0424%6 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0113%5 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.008%5 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.019%5 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0016%5 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0820%5 Oct →
ancient15–15-0.036%5 Oct →
cache16–130.0313%5 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0012%5 Oct →
overpass12–12-0.0415%5 Oct →
dust213–90.067%5 Oct →
dust213–80.0212%29 Sept →
nuke8–130.0917%27 Sept →
ancient10–130.0514%27 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0112%26 Sept →
inferno13–30.0422%25 Sept →
inferno3–80.0013%25 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0522%25 Sept →
cache12–120.0017%25 Sept →
vertigo13–10-0.008%25 Sept →
inferno10–6-0.0217%25 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0913%25 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0114%25 Sept →
dust210–13-0.037%24 Sept →
cache7–130.0016%24 Sept →
ancient0–13-0.100%24 Sept →
poseidon3–9-0.170%24 Sept →
vertigo13–100.0022%23 Sept →
vertigo4–13-0.0113%23 Sept →
cache13–10.0630%22 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0119%22 Sept →
ancient11–130.0527%22 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.019%22 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.030%20 Sept →
nuke13–60.0111%20 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0238%20 Sept →
ancient13–50.0416%20 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.018%20 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0114%19 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0413%19 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.028%17 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0317%17 Sept →
dust29–13-0.1112%16 Sept →
ancient5–130.0121%16 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0717%16 Sept →
train8–130.0113%16 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0910%16 Sept →
nuke12–120.0120%16 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.029%15 Sept →
vertigo6–130.0325%15 Sept →
inferno13–30.0631%15 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0317%15 Sept →
cache13–60.0421%15 Sept →
boulder13–70.0817%15 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0024%14 Sept →
cache13–2-0.0338%14 Sept →
dust25–13-0.057%14 Sept →
anubis13–40.0117%14 Sept →
dust213–30.0817%13 Sept →
overpass13–50.1340%13 Sept →
vertigo10–13-0.0319%12 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.047%12 Sept →
inferno13–100.0411%12 Sept →
ancient14–160.0314%12 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0311%12 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.027%12 Sept →
cache3–13-0.037%12 Sept →
ancient13–60.059%12 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0612%12 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0914%12 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.